Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 76 Guests are viewing this topic.

jbignes5

Quote from: MarkE on April 15, 2014, 04:41:49 PM
The fact that Hope Girl and team don't have one going should send up a lot of caution flags. I always find it curious when people talk of suppressed free energy schemes that they know about.  If someone knows about them and talks about them in public then they haven't been suppressed very well, and there shouldn't be any technical reason keeping one from replicating the supposed working technologies.  As to the plausibility of the military possessing these wonderful free energy systems, that would be the same military that spends $100. / gallon to move fuel in war zones.  If they had these wonderful technologies why don't they use them?


Well I can only tell you what they have presented in the videos so far.


The prototype was said to put out 9,000 Watts peak, 4,000 watts nominally stable. But there was a problem with the secondaries shorting out at those higher outputs. So they did have a prototype and the video's show that. He was in his garage or workshop in that one.


At Taipei They had a new core built and wound. In the process of that build they, The original builder and the Manufacturer, found out that they could layer the coils to extend the break down point and increase the stability of the coils. They need to be rewound. But even though they couldn't take the device into a higher output because of the shorts they found out that any additional speed in the motor driver caused a huge swing in the output VOLTAGE without loosing any current. This is where they were having the problem of the secondaries shorting out again. Without the new winding technique they couldn't go higher. This is a discovery period. They did have a prototype and they went on the limited success of the prototype to further interest in this device and secure funds to take it to the next level.


As for suppressed Technologies we all know the thousands of patents that are confiscated each year under the guise of national security. How about the Coleman device.. Thats one... For sure. Those are suppressions even though some are suppressed for good reasons like public safety Hazardous materials and such. But You have to think about all of the others that do not fall into these categories.


Suppression can come in many guises. Sudden financial threats. Bank accounts getting locked for no reason. Credit revoking. Foreclosures. And the most recent Suppression of not a technology but of rights, like in Nevada. 52 ranchers manipulated into loosing their right to public land usage. They will use all legal and not so legal avenues in the USA and get away with it if we do not stand up to these power brokers. All for a 3 billion dollar solar farm that will not be for us but for CHINESE interests Sold out by A senator who was promised probably a very good check for doing so. They do it ALL the time. Just open your eyes and you shall see. OPEN your eyes and stop closing them to these tactics.


As for government having technology higher then us well thats absolutely RIGHT. My father was a civil contractor hired by G.E. He told me not to specific details, because of security clearance issues, about many high tech stuff even before it came out in the civil sectors. Let me tell you some of the stuff I even laughed at but yet here it is... Scarry... He said way back then about 25 years ago that the average difference in technology was 50 years from Military to civilian releases and I trust my fathers word on that. He had a wall of diplomas and certificates that showed me then his extensive education and he worked on many of the nuke subs we have that is a fact. Most military bases have two structures, an upper public structure and an extensive lower structure. The lower structure is where they keep all the hidden tech and the lower structures have dedicated power systems that we could not even dream of to isolate them from things like EMP's weapons to Nukes to name a few and the power systems are not nuclear in nature. Thats what I got from my limited talks with my dad.


Take it for what it is worth suppression is what they do when it give the normal joe to much power. If we had such power there would be nothing in our way to just up and leave which they do not want us to do. They want us to feel helpless and just take their demands for everything we have or at bare minimum their cut.


As for this project why not wait and see what happens? Why speculate they are defrauding anyone without one shred of proof that they are doing so? The only proof at this point would be to build the device and apply the updates that they have talked about. Without doing so you are crying foul before the ball is even thrown or to the plate!

F_Brown

Let me recap from what I gotten from the PESN interview video and this thread.

1)  We are being presented a device that is driven by parametric excitation of inductance. 

2)  Driving a device with parametric excitation is an obscure method, although it is still a well understood process.  The parametric excitation modulates and builds up the noise currents in the winding of the device, noise currents that are created in the windings by exposure to ambient natural and man-made magnetic fields.

