Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[vidbid]

..as well as having feedback from other engineers and investors who have also met him over many years, I can assure you that none of us ever saw or was convinced in anyway he had any overunity devices.

Yes, but does that sample of engineers and investors include any of the people in WITTS Ministries' overunity independent verifications videos?

Those can be seen at http://www.youtube.com/user/WITTS2014

Regards,

VIDBID

[PiCéd]

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Free_Energy_Blog:2014:04:10#German_Group_achieves_QEG_resonance
Is their support voltage capacitors, because if they have a big quality factor in series  it may be causing the decrease is due to the fact that the capacitors will not longer support a certain voltage.

[gyulasun]

Hi all

Just tried something after Gyula information on the Russian(Lanarev )  paper from 1934 , where a crossing alu plate. decreases the inductance of 2 facing coil.

And it seems that by variation of inductance, Increasing it or decreasing it, generate some electricity

And  , by doing it, also seems not to submitted to Lenz    perhaps   

My 2 cents

http://youtu.be/gukCFm81K7k

laurent

Hi Laurent,

The question of Lenz (though it is not easy) could be figured out from the Lazarev paper,  PDF page 6,  where Foucault current is mentioned: it is eddy current which is induced in the rotating Aluminium plate, just like as Alu disks are used in utility electric power meters.     Quote from page 6:
"The aggregate loss data, via self-induction, represents the total loss in the winding, the iron cores used, and the disk. It then becomes especially necessary to address the question of losses originating in the disk. The role of the disk consists of putting energy into the system. The Foucault currents along the disk's teeth, which interact with the currents of the coils, causes the teeth to be pushed out from the group of coils. In other words, a tooth "standing" in between coils does not convert energy, and pushing "against" the coils is labile and does convert energy. Hence while the teeth are standing in between the coils, the system possesses an energy minimum, while the in the second position a maxima. When transitioning from the first stance (in between coils) to the second, we expend mechanical energy, and obtain operation E1. And backward, at the next transition, from a labile equilibrium in a non-convertible system would be to return energy E2. The total amount of energy that had been acquired during the system's transition from the first equilibrium stage to that left by the second stage will be equal to  ΔE = E₁ - E₂  > 0.   This equation is enacted due to the establishment of a corresponding phase of the position between coil current and a standing disk in space. On the other hand, the disk is a main constituent of the entire vibrating system, and we should not import to it greater current losses, as the requirement of self-excitation (Equation 3 in page 2) otherwise will not be satisfied. In other words, the
relaxation time of the disk should not be less than a certain [specified] quantity."     Unquote


I figure that instead of using Alu disk with teeth, perhaps using flat ferrite rods placed radially onto a non magnetic disk (I mean the flat AM antenna ferrite pieces used in pocket AM radio receivers, often called 'loopstick') so that the alternating gaps and flat ferrite-ends at the outer perimeter of the rotor disk could also change the inductance of the facing coils BUT with a minimal eddy current loss.  I know this is a more expensive solution than the cheap Alu disk but eddy loss is not our friend... At ebay there are such flat ferrite rods and no need for long ferrite pieces, the size is defined by the gap siize (cross section of the facing coil cores)
Using laminated core in the gap may sound also good but one has to consider the direction of the flux hitting the laminations in a normal transformer and in such setups: perhaps the eddy loss increases in such setups

The use of flat ferrite pieces is a suggestion of course, not aimed to do by you or someone else, I just think to avoid or minimize
eddy current losses and actually what is needed for changing periodically the inductance of coils is to cause permeability change, hence L inductance change in the tank coils at a minimal loss level possible. 


For those not yet read the Lazarev paper, here is the link, and choose paper #3 "On Hetero-Parametric Excitation": http://www.nedyn.com/para.html 

Gyula

PS: Laurent, if I noticed it correctly, you left the L meter on the coils when you run the rotor disk? this may influence the induced oscillating level across your tank coils.

[PiCéd]

Just tried something after Gyula information on the Russian(Lanarev )  paper from 1934 , where a crossing alu plate. decreases the inductance of 2 facing coil.

It's good to know that, maybe it would mean that the energy is stored in the alu plate like a sort of capacitor.

[PiCéd]

The only question is that in these conditions the generator that feeds the input is easier or as easy to turn that than without the alu plate?