Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[albator10]

Please look this 1986 patent's of of John W. Ecklin.

We see the exact same rotor and stator than the QEG

And in this patent there is no external motor because John W. Ecklin combined both in the same design.

[jbignes5]

Except there is a coil on the rotor. And this was my suggestion.


Actually the roots of any of these patents is this:  http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-390,721-dynamo-electric-machine


               and                                                        :  http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-445,207-electro-magnetic-motor




There are a huge amount of these produced by Tesla and others.
With the first example being the unit presented in sections. All of the sections can be built into the Exciter/Generator/Motor unit. EGM for short.


Here is a quote of note in the first patent:


"My present invention relates, chiefly, to the alternating-current system invented by me and described in prior patents, notably Nos. 381,968 and 382,280, of May 1, 1888, in which the motors or transformers, or generally the converters, are operated by a progressive shifting or movement of their magnetic poles produced by the co-operative action of independent magnetizing-coils through which pass alternating currents in proper order and direction. In my said system, as I have heretofore shown, I employed a generator of alternating currents in which there were independent induced or generating coils corresponding to the energizing-coils of the converter, and the relations of the generator and converters were generally such that the speed of rotation of the magnetic poles of the converter equaled that of the armature of the generator.To secure the greatest efficiency, it is necessary to run the machines at a high speed, and this is true not only of those generators and motors which are particularly adapted for use in my system, but of others. The practicability of running at very high speeds, however, particularly in the case of large generators, is limited by mechanical conditions, in seeking to avoid which I have devised various plans for operating the system under efficient conditions, although running the generator at a comparatively low rate of speed.
My present invention consists of another way of accomplishing this result, which in certain respects presents many advantages. According to the invention, in lieu of driving the armature of the generator at a high rate of speed, I produce a rotation of the magnetic poles of one element of the generator and drive the other at a different speed, by which similar results are obtained to those secured by a rapid rotation of one of the elements."

[gyulasun]

Hi Luc,

When I played with normal off-the-shelf mains transformers (with laminated core) by tuning their primary coil to (my mains) 50Hz frequency with some capacitors, I found very similar behaviour: very near to 50Hz the transformer started to buzz up very loudly and snapped through resonance and then started it again. It was impossible to tune to exactly resonate the primary and to manage I had to decrease the input AC voltage to about 20-30V from the 200V-220V with a variac to get a more or less stabil resonance. Any attempt to increase input voltage to the transformer detuned the primary coil and I had to retune it with the capacitor bank.

The explanation was that near or at the resonance frequency, the AC current in the LC tank circuit increased so high (several Ampers, maybe over 10A peak) that I do think the core went into saturation, hence the primary coil inductance changed to a lower value, effectively detuning the L from the vicinity of 50Hz to a higher frequency. When I reduced input AC voltage amplitude, the primary had a much less excitating current when it reached near or at resonance so the circulating AC current in the tank remained "workable" and "acceptable" for the core and it did not saturate. (Notice that a mains transformer designed for 200VA or so power level cannot readily handle several ampers of primary current without pushing the core's magnetic operation point on the B-H curve towards the saturation area.)

I think  the same happens in your setup: near or at resonance the AC current becomes so high in the LC tank (i.e. in the HV coils of the MOTs) that the cores of the MOTs get saturated, thus effectively changing the inductance value of the two HV coils of the MOTs.
In your case the MOTs have a quasi 'open' core vs a normal transformer, this would work against saturation but there should be an "average" inductance developed from the periodically opened and closed core structure which establishes the resonance with your capacitors  (2.5uF in the 2nd video).

I believe that you and some others have noticed that the input AC frequency to the 3ph motor was about twice as high as the resonance frequency of the LC tank shown by the scope: about 61-62Hz input vs the 30.5-30.7Hz shown by the scope nearing to the resonance in your 2nd video. (If I recall correctly, this was also the case in the second half of your first video.)  You got parametric resonance drive: your exciting input was at 2 x f frequency while the output was tuned to f frequency.

Your simple setup included two nonlinear components, the first was the saturating cores of the MOTs and the second was the lamps (the loads).  The lamps make such setups even more difficult to tune: they have a low resistance when they are dim i.e. when the LC tank is not at resonance and although the lamps low resistance is transformed towards the LC tank as a higher value, they still shunt the parallel Z impedance of the LC tank, making the loaded Q relatively low all the way towards reaching the resonant frequency. And when the coils inductance is brought by the rpm of the prime mover near to or on to a value which gives a resonance (a parametric resonance in this case) with the 2.5uF cap, then the impedance of the tank increases, this increases the AC voltage across it, hence the filaments in the lamps can start heating up, this increases their resistance manyfold: the result is a sudden jump in AC voltage amplitude because the shunting effect of the transformed lamp resistances are much reduced when the ligths flash occurs. After these events, the process repeats itself because the filaments cool down, their resistance decreases so their shunting effect returns. In this process the coils wire resistance also heats up, this can explain why you found after a while the repetitive process should be given a "smack" by a slight retuning of the frequency drive: a warmer coil resistance represents more loss for the LC tank so the sudden increase in amplitude is further controlled (kept at bay) with the less Q of the tank.

This is why it is a better "trick" to include the bulb or bulbs in the LC tank itself as yfree referred to: you do not need to worry too much that the bulbs would be 'gutted', the moment the tank reaches to or at the resonant frequency,  the tank circulating current would "see" an increasing filament resistance as the bulbs would light up, so the nonlinearity of the bulbs would somewhat compensate for the nonlinearity of the saturating cores. You can even see a series variable resistor in series with the bulb inside the LC tank in Fig. 62 yfree referred to, that would further control the circulating current (and causing further loss of course) in the tank but the level of core saturation could be kept under certain, further control.

My above "rambling" did not mean to characterize the performance of the QEG in any way, it just refers to your excellent tests shown in your 2 recent videos. I hope that all what I wrote above are understandable, if you have questions, please ask.

...
Also, to be safe and allow the high voltage to go through it would require more bulbs in series then I have available.

Inside the LC tank there is no HV but high current, the HV develops across the tank.  So the lamps would be "treated" by some Ampers at resonance, which they would have to "bare".

Gyula

[SeaMonkey]

Mh, your supposed "free thought" comes from books that dont encourage or engage in the idea that free energy is possible.  That is not free thought. That is called being programmed. Nothing free thought about it. All nice and tight in a little box.

Aye, it is tempting to believe that such attitudes
come from the books or the education - but that
is rarely the case.  It's an "individual" thing.

The vast majority of the books and educational
systems do not discourage, but rather, encourage
going where others have not yet gone.

Unfortunately, the Quacks and Fakers who've come
into the community seeking riches and fame have
muddied the waters.  As a consequence some are
exceedingly skeptical and cautious - to the point
of not being able to believe that anything new is
possible.  Until they see proof positive, that is.

Do not be dismayed by any skepticism which enters
into the discussions.  It is ever-present and does serve
a good purpose in the end.

As most already know, our true education begins after
we've been educated in/by the system.

Hang onto the dreams but temper them with reality.

Above all, keep the Ethics strong and perpetual.

[gotoluc]

I was testing hitting the MOT cores with metal like woopy did and found what causes the voltage.

I also checked for magnetism in my I cores and could not conclude anything.

Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3v2d2czTZg

Luc