Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 110 Guests are viewing this topic.

wattsup

@gotoluc

I understand completely. You know I am on your side man. I just hate wasting time. Our dearest friend @otto that just passed away in a blink of an eye left many things undone. His departure just kicked me into hyperdrive knowing that at my age (56) even in good enough shape, I can kick the bucket anytime. So who wants to waste any more time. Not me.

About your 1 watt OU testing, watch out for your scope probe ground. It will introduce so much crap into the circuits. Always have a habit of disconnecting the probe ground once in a while to verify if it is the cause of the effect. Because of that problem I always use my scope without the ground. I have learned how to interpret the waveform as being a pointal indication and not a referenced indication because the ground just screws things up especially when you are working on a floating ground system that had no ground of its own going to the mains. Tried explaining that at OUR but I guess I failed. hehehe Can't win them all.

Because you are such a great guy, I have been muddling an idea so I will put it here. It is not QEG related but much better and I personally think it has 1000 times more potential and should be very easy to do, and if it is promising, it can be replicated by anyone in the world.

So here goes nothing...hahaha.

A while back someone on the Energy Amplification thread asked me for new ideas. I did not forget so I'll put this one here. hahaha

OK, the best spinning sphere magnet I have ever seen was on youtube, a guy showing a sphere magnet rotating inside a Rodin coil. That magnet was turning so damn fast. So this proves to us that a Rodin coil produces a great rotating impulse matrix inside the donut hole.

You get that, right. Such great news indeed.

OK, now, the best low cost generator I know is a simple new or used car alternator. Funny that when you take it apart, you end up with this great donut shaped stator coil with three stout wire pairs leaving it.

The funniest thing is the stator looks just like a Rodin coil former (donut) and funny again that all that alternator stator wants is to see is a nice rotating field inside of its hole. hint hint

Due to lack of time, I will not be tackling this idea that has been bundling in the back of my mind for months now, so if anyone wants to tackle it and has some good Rodin winding techniques, because it does demand some discipline in the winding method (see youtube tutorials) and in the pulsing method sweeping for the sweet spot please do so because I think this type of "Spin Conveyance" may be a prime potential method when fine tuned as a low tech OU solution. Imagine an alternator with zero drag.

Why Rodin and a car Alternator?. Both techniques are proven performers so why not meld them into a Rodin Rotorless Alternator or maybe call it a "Rodinator". Maybe if JL Naudin reads this thread and needs a new challenge. hint hint

Why use the alternator stator? Because that part of the build technique is extremely difficult to get right the first time (say impossible) and these ready made stators enjoy millions in R&D and an already solid track record of performance. The winding angles, the armature, the known output all favor the rotating source field and not your regular axial core coupling. Maybe tape up the stator first so the Rodin coil wire does not get shorted on the armature. Or, find a good donut former that will fit the stator and hug the inside wall of the stator and wind the Rodin over that former.

Advanced Rodinators:

1) Maybe eventually add a center axial rotor magnet not too close to the armature so it can just float along pushing the effect with the Rodin providing the lead.  Could be an internal rotor magnet that does the switching that energizes the Rodin coils. Many ways indeed.

2) We may eventually discover that a virtual impress on the alternator armature has to ramp up slowly otherwise the armature may tend to seize or freeze the effect before it can overcome internal cancellations. Like requiring a minimum rpm to push output.

This means maybe a two layer Rodin. You start with one pulsing as a ramp up and when it gets to its maximum the second layer starts pulsing with the first then even a third layer after that one or as many as the design can handle. That stator is known to output 12 volts at 100 amps. Not a bad goal.

Even guys doing Jule Thief works, find a small motor stator, wind a small Rodin coil over it and pulse it. Play the hell out of it to find out what secrets can be discovered. Or take a naked toroid and wind a 2 or more wires Rodin coil style. Pulse one and tank the other(s). That's a new way to think of winding the toroid coils. It's like the Rodin and the Toroid were made for each other, both having the ability to engage in a virtual rotational loop.

Don't know if you heard it here first or not. Don't care. What matters is.... can it be done. All I know is I have not seen this anywhere so maybe this can be a more utilized out of the box approach and another part of the OU puzzle. This is however the type of approach I call realistic. You know where you stand from the start and not based on anything else but your own minds ability to reason out the build in your mind, work out all the bugs that you can in your head before starting a build. It is all pure creative logic in action but always keeping a realistic and open mind.

Everything around us is just yelling out "Please please love me for what I am and see in me the potential of what I can become."

wattsup

SeaMonkey

Quote from: MarkDansie
For those of you who are spending a lot of money and time on this replication, please bear in mind the plans given to you for free do not work as claimed. I wish you all the best.

