Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[ariovaldo]

Most of the QEG videos have now had their comments disabled and removed and even some of the "descriptions" have been removed, like the video from last September where she said they only need 7900 dollars or something like that and will have a working prototype built in "5 weeks".

The process of correcting the past has begun.

The "be-do" website is a real hoot too. Moribund and stultifying. Look at the "technical suggestions" portion..... there are two whole technical suggestions. One to use a telephone modem protector sealed gap for a spark gap..... HOOT! And the other is to _drop a core_ to see if it rings like a bell at 200 Hz, then compute the necessary capacitor based on that.

The "news from morocco": the last post is the lying post from MelB from June 4.... two weeks ago... that claims "overunity" and shows the "QEG team getting ready" sitting around a table in an English pub.

The only person who is actually doing any work and reporting it is our Ariovaldo.

Ariovaldo got some time off to watch " his Brazil "  struggling in the World Cup.

To say the truth, I'd made some more tests and one was to winding 4 more coils in the top of the existent coils. The number of turns was 80 turns of 14 gauge wire each one. The existent coils was connected in series and the resonance was made at 70 Hz. The new coils was connect in several configurations for trials, and the best number that I got was about 40% of the input power.
One thing that I was wondering is to have a rotor with 4 poles instead 2....just one wondering...

[Angelic]

Ariovaldo,
I to had thought about that. It would be interesting to play with. But I'm sure those things aren't cheap. Another crazy thought would be to cut the weld on the rotor and rotate 1/2 of it 90 degrees.

[PCB]

A lot to chew on here. Had no time to read in detail. May have to go back a few pages to start of discussion.


http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-general-topics/376-what-happens-when-overunity-is-achieved?start=108

[ACG]

Seems some still actually believe the simple uploading of a single PDF file has something to do with the actions of others.

8th comment down over at http://hopegirl2012.wordpress.com/2014/06/04/the-amazing-story-of-the-qeg-build-in-morocco/

"You have now started a movement for Tesla Electric Car to let go of their patents and open source their cars." - https://autos.yahoo.com/news/musk-tesla-going-open-source-lifting-patents-good-181914074.html

Poster completely ignores what the article says about Elon Musk's reasoning.  How after his Zip2 patent he wanted to avoid them whenever possible, too many lawsuits.  Technology leadership is not patent pending  but is based on a companies engineers.  Publisher finishes up with electric cars can learn from smart phone wars.

Notice not one peep about qeg.  Billions of PDF files can be clicked on irrelevant of closed or open sourcing.  The Open Source initiative has been around since 1998.  FTW, is one of a billion downloadable PDF files.  Tesla Electric must have seen the "qeg-user-manual-3-25-14.pdf" called it a movement and jumped on the qeg bandwagon .  That sounds about right. 

[mscoffman]

Hi,

I wanted to present an alternate schematic circuit diagram for attempting to maximize
power output from the QEG standard core. This attached schematic is based on manual
modification of one of F-Browns schematic but it is not concerned with simulation. It
is suggested by the observation that there was "more power in the primary coil set rather
than in the secondary side". What happens in this case is that *Both* sides of the QEG
are optimized for resonance and the energy is then extracted from both sides, suggesting
QEG power-core rather then a generator. Energy from both sides are then converted
to DC and summed together. It makes the assumption that both sides have adequately
low output resistance. The other things is the coils are arranged to best facilitate
equivalence of inductance and resistance. Diode bridges convert the DC currents from
both sides and are summed for output.

Hopefully the output voltage will not be too high, if it exist above 600VDC then it suggests
a lower total turns count QEG could be attempted. If this design supplies more power than
the previous record it is suggested that a unitary wire gauge #18 with all coils having the
same 1:1 ratio QEG be attempted. 

Purpose made bridge diodes should be used with fast, high voltage and high current
diodes. (somewhat pricey).   OU seems to like overloading, so starting with a large
number of incandescent bulbs is suggested before proceeding down the optimization
pathway that should ultimately replace all bulbs with low inductance wire resistors.
Once optimized one should record the final load resistance should be recorded as this
is the devices output impedance.

:S:MarkSCoffman