Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[vidbid]

VIDBID, do you think it's ethical for someone to promote a project and solicit and collect funds for it, over a hundred thousand dollars already that we know about, based on false claims of already having a prototype that produces overunity performance? When there is absolutely no evidence that the design actually works as claimed? And even the claimants now are finding that they cannot produce the performance advertised?

Notice that this is a different question than "does it, or can it, work".

Do you think it is ethical to criticize people for not allowing comments on their videos?

Regards,

VIDBID

[markdansie]

1. How are you defining the term "worked" and according to who's claim? I don't know what you or the unnamed individuals to whom you refer would consider a convincing demonstration.


The unnamed are under NDA with Witts (so will remain so). Worked means produced more output energy than input energy (direct or stored)

2. What are your criteria for a working demonstration of what you are referring to?


Measuring more output energy than input energy (simple)

3. What exactly are you referring to?


You measure the volts and amps in and measure either the mechanical or electrical energy out

4. I also believe understanding what you mean depends on how you are defining the term "working".


Working means as claimed...more energy out than in

5. Who exactly are "they" that you are referring to?


Scientist, engineers, investors and representatives for the investors

Regards,

VIDBID

So have you tested or viewed a WITTS device first hand "
Kind Regards
Mark

[vidbid]

I believe that James indicates that the exciter resonates when 600v is in series with it.

http://youtu.be/2nTgfrjnZEY?t=5m53s

Is that what he is saying?

Regards,

VIDBID

[vidbid]

So have you tested or viewed a WITTS device first hand "
Kind Regards
Mark

Did you operate and disassemble the WITTS QEG to see how it worked?

Regards,

VIDBID

[markdansie]

Did you operate and disassemble the WITTS QEG to see how it worked?

Regards,

VIDBID

That was never allowed for good reason......I think you can figure out why lol.
I have been involved in many other failed devices that were pulled apart.
The onus is not on me to prove it worked or did not work, but those making the claims. Without supporting data, evidence or otherwise then their is no supported claim. We have already seen the QED go form a Free Energy device that was claimed to be operational to something that has fallen well short of providing any excess energy. It is fine to have development projects, but call them that from the start.
Kind Regards
Mark