Of course, all are eager to begin experimentation
with this device and concept but only those who
are able financially and have adequate technical
resources to conduct meaningful research and
development should be engaged at the present time.

Until there is a solid understanding of how the device
actually works and all of its operational parameters
the prospects for success will be greatly limited.

Quote from: MarkDansie
Having spend nearly 10 years and taking up to 40 plus flights a year assessing these devices and claims, I actually tend to think it is less likely as time goes on. My journey has taken me to [color=#0081BD !important][/color] locations around the world and the testing, investigating of over 100 devices. Several associates and friends have done  as much if not more as I, and reached the same conclusion.


could you please share how many device you have been up close to to form your opinion????

Then you must have come to realize that you're
looking in the wrong places;  you've been following
false claims and perhaps disinfo operatives.

Unfortunately, the vast majority are not yet privy to
look in the right places.  You've perhaps heard that
there are "black ops" programs (mostly military) which
are decades or even a century or more advanced than
the technologies which are available for public
consumption.  It is true.

While I cannot provide specifics to satisfy your curiosity
I can only assure all that the technologies exist as highly
classified and tightly controlled programs.

How quickly they are revealed to the people and made
available for general use is dependent upon how rapidly
world conditions deteriorate as the warring factions
prepare for the next large scale conflict.

The technologies are presently the possession of a small
group of "elites" who are reserving them for their own
uses.

Until then we can only continue as we've been doing.

vidbid

SeaMonkey,

Those are interesting quotes by MarkDansie that you have there, but I was unable to locate them with a search engine.

Where did you find them?

Could I have a link?

Regards,

VIDBID



MarkE

Quote from: SeaMonkey on April 15, 2014, 02:56:06 PM
Of course, all are eager to begin experimentation
with this device and concept but only those who
are able financially and have adequate technical
resources to conduct meaningful research and
development should be engaged at the present time.

Until there is a solid understanding of how the device
actually works and all of its operational parameters
the prospects for success will be greatly limited.

Then you must have come to realize that you're
looking in the wrong places;  you've been following
false claims and perhaps disinfo operatives.

Unfortunately, the vast majority are not yet privy to
look in the right places.  You've perhaps heard that
there are "black ops" programs (mostly military) which
are decades or even a century or more advanced than
the technologies which are available for public
consumption.  It is true.

While I cannot provide specifics to satisfy your curiosity
I can only assure all that the technologies exist as highly
classified and tightly controlled programs.

How quickly they are revealed to the people and made
available for general use is dependent upon how rapidly
world conditions deteriorate as the warring factions
prepare for the next large scale conflict.

The technologies are presently the possession of a small
group of "elites" who are reserving them for their own
uses.

Until then we can only continue as we've been doing.
The fact that Hope Girl and team don't have one going should send up a lot of caution flags. I always find it curious when people talk of suppressed free energy schemes that they know about.  If someone knows about them and talks about them in public then they haven't been suppressed very well, and there shouldn't be any technical reason keeping one from replicating the supposed working technologies.  As to the plausibility of the military possessing these wonderful free energy systems, that would be the same military that spends $100. / gallon to move fuel in war zones.  If they had these wonderful technologies why don't they use them?

vidbid

Quote from: MarkE on April 15, 2014, 04:41:49 PM
The fact that Hope Girl and team don't have one going should send up a lot of caution flags.

From the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atLN-mkmqBE , they have something going, but we need to look at the data, but unless I'm mistaken, there was talk of a 10 kW output.

Quote from: MarkE on April 15, 2014, 04:41:49 PM
I always find it curious when people talk of suppressed free energy schemes that they know about.

Why is that? I mean somebody has to know about them, right?

Quote from: MarkE on April 15, 2014, 04:41:49 PM
If someone knows about them and talks about them in public then they haven't been suppressed very well

Well, human beings are traffickers of information, and what is supposed to be secret is bound to get out sometime, isn't it?

Quote from: MarkE on April 15, 2014, 04:41:49 PM
and there shouldn't be any technical reason keeping one from replicating the supposed working technologies.

I doubt there are many people who could actually build a QEG in their basement, and the building of a QEG does require some advanced technical skills, doesn't it?

Quote from: MarkE on April 15, 2014, 04:41:49 PM
As to the plausibility of the military possessing these wonderful free energy systems, that would be the same military that spends $100. / gallon to move fuel in war zones.

I don't know if that analogy is applicable in this particular case.

If the military was using a type of free energy technology, wouldn't that be classified?

How would you know that it even existed?

Quote from: MarkE on April 15, 2014, 04:41:49 PM
If they had these wonderful technologies why don't they use them?

How do you know that they're not? I mean they could be using them in secret, right?

I mean their use in the military would be classified, wouldn't it?

Regards,

VIDBID