Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 112 Guests are viewing this topic.

e2matrix

Just wanted to add since this is a fairly hot topic that we have a full moon (Blood moon even) coming tomorrow night.   Ask any cop who has been around awhile how domestic violence increases during full moons.   I mention this because it seems things are heating up a bit in here so try to keep it civil.   that means you too steeltpu. 

MileHigh

Gentlemen:

I am not interested in any conflicts.  Based on what I observed from the beginning, I rendered my opinion.  Then the other day I made a long posting that was basically an editorial.  I lamented the fact that no proper measurements were made and that nobody speaks up about things like that.  If you guys don't demand a certain bare minimum of evidence when people present their free energy propositions, then this vicious circle will never stop.  I have said my piece, there is no need to repeat it.  I do not want to be an "issue" on this thread, the issue is the QEG and if it will ever come to fruition.

So I offer to help Luc and Woopy.  I raise the issue of checking for any remnant magnetism in the setup because if there is any remnant magnetism then the setup by definition will be a generator before you even make the first test.  I get beat down for suggesting the test.  Then I suggest using a compass to check for remnant magnetism and I get accused of trying to suggest a fake test that is a setup to fail.  It's not true and I post the proper test.  I use the word "we" and I am accused of having a multiple personality.  I am only human, and I can't know about all of the information about the QEG project.  I mention the 4 kilowatt output test and lack of information about it and I am accused of being a liar.  That crossed a line for me.

This is all ridiculous.  I am not an issue here and I have no desire whatsoever to be an issue.

Now, if in a week or two, somebody posts a video clip and claims over unity and the measurements aren't even done or they are done improperly, I may post that observation.  But it shouldn't only be me, you guys should be saying the same thing.

MileHigh

e2matrix

MH,  I think you know this but I'll say it anyway.   The idea behind the QEG is that it will be self running once it is started and flipped over to it's own power without any batteries needed or external power.   So as far as measurements go they won't really be needed once they have a fully working QEG video up it will be obvious there is free energy if it can run itself and even power one light bulb.    The only need for measurement of output would be to let us know how much is available to run external devices. 
    If you are instead referring to the tests some people are doing here to validate the basic concept then yes correct measurements are needed.
    Having seen the latest QEG update video though it seems they have found the resonance point starts producing by far the most output when using higher voltage.  He was talking 500-600 volts or more with the likely greater output power coming at 1000 to 2000 volts.   The output then needs to be stepped down with a transformer or high voltage inverter.   So they have a few new challenges in regards to winding insulation to handle the higher voltages and designing an inverter to step down to the correct voltage and frequency (which he indicated is not hard for an inverter company or engineer to design and something I believe he said he would try doing when he gets time).   
   After seeing that video I sense NO deception at all from the main engineer but rather concern for getting all the challenges resolved as quickly as possible.   Considering the amount of work and effort he is putting into this I find it hard to believe he would even have started this without thoroughly checking out what Witts or Thrapp had to make sure it was indeed a working device.    In the past I had concluded the Witts device built by Thrapp was possibly fake but I do not believe that is the case now. 

Rfacts

gotoluc:
Thanks for your input on the idea that I posted to test QEG effects, it's good to get technical and fabrication feedback from you and others.  It had not occurred to me that cutting/machining transformer cores will cause them to swell if laminates are not compressed tightly due to the fine metal fillings creeping in between laminations, good thing to know ahead of time to save time and material cost. 

In your recent videos we saw the high voltages that you generated with your MOT test setup and it was reported that high voltage arcing caused winding damage in Taiwan which required rewinding.  The primary winding capacitance is speced for 25kV and James Robitaille reported in the last Taiwan update video that they were now temporarily using a spark plug as a spark gap to protect this windings from arc damage.  He has also concluded that the right way to do it is to vacuum impregnate the windings of the QEG toroid to prevent the arc damage.  I state this because I have a real interest in learning more about this high voltage effect.  I'll PM you about any help I can provide you to conduct further testing.

