Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[Farmhand]

Standing by ...... I probably won't know until I try to log in to "try" to help someone over there that does not post here. I don't see any point to posting like this over there because all I would get is abuse and argument.

It makes me wonder..... How can Eric Dollard take part in these conferences when other speakers are claiming these crazy things.

A curious situation for sure.

..

[SeaMonkey]

Aye, so it is.

Eric is a "victim" who's endured many hardships at
the alleged hands of others.  His scars and resentments
plus extreme financial difficulty will demolish any
barriers that might otherwise minimize the temptation
to deviate from the straight path.  Easy pickin's for those
who know how to manipulate for gain.

[MileHigh]

Farmhand:

The Error Guy is shameless.  Look at the "advanced hucksterism" he openly displays for all to see:

REACTIVE POWER – REAL "FREE ENERGY" TECHNOLOGY

We're going to show you a video soon and it will blow your mind! Many of you may be hearing about a global effort to make some Tesla Generator and there is a lot of hype included. To date, there has been ZERO results showing that there is less coming from the power source than the machine is creating.

The video clip that you're going to see shows more returning to the power source than is leaving and it is very significant! That is the topic of Paul Babcock and Jim Murray's upcoming talk at the 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference – here is the description: Paul Babcock & Jim Murray Presentation Description | 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference

Notice the "crackpot bashing the crackpot" effect?  "The QEG is a fake reactive power device but our fake reactive power device is the real thing."

Badonk-a-donk musings:

Last year, John Bedini showed his  famous Bedini SSG, but with a modification. As the output battery  charged up, SO THE THE INPUT BATTERY! The wheel was just spinning away  and BOTH batteries were charged. That is what you get to see at the  Energy Science & Technology Conferences.

Will Bedini ever explain to his followers how an inductor actually works?  Even the ones that pay several hundred dollars for the privilege of watching him display his under unity and typically 30% efficient pulse motors? The answer is no!

The Error Guy's web sites are always totally shameless in look and feel, a study in an online form of tabloid trash.  Hopeless Babe and Error Guy are like two peas in a pod - a zombie we-ate-your-brain-and-picked-your-pockets pod.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

So let's dissect a new clip!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r6gc4mgHs8

What is the probe that the Montreal engineer is putting on the QEG?  It's connected to a blue box.

Jamie asks how much capacitance and then he comments that the setup will have to run fast and he seems to be a bit uncomfortable with the high speed that the QEG will have to sustain.

At the end of the clip you see the "wall" effect were as they add motor power the speed does not appear to change.

There is the setup for the critical test:  Let's say 200 watts motor electrical-in when they hit resonance.  Lets assume 80 watts bulb power.   You then measure the bulb power at motor electrical-in of 220 watts, 280 watts, and 300 watts.

That gives you four measurements for the absolute efficiency of power in to power out.

You can also measure (delta out)/(delta in) between 200 and 220 watts, and (delta out)/(delta in) between 280 and 300 watts.

You are looking at the marginal efficiency of the QEG.  Is it different from the absolute efficiency?

When you compare the two delta efficiencies, you are looking to see which way that is trending.  The "delta-delta."

So it's the power derivatives that you are looking at in your attempt to extract information about how the device performs.  You do a few different types of measurements along these lines, (varying the load and looking for the impedance match would be another very import series of measurements) and what you should start to see is a convergence.

The convergence is that all of the data is pointing at under unity.  When you increase the power input does any series of measurements trend towards over unity?  When you vary the resistance of the load up and down does any series of measurements trend towards over unity?

The answer is that you will see a convergence, a convergence in the data sets that all point towards under unity.  Some QEG fans might be offended that the results are being prejudged.  The real response is to roll up your shirtsleeves and do the required testing on the bench to see for yourselves.  The QEG will not lie.  The challenge is to do the measurements and share them (good or bad) in the true spirit of open source.  People without access to energy in underdeveloped countries, your "cause célèbre," are more important than the naysayers, or your egos.

So the time is nigh, time to actually generate good data with proper documentation from your built QEGs.

Like Speakers' Corner in Hyde Park!   

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Now let's look more closely at the differential efficiency of the QEG.

Here is some hypothetical data:

motor electrical-in:   200 watts     bulb-out:   40 watts
motor electrical-in:   220 watts     bulb-out:   55 watts

You can see how the marginal efficiency in this example is (15 watts)/(20 watts) = 75%.

So, the challenge is, can you hunt down the 25% loss in an ideal marginal efficiency of 100%?

Well, you can measure the resistances of all of the coils you are working with.   You can even measure the resistances of all of the interconnect wiring.

You have a DSO, you can measure all of the RMS currents in all of the wires.  Therefore you can calculate the differential power loss in the setup and see if it is close to the measured 25% loss in efficiency.   Perhaps you will be able to account for up to 90% of the efficiency losses as being due to the wire resistance.  Perhaps the remaining 10% would be due to the air and bearing friction?

You can can keep analyzing how the QEG works to get a deeper understanding of what is going on.

If there is over unity, your DSO or scope is capable of showing it to you.  So these types of investigations are extremely important if your goal is presumably to understand how the thing ticks.  If you understand how it ticks that allows you to build replications with more confidence that they will "work."  Or, the data is all going to point in a different direction, as previously stated.

MileHigh