Acoustic magnetic generator.

[Leely]

It seems the pickup coil has a lot of space between. Wind a pickup coil all over the two ferrite rods atleast for it to capture more power.

[itsu]

It seems the pickup coil has a lot of space between. Wind a pickup coil all over the two ferrite rods atleast for it to capture more power.

Right, i could do that at the other rod, and keep the present pickup coil to hunt for the nodes and antinodes.

Thanks,  regards Itsu

[Turbo]

I had no idea your target was Gunderson/Chava related otherwise i would never have posted in this thread.
It has got nothing to do with what i was explaining in my posts.
Good luck on your research.

[synchro1]

I had no idea your target was Gunderson/Chava related otherwise i would never have posted in this thread.
It has got nothing to do with what i was explaining in my posts.
Good luck on your research.

@Turbo,


Let me try and restore some coherence to the this thread; Tinselkoala barged in and ran a series of experiments on an MRA, Magnetic Resonace Amplifier, designed by Mclain and Wooten, where the transducer current is directed through a primary magnet core coil primary to create an LC tank resonance. He demonstrated the same infinite resistor effect of LC resonance that Itsu demonstrated in his series of videos. Tinselkoala went so far as to replace the acoustic transducer with capacitors, to underscore his peculiar project that was off topic by two parameters , not one. Firstly, the thread topic is the Acoustic Magnet Generator. The AMG as patented by Gunderson, has nothing to do with the resonant LC tank of the MRA that Tinselkoala elbowed into this thread with.


Tinselkoala had the audacity to call me "Bullshit" because I pointed out that the AMG merely oscillated the Piezo transducer, and did not run current through any primary coil.


I started this thread to find help in determining the resonant frequency of magnets. Milehigh "Trolled" in with the outrageous proposition that magnets have no resonant frequency, only to humbly recant in the face of Verpies rebuttal.


Turbo introduced the work of Jerry Bayles. Jerry's demonstrations of magnetic resonant frequency is definitly germaine to this thread topic, because it dosen't matter if the magnet is acoustically or radial magnet spinner full sine wave oscillated to achieve the resonant output amplification nodes that Itsu is currently experimenting with. 


The exciting feature in common here is the extra energy released from magnets at resonant frequencies.


Bayles appears to be exciting satellite magnets by spinning two axial polarized disk magnets  mounted in opposition on an axle in a Faraday Homopolar configuration. A magnet field viewer would reveal the field of one of the axial polarized spinning disks as stationary. Attaching a copper disk to the spinning magnet disk would generate a current between the radius and axle of the copper, because the copper disk would be running through the stationary field of the spinning magnet disk. The addition of a second disk in field opposition creates a second stationary field. Bayles maintains that the difference between these fields generates an A vector potential that oscillates the satellite magnets at 7.8 Shumman resonance. This is a mysterious force that has nothing to do with Lenz's law, and involves an excitement of the quantum medium, according to Bayles's theories.     


The interesting link here is that McLain and Wooten got Barrium Ferrite magnets to ring at 8khz, a bi multiple of the 7.8 frequency Bayles gets his increased oscillation at. What's going on here? Are we looking at an quantum ionic Chiral effect on the acoustic plane as Bayles theorizes? I don't want Turbo to distance himself from Itzu's experiments on this thread, because there are very exciting parallels between these tests that need correlation!   

[Turbo]

@Turbo,

The exciting feature in common here is the extra energy released from magnets at resonant frequencies.

Exactly but i jumped in because somebody was discussing my dancing magnet video.
That video was made many many years ago.
The mechanism i was describing is electrical it does not use magnets but it uses high voltage pulsed charges to excite the local medium so that it gives a response which can be loaded.
A voltage to current converter and voltage is cheap..
An continuous energized closed loop is always fighting nature and so you have to keep adding the losses.
The mechanism i describe opens up the loop and from that point on it becomes possible to separate the voltage from the currant and actually have nature helping you to power your load.
It's much like the work of T.H Moray so it's a different thing altogether. 

And i do not have any interest in chava or gunderson or mark golds or any of their patented work.