Super simple way to see proof Pseudo Solid principle works using ring magnets

[gammarayburst]

See attached

[dieter]

Yes, absolutely. Nonetheless, we got 3 times energy gain and this one time energy loss, actually rather in step 5 than in step 4.


I did explain that, does anybody read my stuff at all? 


Furthermore, if I add more static magnets to the top of the horseshoe (see labels in step 1), I can increase both, attraction force in step 2 and repelling force in step 3, as long as the neutral end of the horseshoe remains rather neutral. So the gain in 2+3 becomes overproportional compared to the loss in 5. This is where the genius thing happens, in the pseudosolidity! We actually achieve a polarity swapping with permanent magnets, which was unthinkable so far. In that sense I wanna thank you very much.


An other detail: a PM between two steel plates with airgaps is a delicate matter, esp. with strong magnets and small gaps, because the field strength in air increases squareish and therefor balancing in the middle is like dancing on a razzors edge. Very precise, low tolerance, stabile bearings are required.


As an alternative we could think about friction removal, eg. with soapwater. I once used to move a truck sideways with one hand, when it was standing on liquid soap...


BR (as in Best Regards, my name is dieter, but it has nothing to do with a diet  )

[gammarayburst]

See attached

[dieter]

Butch, it would help if you add labels, explaining where the energy output is and where energy input is required, and how much, like example given "input (accelleration of mass + friction)" or "output (full magnetic attraction)".
I guess in this latest design the output is the attraction force from step 1 to 2, and the rest is input: the movement to the left in the further steps just needs minimal input?


BR

[gammarayburst]

Butch, it would help if you add labels, explaining where the energy output is and where energy input is required, and how much, like example given "input (accelleration of mass + friction)" or "output (full magnetic attraction)".
I guess in this latest design the output is the attraction force from step 1 to 2, and the rest is input: the movement to the left in the further steps just needs minimal input?
BR

BR, Good point, I will do so in the future. And yes the work in this last design is done during step 1 when the full attraction of the magnets pulls the lower bar up. Each movement left would be only very slight work involved. I will post a rotary version that will produce work with each movement from magnet set to magnet set.
Butch
Special note: BR, I just saw something, what if as the rotor arm in step 4, as it lines up with the lower horseshoe arm, you move the magnet all the way around the horseshoe loop to the top, then you have two magnets waiting there and the next rotor arm is starting to line up just as the lower rotor arm is leaving. Then the process starts again with the transfer of one magnet to the upper rotor arm. What do you think?