Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[Pirate88179]

Cmon Bill. Why is it necessary to twist his words to mean something else. Is this how one proves their case, by twisting?   Your statement is as false as you say Waynes claims are. So what does that make you in comparison??

Mags

Mags:

With all due respect, those were HIS words in QUOTES.  You know...these things? "    "  So, how can one "twist" someone's words when they are quoted directly?  Surely you are much smarter than this sir.

Now, if you are claiming that I came to the wrong conclusion from his QUOTED words, now that would be something completely different.  IF that is what you meant to say then, just say that.

But, I did not "TWIST" his directly quoted words at all.  Everyone here can see that.

Maybe I was just being hopeful that he finally saw the light.  So, are you saying that I am wrong then?

Bill

PS  I did not see Webby claim that I came to the wrong conclusion from his "quoted" words so, you are claiming that I am wrong when Webby, (whom I "quoted") has not done so?  Are you psychic?

[Pirate88179]

Bill,

You are wrong.

OK then, there we have it.  I made the wrong conclusion.  My bad.

Bill

[minnie]

Anyone,
           from a mathematical point of view, we know everything about this relatively simple
  system, and if we have no losses surely there must be only one answer - the right one!
     Surely we must know what the answer is?
                               John.

[mondrasek]

Anyone,
           from a mathematical point of view, we know everything about this relatively simple
  system, and if we have no losses surely there must be only one answer - the right one!
     Surely we must know what the answer is?
                               John.

If webby1 is correct and the buoyant lift Force induced by the water charge to achieve State 2 is 1.7236063793N, then we can do the math.  The Energy released due to the lift is the integral of F*ds.  For the case of the lift F_start is 1.7236063793N and F_end is 0N.  The lift is 2.590 mm.  The integral resolves to 0.5*1.7236063793N*0.002590m = 2.232mJ.  This is clearly larger than the 1.905mJ MarkE calculates was lost from the Energy in the water between State 2 and State 3.

[MarkE]

Yep....... 15 posts or more of Trolling. that makes almost 290 pages of the same trolls
Some say that it is foolish to share wisdom with those who do not listen - Some do listen.
...
Wayne Travis

It's another day and another wall of self-serving bull shit wall of text from the fraud Wayne Travis, now pushing a messiah complex along with his tried and true version of: "The Emperor's New Free Energy Machine".  The good news is that it just adds more evidence of scienter to the huge pile.