Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 54 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hope

Quote from: MarkE on May 10, 2014, 07:12:51 PM
Unlike you I have not made false claims to a perpetual motion machine.  Unlike you I have not raised money to pay for globetrotting trips by building up hopes to help the poor.  What I design works.


LOL  i have never claimed to have made such a machine.   Like most here who are serious I have worked on ideas hoping for a self runner.




Hope

Quote from: MarkE on May 09, 2014, 08:19:49 PM
You can make all the unilateral declarations that you want.  You have not made and cannot make a self running machine much less one that self runs and delivers surplus energy.  You have repeatedly demonstrated your inability to deliver on your blatantly false claims.


Which?   What claims the only thing I can remember not doing I said I would was make an outline for someone but they quit working on their project.   You are good at making false claims against others is all I can see.

MarkE

Quote from: Hope on May 13, 2014, 03:08:17 AM
I have to laugh LOL  I have worked as an electronics engineer for years and before that in machine repair both electronic and mechanical.  Analog and digital fields.   What I am saying is if you stand on the given teachings you will justify every part of how things work on those taught theories.   And the storm of comments received proves this.   We have instruments designed to show "proofs" so of course we are convinced that is exactly what we see in the data we receive from those instruments.   How pure a science Tesla worked in without all that contrived nonsense yet established.  He made his own equipment, built his own laboratory to show his work true.   So when you come to me with "boxed" arguments we are talking apples vs oranges gentlemen.


Let me enlighten you on just recent discoveries that will illustrate my point.   We have this slightly odd free thinking guy named John Hutchinson combine wavelengths and disrupt molecular bonds of atoms into a unidentified third element.  This was in the 1990's and that is what the best labs could tell us.   Yet 10 years later we know that element was taken to the single layer form with these waveforms.   So where lack of knowledge was they injected a 3rd unidentified element into being.  When all along it was the same element just in this single layered form  (yet unheard of).  All the "measurements" taken are taken from equipment built using incorrect conclusions of what is really going on.   So of course, you can just discount anyone not conforming to those "boxes".  It is simple, I mean you have hard evidence right?  But really what you have are conclusions based on thought correct theories.   That is all you really have.  How many times have theories of all sorts been revised or even totally remade?  MOST is the answer to that.  But all the people stand on their soap boxes and spout empirical data taught to them by others who believed others who.....back to the originating theory.   If what tools we have will not support the work at hand then we need better tools that WILL model the objectives. 


Most of my work has been in electromechanical devices and servo controllers so my mind is full of all these arguments already, but if we just accept nothing is free running then explain the universe or the atom?   Like so many churches,  lol here lol there,  we are right they are wrong    blargh!  If you have ANY case where a formula does not work then is that formula correct?  PI is even flawed and it is nearly the most common formula we use daily.  So when people tell you things realize they were taught to believe this and many were.  But if all cases can not be solved using the formula then figure out the better tool.  Don't say it can't work just because your ego is impaled and you can't solve it.  But don't take is so personally, after all you may have been taught an incomplete science to keep you in a box.


And why attack me just for putting down information on flaws in our teaching system.   


Want to see something amazing,  watch a child playing with something totally new to them.  In a very short time they have it mastered,  they know the hows and whys and whens.  They are not full of this's and that's from others and when they are they are limited in what they try.   


So either go happily into paying all your utilities and accepting that is how it is or jump both feet into "pure learning, playing like a child" with your inspirations.  This is how dreams come into reality.   "It can't or I can't" never do.
You claimed to have a working free energy generator.  You lied.  You did not and you don't.  You falsely claim to know how to build a working free energy generator and offer to sell consultations on the construction of such a device for $300. / hour.  That is fraud.  Trying to ride on the coat tails of the faker John Hutchison does not help rehabilitate your reputation that you have destroyed with your lies.  Science is built on evidence, not wishes.

Let's see how much faith you have in your own claims:  Why don't you set a date beyond which you will rely solely on your machine running with no external power source for all of your electricity needs?

MarkE

Quote from: Hope on May 13, 2014, 04:02:52 AM

LOL  i have never claimed to have made such a machine.   Like most here who are serious I have worked on ideas hoping for a self runner.
But of course you have.  A self-running machine would be a working perpetual motion machine.  Are you unclear on what the words:  "self" and "runner" mean?

MarkE

Quote from: Hope on May 13, 2014, 04:08:01 AM

Which?   What claims the only thing I can remember not doing I said I would was make an outline for someone but they quit working on their project.   You are good at making false claims against others is all I can see.
You have claimed to have a QEG that self ran for at least 150 hours.  You have never had such a machine.