Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[TinselKoala]

Do you realize it has been _nine months_, roughly, since HypeGirl begged for money so that they could complete their _working prototype_ in five weeks?

That's massive OU, for sure, turning "5 weeks" into nine MONTHS... count 'em:
Mid-September 2013
October
November
December
January 2014
February
March
April
May
and half of June 2014 and still no "working prototype" anywhere in sight... but the Proven-to-Work Design keeps getting more and more expensive, harder and harder to build, the circuit gets modified, the travel schedule must be maintained, so good luck with your expensive non-working doorstop, we've got to move on now to another venue.

But people still keep pouring money into the pockets of these blatant scammers. Timmy Thrapp must be very envious. I'll bet he's revising his business plan right now. Or maybe he's waiting, to see if the QEGers get thrown in jail first.

[MileHigh]

Mark:

I wanted to present an alternate schematic circuit diagram for attempting to maximize
[color=#0081BD !important][/color] output from the QEG standard core. This attached schematic is based on manual
modification of one of F-Browns schematic but it is not concerned with simulation. It
is suggested by the observation that there was "more [color=#0081BD !important][/color] in the primary coil set rather
than in the secondary side". What happens in this case is that *Both* sides of the QEG
are optimized for resonance and the energy is then extracted from both sides, suggesting
QEG power-core rather then a generator. Energy from both sides are then converted
to DC and summed together. It makes the assumption that both sides have adequately
low output resistance. The other things is the coils are arranged to best facilitate
equivalence of inductance and resistance. Diode bridges convert the DC currents from
both sides and are summed for output.

Drawing power simultaneously from the primary and the secondary will not get you anywhere.  The primary and the secondary get their power from the same power source and they share the same flux in the core.  With absolute certainty your theory will not work.  Have you ever seen an experimenter's clip where they work with multiple secondaries?   They remove a light bulb load from one secondary and they observe that the other two light bulbs get brighter.  That's the law of conservation of energy in action.  The frustrating thing is most experimenters simply observe this type of effect but they almost never try to explain it.

Also, there is no need for super-fast diodes when the AC waveforms are a few hundred Hertz.  That's just another "crazy" bias that you often see in builder's threads.  You may want to use an exotic high-speed diode for a high-frequency application.  A high-speed diode will do nothing for you for some kind of QEG rectification scheme.

The QEG is a dead end and it's as dead as a doornail.  Everybody's test results will clearly show this with the huge caveat that you actually have to have proper electronics knowledge and good enough bench skills to test the QEG properly.  There is a decent chance that many QEG builder's groups don't possess the required knowledge and experience.  I base my comments by looking at the level of the technical discussion on Be-Do.com.

MileHigh

[TinselKoala]

Yep. If you don't have high frequency components in your waveform, you aren't going to benefit from using fast diodes over ordinary rectifiers.
Fast diodes are great for snubbing or siphoning off the inductive spike energy that bounces at your semiconductor switches from shutting off the current in a big inductor, which has the abrupt rise and fall times, meaning HF. Or if you are operating at actual high frequencies, like the DC extraction section of a wireless inductive receiver for example, where you want to rectify a 1 MHz power-carrying waveform with low losses.

But there doesn't seem to be anything like that in the QEG yet. At least, not until they figure out how to hook up that tickler coil and the spark plugs.
(I know how, and I'll gladly tell the QEG builders.... for an appropriate fee.)

[TinselKoala]

MH said,

I base my comments by looking at the level of the technical discussion on Be-Do.com.

'Smatter, don't you think that dropping a core to see if it will ring like a bell at 200 Hz is a good idea?


Just don't drop it on your foot, is my advice.

[Farmhand]

Don't you just find it hilarious when the scammers (QEG mob) begin to clutch at straws and refer to other scammers (Thane Heins)
that claimed OU but didn't have it either, to try to give themselves legitimacy ?

I think its real funny, I wonder how many they'll go through.

There was.

1) The C.O.P. = 20.0 Mob at the EF conference.
2) Thane Heins
3) Timothy Thrapp himself.

who else will they refer to to try to cling to the ruse ?

..