Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[MileHigh]

George and Mark:

Sorry for the side debate but I think that we all have to be real, and reminded of that from time to time.

I screen capped your equation on the EMF generation and it is attached to this posting.

For starters, why are you calling it "Energy" or "Energy transfer?"  It looks like it's an equation for EMF generation.  I have to read your second paper a few more times and it's late now.  Permit me to make a few more comments/questions just the same.

There is the resonating primary inductance (two coils), and the output secondary (also two coils.)  Your equation would be clearer if you define if you are talking about the primaries or secondaries for the currents, voltages, and inductance values.

I am not comfortable with your parametric coupling term (i * dL/dt).   I am assuming that you are talking about the primary inductance because the primary inductance is not constant.  When you state "i" I am also assuming that you are talking about the primary current.  The problem is that the primary current "i" is also a function of the primary inductance and the time phase of the LC resonator.  The way the equation is written it appears that you are treating the current "i" as a constant.

Sorry for all the issues raised, but if you are basing your discussion on that formula it needs to be clear and the derivation of that formula could use more explanation.

My argument is that the act of somehow varying the primary inductance itself is not a mechanism to produce power.  It's the "background" process where within all that LC resonant stuff going on, you still have conventional mechanical-to-electrical generation taking place and the associated back-torque on the motor due to Lenz drag.  I think you also state that in your paper.

Thanks,

MileHigh

[ACG]

According to all rigidly conventional minds in the electrical field this QEG will not work.

I am sure there are many sites populated by these 'conventional minds'...that is where they belong - not  here, on an 'out of the box' thinking forum.

Unless they are here to derail topical discussion, what purpose do they serve ?

Regards...

Will not work as claimed, 10x power out than in?  As it stands QEG has all the bells and whistles of a parametric generator.  PGs do work.  Illuminating light bulbs does not = more out than in.  A hand cracked generator can turn on a few bulbs but can you make it crank on its one without the hand.  You see that is the underlying question and has yet to be clearly demonstrated. 

I hope you don't think those who question the QEG deny that it actually provides power.  I for one want to know which of the off the shelf parts or arrangement there of is responsible for the claimed excess power.

[Cap-Z-ro]

I remain positively optomistic, with an open mind.

Mindful of the fact that free energy will come via out of the box thinking.

I am very suspicious of the motives of people who continually and incessantly disrupt the free flow of tropical discussion by interjecting conventional electrical dogma.

Regards...

[MileHigh]

Before I go to bed I have a final thought for you Captain Zero,

Quoting you:

I am very suspicious of the motives of people who continually and incessantly disrupt the free flow of tropical discussion by interjecting conventional electrical dogma.

For starters, debating and discussing technical points is not disrupting.  But more importantly, every single circuit I have ever seen presented on forums like this one behave according to "conventional electric dogma."  Do you get that?  Just because someone says it's so for his 'magic' circuit doesn't necessarily mean it's so.  Look at all of the Akula devices, it's the same pattern yet again.  "Conventional electric dogma" is what is real, and that's what's been staring you in the face for years.

It's like you and your counterparts have a co-dependent symbiotic relationship going on and it's not healthy.  You have the hoaxers and/or the obsessive-compulsives putting button batteries into circuits and making YouTube clips on one side, and the chronic believers that just want and need to believe on the other side.  Then there is a third angle, the criminal element that sees this taking place and they want in on the action to monetize it.

You desperately need people to give you a dose of "dogma" because the busted obsessive-compulsives then need to regroup and come up with another clip.  On second thought, it almost sounds like we are in the loop also.

Stop pretending circuits are "unconventional" until they are properly vetted.  There are no unconventional circuits on the horizon and there may never be.

MileHigh

[Cap-Z-ro]

I have stated numerous times (and this guy continually pretends he missed it) that all these redirects by closed minds, in a discussion among the open minded here serves only to discourage otheres from attempting a replication, where they may potentially stumble upon a break through, which also happens to be how most break throughs are discovered.

But that process isn't so likely to properly develop amid the constant negative interruptions.

But noooo, he is helping the dumb replicators here, to save their hard earned money...horray!

Regards...