Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[markdansie]

Yes, but does that sample of engineers and investors include any of the people in WITTS Ministries' overunity independent verifications videos?

Those can be seen at http://www.youtube.com/user/WITTS2014

Regards,

VIDBID

Those video's are a joke and none of those demonstrations could be reproduced live for any visiting engineers, scientists and more importantly investors. Videos are never accepted as evidence. I have seen videos faked that even fooled highly qualified engineers, nothing like a third party validation or live demonstration.
Kind Regards
Mark


PS
why does someone not ask a simple question of Witts or the QEG team, have they got something that can demonstrate overunity?? lol

[gotoluc]

Hi all

Just tried something after Gyula information on the Russian(Lanarev )  paper from 1934 , where a crossing alu plate. decreases the inductance of 2 facing coil.

And it seems that by variation of inductance, Increasing it or decreasing it, generate some electricity

And  , by doing it, also seems not to submitted to Lenz    perhaps   

My 2 cents

http://youtu.be/gukCFm81K7k

laurent

Merci Laurent,

great video demo!

believe it or not, 5 years ago I discovered a coils inductance could be reduce with Aluminum.  I never thought of a practical application

Thanks for your demo

Luc

[PiCéd]

I know how much dificult is to lift an alter of 15 kg to 1 meter in one second with only one hand, so if somebody could produce better more than 15 joules per second with a sort of electric machine with is hand without any dificulty to turn the generator, he won.

[gotoluc]

gotoluc:

I really appreciate all of your experimental efforts and sharing of your results.  I think many more than you're aware of benefit from the work you openly share.  We learn something from every experiment whether we conduct it ourselves or if it is conducted by someone else who provides the configuration, test protocol and the data needed to replicate the experiment like you do.  You learn whether your results are as you expected or not.  Richard Feynman put it best: The test of all knowledge is experiment.

Your builds are professional and you stand out because you like to confirm things for yourself without letting negative comments deter you from your experimental work.  At times both sides resort to sniping, name calling and sarcasm that is not constructive, it discourages those of us that may have something productive to contribute.  Yet you remain open minded to glean what you can from both sides, bravo!  Kudos to woopy too!  You can't beat hands-on experimental work to learn while enjoying the building experience, but even though both sides have something positive to contribute you do sometimes have to filter out the unproductive background noise.

I'm encouraged by your open and objective approach to post an idea that I had which also makes use of microwave oven transformer cores and would like to know what you think.  I'm attaching a drawing that I made of a QEG Experimental Test Unit to test the effects by utilizing 2 or 3 MOT cores.  I think it would eliminate the flexing problem you're having while bringing it closer to the original QEG toroid design and allows use of bobbins to test with different coil configurations.  One unit design requires three MOT E core pieces of the same size to maintain the same rotor dimensions and other rotor designs would only require two MOTs because one of the left over I core pieces would be used to make two variations of a rotor at the more narrow width of the I core piece.  Some core machining would be required but it may be worth a try.

Also wanted to point out that James Robitaille stated in the recently posted PESN video interview at the 28:00 minute mark that he tested his QEG configuration at the lower frequencies that you're testing at but found that the QEG growled and beat itself up and he didn't think it would last so he stayed away from the low RPMs.  In the QEG Taiwan Update video that was posted today at the 13:00 minute mark James Robitaille states that he is still using a primary LC capacitance of 0.125uF and achieved smooth resonance in Taiwan at a rotor RPM of 1331, he had reported that the first QEG he built back home achieved smooth resonance at 1450 RPM which he considered to be about mid power band and that the QEG will operate on harmonics.

Thanks and as lasersaber well puts it, let's keep experimenting.

Thanks Rfacts for taking the time to write and share your ideas.

It looks to be a good idea. A machine shop service would be needed to cut the circular shapes.  Also, I don't know if you're aware but cutting steel laminations that are already together in a block is not as easy as some may think.  It needs to be held tight in a vice while cutting, if not, the fine metal filling will work their way in between laminations  and your core will look like particle board that got wet.
I would say it would be well worth the investment if we could confirm the effect.
Myself, I have zero income, so I can't do much more then use what I have on hand. My simple test device cost me a $16. part (chain gear) the rest I recycled from things I had.
If someone is willing to pay for the transformers, machining, bearings, shaft, side supports pulleys and belt I'm willing to put my time in for free.

I know about what James Robitaille stated but so far I have not found the correct capacitance to get a powerful resonance effect at a higher frequency. I can't use the uf value he used because my Inductance 12 Henry is lower than his 40 Henry. I'll keep trying and post if I find anything new.

Luc

[vidbid]

Those video's are a joke..

That's why I said the people. Clearly, the people who show their faces in those videos at http://www.witts.ws/verifications/ aren't a joke.

However, I will concede that the following video appears to be a joke IMHO, and granted, that doesn't help WITTS' credibility.

http://youtu.be/vCbZ3CRWx7I

Regards,

VIDBID