Reactive power - Reactive Generator research from GotoLuc - discussion thread

[poynt99]

Don't be ridiculous, I have no inclination or intention to force feed anyone anything...especially a lesson.

Is that so?

By your own "standards" I would say this qualifies:

Everybody non active like me should just stay out of the way and politely watch and learn.

I for one would be quite pleased if you would post something of technical merit and on topic, otherwise, well, perhaps take your own advice.

[Cap-Z-ro]

Is that so?


Yes that IS so.

I had no intention of singling out anyone in particular...but, since you insist on stepping out in the open - you are one of, if not the worst offender.



By your own "standards" I would say this qualifies:
I for one would be quite pleased if you would post something of technical merit and on topic, otherwise, well, perhaps take your own advice.

By your counter productive conduct and painfully apparent lack of contribution, you offer nothing here but an incessant penchant for disrupting progress and the free flow of ideas on just about every topic offered up.

I strongly suspect this is your vocation in life...else you would have become frustrated and left a long time ago...you know, like all the other builders you and your ilk have chased off.

[poynt99]

If you find my posts counter-productive, well I guess you are entitled to your opinion, and that is all that it is. I believe however that most find my posts to be informative and helpful. I post the facts as best I can and try to stick to the technical side of issues as much as possible.

On the other hand, in my opinion, your posts are not informative, rarely if ever touch on technical issues (on the contrary, you are usually whining about something or someone), and are simply disruptive to the topic of discussion. Take for example every post of yours in this thread; they do nothing to help explain Luc's results, nor teach anyone anything about electrical theory. They are however, completely off topic and hence disruptive to the end-goal of getting to the truth about this circuit and the results being observed.

And what constitutes "progress" is also a matter of opinion it would seem.

[Cap-Z-ro]

" I believe however that most find my posts to be informative and helpful. "



That "statement"...is a classic example of the standard Illuminatti mantra...' a lie repeated often enough will be accepted as fact.'

Except...when the lie is broken down into its motivating factors.

In this case, the motive is clearly to drive Luc to the 'poynt' where he will stop sharing.

We can't have anybody with any fresh approaches to energy production sharing their ideas...now can we ?

By the way, kindly provide us all just one example of you sharing 'anything' here.

Your superior "intellect" and attitude does not qualify.

[gotoluc]

Hi poynt and everyone,

today we will start the opposite way. Let us hear from poynt the logic of Inverting channel 2.
Maybe this way we can see the light and good chances it will all come together.

Below is the scope shot and circuit of the 1.5k Ohm Resistive load I used in my Tutorial 1 video with probe Inverted.
Please explain why we want the scope to look at a resistive load 180 degrees out of phase, why this is the correct way, how can the scope display a correct math power analysis this way, is the "Mean" or "RMS" the power on the load, if negative why do we want to read it this way, if positive what does this mean? and so on.

Please note that channel 2 probe is set at x1 but scope menu is set at x10. So no need to multiply channel 2 by 10

Thanks for your time

Luc