Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[MileHigh]

ChrisC,

So you want to puff out your chest?   I challenge you right now, no Google, in your own words, write out six full paragraphs that describe how a coil works and two more paragraphs explaining how coils and capacitors are actually very very similar.

Let's see if you are FoS or not.

MileHigh

[chrisC]

ChrisC,

So you want to puff out you chest?   I challenge you right now, no Google, in your own words, write out six full paragraphs that describe how a coil works and two more paragraphs explaining how coils and capacitors are actually very very similar.

Let's see if you are FoS or not.

MileHigh

Get a life man. Not only do you write crap and talk too much, you're also childish. Try to learn something solid instead.
cheers
chrisC

[Cap-Z-ro]

According to all rigidly conventional minds in the electrical field this QEG will not work.

I am sure there are many sites populated by these 'conventional minds'...that is where they belong - not  here, on an 'out of the box' thinking forum.

Unless they are here to derail topical discussion, what purpose do they serve ?

Regards...

[MileHigh]

ChrisC:  Thank you for confirming that you are FoS.

[ACG]

Greetings:
I am new to this site and am reposting the following which I have already posted on the QEG be-do.com site.
I am attaching two pdf documents.  Please read them in the following order:

1st pdf attachment (our first attempt to reverse engineer the QEG)
this posting
2nd pdf attachment (a description of our construction of a 1/4 scale version of the QEG)


Resonance Achieved!!
Development and Test of Mini-QEG
In this note, Mark and I (George, aka Herm), both electrical engineers continue into our investigation of the operating principals of the QEG. 
In our first PDF note, we reverse engineered the design of the QEG to the best of our abilities without having an actual working unit to test.  Since obtaining a full-sized core will take some time, we decided to build a smaller test device.  Our first attempt was revealed in a note describing a core fabricated from a metal tape-wound toroid with machined, clamp-on pole pieces.  This approach proved unusable because testing revealed the lack of sufficient magnetic coupling to the toroid to allow inductive modulation.  During the test, we discovered an unexpected 16 Mhz signal on the core resonance winding.  It was later discovered that this signal was emanating from the arcing of the DC motor carbon brushes.   The signal was being picked up by the core windings acting as a magnetic loop antenna.  We issued a note when this was discovered and then abandoned study of this device and constructed a new Mini-QEG.
Later, upon further contemplation, we realized that a signal of this type may have been used in the original QEG to energize the "exciter coil".  In the larger (1 HP) motor, brush arcing would produce a lower frequency signal, possibly around 1 Mhz.    The resonant "exciter coil" would pick up the signal and develop enough voltage to fire the spark gap providing a current pulse to the output winding thus polarizing the core and helping to initiate core resonance.  This possibility was demonstrated by firing a charged capacitor into the output winding of the operating mini-QEG producing a much larger output.  This effect could also be produced by using a bar magnet with one pole facing the shaft end of the mini-QEG effectively jump starting phase-locked resonance.  This resonance would continue after magnet removal.
See attached PDF  for details, schematics, and photos.

From PDF QEG v2_2, "James Robitaille stated that the exciter is not necessary for the basic operation of the QEG; therefore,
we omitted it from this analysis."  What defines basic operation?  Is this power produced on the output coil with COP < 1, or resonance regardless of any production of power?

Now if basic operation is to mean functions as a switched reluctance generator (SRG), then I would say yes the exciter is not needed other than to place a small initial remanence magnetism in the core.  Where does more out than in fit into this claim?  I wonder if experimenters will continue to reinvent the wheel by producing power from a device that long since has be patented and used.

I have no doubt the QEG would produce power as an SR generator, there is no mysticism about them. 
Any one know what component of the released manual takes this particular generator a step further from a COP < 1 to a COP ~= 10?  The cap bank, the exciter, the 1.5 inch unit dimension of the construction?  Surely the QEG team or at least the inventor should know what the special component is and should just come out and say it and be done with the mysticism.