Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

Started by mondrasek, February 13, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 40 Guests are viewing this topic.

LarryC

MarkE,


I told you several times earlier that your formulas shown in your example below wasn't accounting for the Water Head.


Statement below is from this course: Geol 121Hydrology Prof. J Bret Bennington


'A fluid mass has another component of potential energy owing to the pressure of the surrounding fluid acting on it.'


The attached spreadsheet is of a single Archimedes and has the corrected F*ds formulas, an Iterative Integration, and my original Paverage X Volume. All have the same answer except yours.


I added the Iterative Integration as concrete proof that this is correct, as I know you would still think you know better than a PHD in Geology.


Correct your formulas, they are misleading.




LarryC


MarkE

Quote from: webby1 on March 28, 2014, 09:04:13 PM
It is nice to know that you are saying that levers do not work for transforming a larger potential over a shorter distance into a smaller potential over a longer distance MarkE.
You are making a fool of yourself again Tom.
Quote

As far as all the other garbage you keep expousing,, well the square round file is just over that a way => or maybe learn to control yourself.
That's it Tom: Be a faithful disciple of duplicity.  Does Wayne appreciate how loyally you support his fraud?
Quote

Now, you are also repeating what I have said and making out like I did not say it,, that is funny,, each column will have 25% left IF it is done the way YOU are saying it MUST be done,, like there is only your method of doing something,, that must be MarkE's "special" mechanics.
Round and round we go.  You have not shown that you have another way.  As a matter of fact in the faint glimmer of understanding that you expressed you should have seen that to avoid the loss you must convert the energy from potential to kinetic and back.  Yet, your transfer pump precisely prevents that.  You've buried yourself many times over Tom.  If you want to keep digging, then shovel away.
Quote

You keep "needing" and "whining" about seeing something that is in use everyday in the real world,, get a grip.
Really Tom?  And what is that?
Quote

You sure are "special" guy there Marke.
How nice.  If only you could back up your claims.  You can't.

mrwayne

So the puppet master avoids all proof once again.
How are you going to squash the truth this time stay up all night and blog over the truth over and over again...
.........Good Luck.....

Mile High, no offense but you got skills in electronics - take care.
This is not a match of wits - it is refusing to be  8) 8) 8) 

mrwayne

Quote from: powercat on March 28, 2014, 08:53:40 PM
What do these three have in common,  webby1, Red_sunset, Wayne Travesty

Continuously claiming for two years or more that a ZED produces free energy.

Argue with anyone that doesn't support their claim, divert the argument and make them justify their position, be vague and misleading.

When shown evidence why it doesn't work, pretend something has been missed and start the argument all over again.

Always had a verbal argument never show a continuous running device,  promise but never have anything verified by anyone credible

Be route and derogatory to anyone not believing in the broken promises of Wayne Travesty

Powercat - you've been dooped by the  8) 8) 8)

Let me tell you now - I have no ill will toward you - even though you have tried to trash my name so many times.
I can not show you what you need to see - but let me assure you - the math tells the truth - no matter who is trying.
Math doesn't care whose side you are on - you have been lied to - by the  8) 8) 8)  manipulating the math to  8) 8) 8) 
It is cheap tricks by the puppet master.