Others With Technical Interest:
In a recent video James Robitaille states that he tried hundreds of capacitor combinations before he achieved high voltage at high RPM resonance, so no question this effect alone will be a challenge to replicate while testing with different cores, windings and configurations.  I'm interested in reviewing a detailed technical description from someone with good technical knowledge as to how this high voltage is build up and generated with no magnets, no rotor windings, and no external power based on the FTW QEG toroid configuration. 

I understand that residual/low level magnetism could play a role in combination with the primary resonant LC circuit (L=30-40H and C=0.125uF) but could parametric oscillation with the varying inductance parameter be playing a role in achieving 20+kV?  Is the high RPM required to generate short pulses which will abruptly collapse the field?  I'm also puzzled as to how the reported output frequency of ~400Hz is achieved with a single bar rotor and a 4 pole toroid at a rotor RPM of 1330-1450?  Is electrical resonance playing a greater role than mechanical action/resonance? 

No QEG data has been provided that would help explain the high voltage effect at the reported output frequency.  I see no alternative to better understand it than by way of experimental testing - and a good technical description of how the high 20+kV is generated would help us better understand it and the tuning involved thus also help replicate it.

MoRo


The QEG is based upon Nikola Tesla's patent #511,916.


Therein, Tesla states:
QuoteI have shown and described a form of engine invented by me, which, under the influence of an applied force such as the elastic tension of steam or a gas under pressure, yields an oscillation of constant period.


A spring or a pendulum, once set into oscillation, requires very little energy input to maintain an isochronous [Equal in duration or interval] oscillation.


Tesla worded it this way in his patent:
QuoteIt is a well known mechanical principle that if a spring possessing a sensible inertia be brought under tension, as by being stretched, and then freed, it will perform vibrations which are isochronous, and as to period, in the main, dependent upon the rigidity of the spring, and its own inertia or that of the system of which it may form an immediate part. This is known to be true in all cases where the force which tends to bring the spring or movable system into a given position is proportionate to the displacement.


Joseph Newman stated that his experiments proved to him that:
QuoteMagnetic fields consist of particles which have mechanical characteristics.


I believe the above statement to be incorrect, only that it should be correctly stated in the following way:


Magnetic fields are formed by particles which have mechanical characteristics.


I believe atoms are those particles.


Newman also asserts the following:
QuoteThe prior teachings indicate that copper is non-magnetic and that the resulting magnetic field associated with current flow in copper is the result of the current. Those teachings are totally wrong. Copper is extremely magnetic! It is so magnetic that it deceives the observer.


This, I believe to be true. And furthermore, I also believe that it is atom alignment that has to do with any detectable magnetic polarity within a section of wire or core material.


It becomes evident that it is atomic alignment that causes a magnetic field during an applied voltage.
1.) During atomic realignment (from an applied voltage), a moving magnetic field can be detected until the atoms reach their tension point.
2.) If the voltage is slowly removed then the tension on the atoms is also gradually removed and the magnetic field can be seen to gradually collapse.
3.) If the voltage is inverted then one can detect the magnetic field polarity reversal. This means that the atoms are under tension in the opposite direction.


NOW, HERE IS A KEY INGREDIENT THAT CAN MAKE THE PUZZLE COMPLETE.
4.) If the applied voltage is instantly removed from a coil of wire, then what happens?
Does the magnetic field merely drop to zero?
or
Does it oscillate between positive and negative polarities until it drops to zero?


If the latter is true then this means that the atoms and their alignment in a coil of copper wire or in a core ARE like a spring under tension! And, If this is true then merely finding and then resonating the atomic alignment of the spring-like atoms will produce an alternating magnetic field that will in turn produce an AC current.


A piece of steal will attract either pole of a magnet. It is easy to demonstrate how a bar magnet attached to its center-point by a spring can be made to oscillate by cyclically bringing a peace of steel near it each time the poles reverse in a pendulum-like motion.


Can the same be reproduced in a piece of core material with the individual atoms that it is made up of?


Food for thought!


Maybe someone out there can test this out.


MagnaMoRo