3)  Although there are zero windings on the rotor of the device to create Lenz effects, the build up of magnetic flux within the stator would likely create some magnetic drag on the rotation of the rotor, which in turn would cause at least some loading on the motor driving the rotor.  This load would likely be much less than the Lenz effect in a typical generators.

4) As a result of #3, as more load is place on the output of the device a reduction in the output voltage and or output current would be expected rather than an increase of the loading of the drive motor though the magnetic drag upon the rotor.

5)  As far as over unity capability of the device, the only suggested source for this has been some sort of mechanical-piezo effect involving the atoms of the magnetic core.  As far as I know, piezoelectric effects have yet to be verified as a source of over-unity operation in any device.  Everything else about the device seems common and ordinary in the field of motors and generators with the addition of a voltage limiting spark gap and resonant circuit tuned to a much higher frequency than the rest of the system.

6) In conclusion the device presented employs an unusual method of input, parametric excitation, which has been previously documented to be a viable method for the conversion of mechanical energy to electrical energy and to work with a COP of <  1.  Thus, it is my expectation for this device that it will generate a useful output at a COP of < 1. 

Now we have a least one person, who appears to be reasonably educated and skilled in the art, claiming the device operates at a COP of > 1, and his method of disseminating the information about the device appears to be appropriate for one, who honestly wants to get the information out to the world as fast and directly as possible.  Unfortunately the device described in that information costs upwards of $10,000 to build, making replication attempts cost prohibitive for a lot of would be replicators.  Also the videos presented so far have been less than comprehensive and convincing of any over-unity effects.

To facilitate replication and verification of over or under unity operation in this device, perhaps the core can be scaled down, so that a device would be made that would cost hundreds instead of thousands of dollars to build.  Aside from trying to figure out how to build a similar parametrically excited induction generator on a smaller scale, my take on this will be to just wait and watch.  Results from Taiwan should be rolling in soon enough over the coming days and weeks.

***

For those of you with the interest for it, here is a link to my step by step analysis of the Tesla Hairpin Circuit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7gPeIVVy0A

SeaMonkey

Quote from: MarkDansie
As to the plausibility of the military possessing these wonderful free energy systems, that would be the same military that spends $100. / gallon to move fuel in war zones.  If they had these wonderful technologies why don't they use them?

Only those who are at the very highest levels would
know why they are being reserved for widespread use
at some future time.  Their present use is for the most
part covert although in some instances have been
witnessed by unexpected observers; e.g. Area 51 and
elsewhere.

The present world system of control doesn't permit
anything to compete with the systems already in place
which are being used/manipulated to bring about the
Ultimate Plan.

What exists deep underground to ensure survival of
those "elites" would shock you.

SeaMonkey

Quote from: VidBid
Those are interesting quotes by MarkDansie that you have there, but I was unable to locate them with a search engine.

Where did you find them?

Could I have a link?

Aye, here they are:

First

Second



jbignes5



A scaled down version is what I suggested. If this is a principle they are using I don't think scaling down would hurt it in an respect. The problem then becomes what are the ratio of primary and secondary and what is that relation to the core.


I do have a 10.5" diameter 1" soft iron core but it is not subdivided. It is round stock and slit on the diameter or two halves of a circle. I was gonna use this for the motor/gen that I am building. I wonder if solid stock would work well enough to see the effect.


I have a 250 watt scooter motor that I could use to drive it and see if this would do anything.


The other problem for me is the copper wire. I don't have any yet and I don't really know what gauge it needs at the scaled down version.


I would also need a rotor and mounting stand with brass fittings in between each coil as per my design.


So I must get a few more things to try this out. In my version I'm gonna not use the big blocks he has for poles and only use the Toroid core I have with mounting hardware and a stand. I'll have to see when I can get additional parts and the huge amount of wire I need for the cores. Oh and in my version I can bobin the coils because the toroid is split. :)  This way I can try different coil setups like wind direction and solenoid versus bifilar as well.


The core cost me 50 bucks and I need to machine it a bit as well and then have it re-softened after machining. The machining is only to flatten the split planes...