Building a self looping "SMOT"

[powercat]

Hi Powercat, respectfully you state the obvious, I mean if your give me this coming Saturdays 6 winning lotto numbers I will win the lotto !!

I stated right off the bat I would not be disclosing my working prototype, I am in the middle of doing a deal with someone who may be prepared to pay me for my design. Is it really that hard for people to understand ? Should my word that was given to that person be made worthless, just so I can prove to some random strangers that I am telling the truth ?

I state again clearly on record here, I will NOT be showing my unit to ANYONE until I am done with the business I am conducting.
If anyone only want to see my unit working, is it so hard to understand what I wrote in the opening post of this thread "please come back later"
But no, post after post of "show it"

Hi elecar,
note, I did used the word "obvious" In my original post.

There is a classic forum pattern emerging with the sceptics and the believers and as much as the believers try to get the skeptics to shut up, they so far have failed to produce a self looping model and that says it all,  I have lost count how many times on this forum claims are made for self running / self looping, and yet no actual evidence of a continuous running model is shown. 
@ all
I would love to see this device working so please don't start quoting theories at me just show the device working as claimed = self looping continuously.

[happyfunball]

The tests carried out in that video clearly show that the 2 experts are wrong in their assumption,

The tests clearly show the ball being released at different points on the track without the magnets in place.

It shows (the 2 red marks) where the ball covers less distance rolling when released from the lowest point without the magnets in place.

With the magnets in place it clearly shows the same test carried out and the ball making the "hole" each time regardless of where it was released.

The video also shows the ball rising and falling in the magnetic field the same distance every time regardless of where the ball is released from.

The video clearly shows that the unit operated much better, in fact there was an obvious gain when the magnets were in place.

Ruling out some unknown deception, which I see no evidence of, I would say there is no way to refute what you've stated here. The video shows the ball completing the loop.

[powercat]

Ruling out some unknown deception, which I see no evidence of, I would say there is no way to refute what you've stated here. The video shows the ball completing the loop.

Suggest watching the video again there is about a 1 inch gap between the start of the ball rolling and where it stops, most people would not consider that  "completing the loop"

[happyfunball]

Suggest watching the video again there is at least a 1 inch gap between the start of the ball rolling and where it stops, most people would not consider that  "completing the loop"

It drops in the gap at the top of the incline. The ball is poised over a drop. How do you figure it wouldn't drop if the gap were wider.

The semantics game is silly.

[powercat]

If your (assumption) is right and I hope it is, there will be no problem for somebody to show a working model, self looping continuously, but so far that has not happened.