Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[ACG]

It looks like the build quality is improving, at least. I like the transparent endplates a lot better than the silly G-10 stuff.  It also doesn't destroy tools when you cut it like the glass-filled resin material. And look... more light bulbs!

Only 6 lit.  Damn TK, they starting to get to you too 

The radio interview starts off with the obligatory jump to a Tesla patent.  I have seen at least 2 different patents be reference by FTW.  Ask if its patent 511,916 Electric Generator.  If they say yes, they have no foundation to stand on.  One day is from WITTS, another day is from Tesla.  I wish the would make up their mind.

[Farmhand]

The C.O.P. = 20.0 Thread is unresponsive for me so I'll post this patent here as it is directly related to reactive power/power factor correction.

I think the EF Conference demo is simply talking of a slightly different version of this, I found this patent after reading one post in the thread at EF, I have not read the patent as yet but I did look at the pretty pictures. 

Any thoughts on this patent in relation to all this reactive power OU nonsense ?

Do this search (copy and paste) and the patent is there under the heading "Alternating Voltage Control Apparatus", The guy's
Name is R Shimada - ‎2013. The PDF is 2.8 megs. So I won't upload it as an attachment.

https://www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Patent%203%2C735%2C673

..

[Farmhand]

Here is the post from EF  that goes with the post above, I'll quote it here. From user "Listener192". [All bold text is emphasis by myself].

http://www.energeticforum.com/257852-post66.html

Hi All,

Long before the Babcock patent "controllable universal supply with reactive power management" was applied for, a Japanese Professor had already patented a more elegant scheme which basically does the same thing as Babcock's device, except soft switching is used, rather than the hard switching technique that Babcock uses. Both schemes rely on being able to interrupt current and recover the voltage from the inductive load, into a capacitor, which then can be used to assist a rapid rise of current in the next switching cycle. In the AC bridge configuration the MER's device can restore a power factor of close to 1, as seen by the generating source. The timing of switching is dependant on the phase difference between voltage and current and you can see in the example provided in the link above, that the voltage waveform is essentially brought into alignment with the current waveform by essentially chopping it. The MERS's device soft recovers the inductive energy, whereas the Babcock device relies on fast (hard) switching just ahead of current turn off.

The PWM version of this scheme actually allow retention of the sine wave, which is highly distorted in the simple time based switching scheme. Babcock scheme basically does the same thing.

If you can arrange for the source always to see a very low power factor reactive load which either of these devices is coupled to the other side of, feeding say a resistive load, the device could be used to align the voltage and current wave forms to apply real power to the load, assuming phase change is not reflected back to the generating source.

Many papers are available on the MERS device that describe the practical applications and having built a similar device (but with differences) I can confirm the operational principle is effective. This I used on a replication of the power gain SRM that Dave Squires presented two years ago, in place of the choke scheme he utilized. Unfortunately there were some operational considerations that's were not modelled in FEMM, that gave the impression that power gain was possible from this design.

Barry

All I can say is where is the common sense ? All of the reactive power originates from the supply and if we retain it convert it (change it's phase) and use it as real power we pay for it. It's very simple. As far as the scope showing power is being returned to the grid, well that can be achieved a few ways, but simply storing the magnetizing current/power released from the inductors then applying it later for some time a bit at a time by a fancy switching scheme could show that and suck in investors.

It would go like this the demo shows less than power factor 1.00 operation then the switching system is applied and the power factor goes to 1.00 or near but the power may not be getting reapplied rather it could be built up until it can be released a bit at a time to show a returning power situation for a period of time releasing back to the grid the excess of power reapplied in phase. This would show what was shown in the video clip I think.

Still all power comes originally from the grid, of course, even common sense tells us that. Sheez Louise. The other mob ought to be reported to the authorities as well. That is if they don't work for disinfo agency to make a lot of people mental over weather there is OU or not.  I say someone in the U.S. report these people to the appropriate authorities. The EF group are using this guys lies to sell conference tickets and other merchandise, it's fraud. Plain and simple. Con Men. If they were operating out of Australia I would report them and follow it up to see if they are prosecuted and if not why not.

There is no end to ways people could be tricked with electronics demo's, there is absolutely no reason to believe anything unless it is verified. Either by yourself or by a neutral trusted third party. These investment scams in free energy need to be resisted because if we do nothing they will ruin the entire (search for free alternative energy sources into a farce and a joke to all who watch with any common sense or learning about them).

This web article was brought to light over at The Heretical Builders forum.
At the bottom of the article he explains his theory based on the info he gathered.

Subversion of Alternitive Energy. [He made a spelling mistake, i'll blame his pencil] 
Maintaining America's oil addiction,
by Steven J. Smith.
http://www.whale.to/b/subversion_of_alternitive_energy.html

Link to discussion there, need to be logged in there to read that thread.
http://www.hereticalbuilders.com/showthread.php?t=523

Any thoughts on that ? Is this why some of the Scams are so well done and why some of the "scammers" seem to be "protected".
..

Here I'll quote his conclusions.

1.2.1
Summary:
All of these individuals, and many more left unmentioned, work tirelessly to create the illusion of progress in solving America's growing energy crisis.  They sell a vast panoply of books, pamphlets, and DVDs.  Each one overflowing with allegedly useful information, and yet completely devoid of any meaningful solution.  They hold countless seminars, conferences, round table discussions, and conventions.  Each one populated from a constantly revolving list of scientists, consultants, and industry experts.  All of whom pontificate for hours on end without offering any practical solution.

True that.

[SeaMonkey]

Aye, very true.

The Love of Money will drive weak men to do
unethical "business."

Stand by for either a "ban" or a "block"
when Erron is apprised of this truth.

The spotlight of exposure is too much for them.

[SeaMonkey]

Very strange - dunno how this got here.

Must have hit a wrong key or sumthin'.

On reflection - I now know how this got
here - it was a wrong key...