Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

Which is more efficient:  Riding the brakes with the emergency brake on or off?  The scheme that you label Archimedes, and the scheme that uses the insert are both inefficient ways to raise weights.  One is more egregious than the other.There is no "Travis Effect".  Three layers and a pod are less efficient than a brick.Now that's bafflegab that one can sink their teeth into.  Force never converts into energy.  Force has no equivalence with energy.  Try again Mr. Fraud.If the barrier you refer to is 100% efficiency, then neither does your scheme break that barrier despite your false claims.That is a bald faced lie.  Force cannot be equated to energy.  And more importantly:  The ZED is fundamentally lossy.  Nothing about the nested Russian dolls of ignorance generates free energy.  Always more useful energy goes into the nested Russian dolls of ignorance than can be extracted.  Always.Let's hear it for the bafflegab from today's contestant:  Mr. Wayne Travis!Poor Wayne, still pitching the fallacy that losses can be made up in volume.  They can't.No it is complete bull shit.  Levers don't make free energy, and neither do your contraptions.Flunked out then?Sure add as many as you like.  It does not change the behavior:  The useless contraption is fundamentally lossy.

Lol - you are so proud of yourself...

[MarkE]

A question or two.

If, in the video by Mark D., the production rams are being pushed up by the risers and that output is going into the accumulator that is also driving the assist rams, would that not mean then that the pressure from the production ram needs to be at least the internal pressure of the accumulator?

If that internal pressure from the accumulator is driving the assist rams and they are driving the dual ZED system,, is that not a volume issue? with the assist rams being a smaller diameter than the production rams.

Does it not follow then, that the volume consumed by the assist rams needs to be greater than that moved by the production rams in order for the accumulator to be used a "battery" for the system that was videoed?

What is the difference between the risers "popping" up or down?  That is to say, what if after lift they are allowed to "pop" but moving the risers down and the fluid out instead of up?

I have a better question:  Where in any of those videos was external work performed?  IE where is there any indication of actual output?

[MarkE]

Lol - you are so proud of yourself...

Mr. Wayne, are you getting snipey?  Tsk, tsk.

[mrwayne]

The nested Russian dolls of ignorance do not generate the free energy you claim.  You can keep suggesting that they do, but that is the fraud you have committed yourself to promoting.I don't admit things that are not true.LOL.  Keep pitching the lies there Wayne.LOL, the guy who has been cheating:  friends, family, and neighbors with his lies about non-existent free energy technology is accusing those who have pointed out those crimes of being unethical.  It's your shameless approach that's really awesome Wayne.  If you're good with continuing to build this record of scienter on your part, it's just fine with me.

Are you a liar and a Coward...

You are wrong and know it - you have seen the math....

Larry Was right all along...

It is cheaper and faster to use a series connected system to come to pressure -

[MarkE]

Are you a liar and a Coward...

LOL, you, the fraud: Wayne Travis claims that I am a liar.  That's rich.

You are wrong and know it - you have seen the math....

Yes I have and it refutes your false free energy claims.

Larry Was right all along...

Did he win the lottery?

It is cheaper and faster to use a series connected system to come to pressure -

Ah yes, more bafflegab.  What your contraptions do not do is produce one iota of output energy in excess of input energy.  Contrary to being the revolutionary source of cheap energy you claim to your investors, your contraptions are useless stage props.