Building a self looping "SMOT"

[happyfunball]

I will assume this is a serious question. Firstly I have not and still do not claim overunity . There is no deliberately fitted brake, however if you watch the video of the replication of Normans track you will see the ball being sucked into the magnet array and then rolling out of the array down the ramp.  As the ball hits the end of the ramp you see the ball momentarily slow as it exits, because the magnets are still working against the ball. Just not with the same value as gravity.
Do not worry Newton, the fabric of the universe will stay intact, a little steel ball doing some circuits of a track will leave that track if it travels to fast and will come to a stop when it hits the floor.

Question: if, as you said, the actual device loops continuously for hours, do you at least claim 'unity,' not factoring in friction?

Thanks

[elecar]

There is no indication at all of pushing in this video.   

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--3rugO_RMg&feature=youtu.be

Maybe you're hallucinating

Hi happyfunball, the simple fact is no matter how I present any of my findings the skeptics will always have the same collection of reasons as to why it did what it did. I imparted potential energy into the system by placing the ball into with my hand.

I have shown every single step of how the effect works, I am doing my best to try and replicate it here. I have shown a ball roll into a magnet array, be lifted higher than it started and roll back out of that array. I have shown that it can even do it when the ball starts at a lower level than the ramp.
I have shown in the replication of Normans track, the ball get pulled into the ramp in the middle of the array (4mm higher than it was when I placed it in front of the array. It then rolls down the ramp, escapes the magnetic field and makes its way back toward the beginning.

[happyfunball]

Hi happyfunball, the simple fact is no matter how I present any of my findings the skeptics will always have the same collection of reasons as to why it did what it did. I imparted potential energy into the system by placing the ball into with my hand.

I have shown every single step of how the effect works, I am doing my best to try and replicate it here. I have shown a ball roll into a magnet array, be lifted higher than it started and roll back out of that array. I have shown that it can even do it when the ball starts at a lower level than the ramp.
I have shown in the replication of Normans track, the ball get pulled into the ramp in the middle of the array (4mm higher than it was when I placed it in front of the array. It then rolls down the ramp, escapes the magnetic field and makes its way back toward the beginning.

I'm not asking you to show any more or assuage the professional skeptics. I'm simply asking if you feel the actual device, as you describe, would at least be considered 'unity.'

[elecar]

Hi powercat, I really do not mind the skeptics taking part in the thread, I do take exception to being called a scam, fraud, liar when those skeptics have not even given me enough opportunity to show the effect working.
I have never asked anyone here for anything, I have already said it, but not now and not in the future. There is nothing here for sale.
Yeah I will attack idiots with the same vigor they attack me, I mean TK I kind of understand because I dared call him out when he was leading the attacks on an elderly lady and stalking her, purely for his own gratification.
Watch the pattern Powercat, TK makes a comment and then his minions feel brave enough to step into the affray.

But more importantly watch how they never concede any ground even when they are shown they are wrong. Remember I asked you to dare to state whether the ball performed better with or without the magnets ?

Now show me where the 2 cretins gave any ground ? you can not and will not be able to, because the only reply from one of them on that matter was simply an attempt at moving the goal post and changing "what they meant"
They are not here for anything but their own gratification, heck, they do not even believe OU is possible. Think about that powercat, I hate golf, I think its a waste of time....... So guess what kind of forum I wont be joining !!

[elecar]

Hi happyfunball, I am not a scientist, I barely understand the concept of CoE or 2LOT, I played with magnets trying to get a conventional SMOT to work, I was inspired by Bills videos. During the course of trying it out I noticed strange (to me) behaviour when one side of the magnet array was removed. I toyed with it until I got the ball to rise to the top of the ramp and then roll back out of the ramp whilst still in the magnetic field.
I do not know what it is classed as, I tried to find out by posing a question on another thread which disintegrated in pretty much the same way as this one.

Here is my take as best as I can describe and my own understanding. The magnets can "pull" the ball up a ramp.
The ball is able to reverse and escape the field of that ramp from a height greater than it started. So in this case magnets = up - gravity = down.
All the threads I ever read said pretty much the same thing, " a smot can not be looped because the ball always leaves the ramp at a height equal to or lower than the point it started." 
That was not what I was experiencing when using the effect instead of the conventional smot ramp with 2 arrays.
One thing I can tell you is that when making any application you must steer clear of  OU or perpetual because it will not even be entertained. And that is why I have never and still do not claim either.