Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[MarkE]

Great idea!  I only have to "pre-charge" the battery once every two months so that is just a maintenance cost.  I am afraid if I wired it to a teeter totter, combined with the input energy from gravity, it might make too much power and could not be controlled.  Mankind is not ready for this much energy production I am afraid.  Someone might use it in a war.

Bill

There is the risk of such dual use.  But it is much better: Praise Jesus! that we God loving citizens of the USA benefit from this holy gift for our own protection than the Godless heathens who would stop the Wright Brothers themselves if they had the chance.

[MarkE]

Height and width are not the same,, if it does not matter to you then that is fine,, I already said that.

The spreadsheet reflects the configuration that Mondrasek set-up with additional flexibility.  Apparently, you are all upset because one parameter: RiserWallThickness is used for both the vertical and horizontal walls.  If you want to piss and moan that the spreadsheet doesn't have some extra feature that you would like, such as independent vertical and horizontal wall thickness specifications then be my guest.  A more diplomatic way to get something extra is to ask for it.

BS on the claim you are sticking in my words there MarkE,, Potential is useless,, just like a rock sitting up on a hill.

If you refuse to learn basic physics, then that is your loss.  Potential energy and kinetic energy are distinct forms.

What YOU are not understanding is that I am always talking about a FORCE acting over a DISTANCE,, and now you are making things up.

Accuse away.  As usual your accusations are BS.

Stored potential is a packet of work that can be spent,, that is what I have said,, so where do you come of with the BS line.

Ah, here we see Tom Web special physics where you choose to redefine basic terms.  Packets are for routers and beverage sweeteners.  It seems that you are incapable of learning the real physics that operates in the real world.  So be it.

What do you call it when people make things up that are not true MarkE?  This is what you are doing yet again.

Let's see Tom:  You claim machinery that you have never had.  You staunchly defend the blatant fraud Wayne Travis and his phoney baloney free energy claims.  You make claims against physics that are totally false.  You continue to make such claims even when they are refuted again and again.  You claim that there are obvious errors in the R4 spreadsheet but you cannot even identify one.   It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see who is routinely on the wrong side of reality. 

Why do you choose to promote a fraud?  Maybe you're quite the clever soul and are deliberately playing a fool to make Wayne Travis' supporters all look bad.  If so, then my hat is off to you:  You are doing a great job.  Honestly though, Wayne Travis has done a great job of exposing himself. 

[powercat]

Webby
You are not genuine you are part of Wayne's scam team, much as you want to deny it even Wayne puts you in the same category as Red_sunset, look at this quote from one of his numerous posts when he announces he's leaving (again) your name is clearly there, and you follow the same script, despite being told repeatedly why it will not work you continue regurgitating the same old arguments, and following the Wayne $2000 Travesty, and of course Wayne's golden rule for more than three years, never show a continuous running device and never have verification by anyone credible.

OK - work is done here. To RED, Webby, Let them be - we are moving up, and onward.Wayne

[minnie]

   I'm sorry Webby but you've ended up having absolutely no credibility.
    You don't even accept what's stated on page one.
                        John.

[celsus]

Is gravity conservative?  MarkE says no, I think it is.

Gravity is conservative.