Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Building a self looping "SMOT"

Started by elecar, October 08, 2013, 03:34:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

elecar

 QUOTE MEGGARMAN

Quote@All
I may need to admit defeat with this project.
After completing my test track this evening, the best I could manage was 2 circuits of the ball by starting about 50mm up the ramp from the cross over point.
This is running the ball clockwise so that it enters the magnet array in the center.
After the first circuit it moves up the ramp about 25mm from the cross over.
After the second circuit, it only just manages to make it over the cross over, then finishes about 60mm before the cross over owing to a lack of ball momentum.
The 50mm point is perhaps a height difference from the cross over of about 1.5mm
I probably should post a picture of my test track + video.
Meggerman


Hi Meggerman, Amazing that you should consider admitting defeat after a couple of weeks. It took me many months of disappointment.

People honestly  make me laugh, you have said in your quote above "the best I could manage was 2 circuits of the ball"
Now think about that for a second. I will repeat what I have said previously. There is not 1 person on this forum, nor a video anywhere on the net of anyone ever completing a SINGLE CIRCUIT, and you are ready to quit ?
Ask them, "the know it alls" that is to show you one example of a smot that completes even one circuit. It has never been done to the best of my knowledge except by me and now by you.
You completed 2 circuits in a couple of weeks of experiments and now you are going to quit ?

I do not like using personal exchanges to prop my own arguments, so I hope you will forgive me for taking this quote from a PM you sent me. I feel it important since you failed to mention it in the above quoted post you made.
And please feel free to correct me if this is not the exact quote.

Quote"I can get it to loop twice in the anti-clockwise direction and without the magnet in place it will not even loop once with the ball at the same start point. If it could do 3 loops then I think I would be very close.!

Thats right no magnets no loops.

So adding the magnets you get loops ? Now go back and read what the Know it all have stated. "It will run worse with magnets than without"

I love it.

Newton II

Quote from: elecar on November 06, 2013, 09:24:49 AM

Unlike the real Newton, you are moron. And I shall treat you as such from now on since like so many of the other morons you lost respect by not giving it.



@elecar


What is so great in that video? (Reply #525).   You are bringing the ball against attractive force of the magnet and keeping it forcibly on the track storing energy in it.  Ball releases its energy by making limited oscillations on the track.   Where is your track which runs the ball for continuously for three hours?   If your intention is to post that 3 hour video after striking deal why did you start this thread with half information?

I don't mind you calling me a moron because except God all are morons. Nobody is totally knowledgible.  Even great Newton's theories were rectified / disproved by Einstein.

If I have caused any irritation to you please forgive me.   You have also caused lot of irritation for all by giving half information.

Anyway can we consider Nov 18 as the greatest day in history of science?



elecar

Quote from: Newton II on November 06, 2013, 10:16:26 AM

@elecar


What is so great in that video? (Reply #525).   You are bringing the ball against attractive force of the magnet and keeping it forcibly on the track storing energy in it.  Ball releases its energy by making limited oscillations on the track.   Where is your track which runs the ball for continuously for three hours?   If your intention is to post that 3 hour video after striking deal why did you start this thread with half information?

I don't mind you calling me a moron because except God all are morons. Nobody is totally knowledgible.  Even great Newton's theories were rectified / disproved by Einstein.

If I have caused any irritation to you please forgive me.   You have also caused lot of irritation for all by giving half information.

Anyway can we consider Nov 18 as the greatest day in history of science?

There is nothing "great" about the video Newton, I was asked to re do the video because it was felt I had pushed the ball. So there is your answer, nothing "great" just fulfilling a promise I had made to a member.

My prototype is currently in the hands of those who I am dealing with. I have a meeting on the 18th of November, I have never stated it will be the "greatest day in the history of science"

I have also NEVER stated I will be showing any 3 hour videos of it running. You should track back and you will see it was TK that used the 3 hour quote to somehow have an expectation of me to take and disclose a 3 video. Well how disappointing for you that is never going to happen. Of course you could show me where I said that would be what I was going to do, then I would feel compelled to have to. 

There is no half information on the thread Newton, there was sufficient information for replications. Of course most know it alls are too busy trying to debunk it than to bother trying.

TinselKoala

Just as I predicted: the insults and special pleadings fly perpetually, but NO EVIDENCE supporting elecar's claims has been or will ever be presented.

Elecar's little video actually demolishes his case. Look at it carefully. You can see clearly that he places the ball ABOVE the entrance to the ramp arrangement, and that he flicks the ball to the right into the system with his fingers as he releases the ball. The ball enters the ramp with excess velocity, goes around one full turn, then stutters to a stop at the sticky point and NEVER regains the height of its initial release. There is no self-looping shown and the energy for what IS shown is clearly coming from elecar's hand.

And further, elecar is claiming that I have "minions". His paranoia is showing, in the most comical way possible. I don't have "minions", elecar, but what I do have, on this forum, is a lot of ENEMIES, people who can't stand to see me comment.... but who have never even once been able to refute anything I've said. This pisses them off and makes them insult me and anyone who appears to agree with me.... and frustrates them so much that they start stomping their feet and holding their breath. But what they cannot do is to provide evidence for their claims.







TinselKoala

Quote from: elecar on November 06, 2013, 09:05:22 AM

Hi Bill yes I am still around, I have posted the retake video for you and Gyula. I hope it shows clearly that I did not push the ball which lets face it was the general accusation.
None of the videos have been taken down Bill. Which do you require a link to ?

You hope in vain, elecar, because the video clearly shows you placing the ball on the track, then PULLING IT BACK TO THE LEFT (pinball plunger spring), and then you FLICK IT TO THE RIGHT, and it never ever regains the initial height of your flicking release.