Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[MarkE]

Hey Webby - I am so glad that you are happy as one person....

The puppet master did not read or understand when you explained that there is no such thing as OU.

p.s He trying to avoid the proof that a series of independently lossy systems can be better than the comparison of the individual.

As was accidently proven by Kanshi - when he was MarkE, Proven by Larry when he was TK, and other - Even the Nascar.

He is busted and dug in

LOL, let's see what's wrong with your bull shit declarations Wayne:  You make the false over unity claim.  Admitting that there is no over unity is an admission of your own lies.  That's precious! 

Multiply any two numbers, such as efficiencies where each is equal to or greater than zero but less than one and the result is less than either original number.  If that is beyond your comprehension, return to fifth grade.

Kan Shi is a very knowledgeable professor.  Kan Shi put your bull shit claims to rest two years ago.  I am honored that you think I am Kan Shi.  You are mistaken.

His only answer - it is still not OU - Like who is asking....

So as I shared with Kanshi - your absolute proof that layering the system is not more efficient Is not so Absolute after all is it.

The Nested Russian Dolls of Ignorance do not improve efficiency.  They are a poor emulation of a comrpession spring.  Using ordinary materials a compression spring with like force rate and superior energy storage is less than 1/1000th the volume of the "ideal ZED".

As was said in China.....So sad........

Now - why does it matter - maturity.

Mature enough to admit that assumed laws might not apply to all situations - that the idea that energy from a black box would be proof of OU - it is not.

Proof by a closed looped system is OU - it is not.

All three of those claims assume "magic is required to provide Net energy ---

Webby - you have shown true maturity

You probably knew all of that before I matured.

Well done.

It's hilarious, you and your disciples of duplicity have been proven wrong over and over again and you just soldier on as though reality does not exist, going so far as to congratulate their failures as though they have been successful.  I think the way that you lie so freely and unashamedly is just awesome.

[minnie]

   It gets a bit difficult when you never tell a lie....... But somewhere in the back of your
   mind you have the realisation that you have slipped a few lies out in the past.
       You somehow become confused, but have the sense to ignore certain questions.
    Awkward isn't it!
                        John.

[powercat]

What do these three have in common,  webby1, Red_sunset, Wayne Travesty

Continuously claiming for two years or more that a ZED produces free energy.

Argue with anyone that doesn't support their claim, divert the argument and make them justify their position, be vague and misleading.

When shown evidence why it doesn't work, pretend something has been missed and start the argument all over again.

Always had a verbal argument never show a continuous running device,  promise but never have anything verified by anyone credible

Be route and derogatory to anyone not believing in the broken promises of Wayne Travesty

[MileHigh]

Webby:

Fair enough, I should not have done that.  But can you answer the question?

MileHigh

[powercat]

It is nice to know that you are saying that levers do not work for transforming a larger potential over a shorter distance into a smaller potential over a longer distance MarkE.

As far as all the other garbage you keep expousing,, well the square round file is just over that a way => or maybe learn to control yourself.

Now, you are also repeating what I have said and making out like I did not say it,, that is funny,, each column will have 25% left IF it is done the way YOU are saying it MUST be done,, like there is only your method of doing something,, that must be MarkE's "special" mechanics.

You keep "needing" and "whining" about seeing something that is in use everyday in the real world,, get a grip.

You sure are "special" guy there Marke.

You have got absolutely nothing apart from hollow words, where is your continuous running device, oh yes, you're too busy arguing and posting to have any time to build one and find out if the BS you keep dreaming of actually works, but then again we all know you're the $2000 stooge of Wayne Travesty.