Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 76 Guests are viewing this topic.

F_Brown

A new and improved animation of the QEG core flux gating is now available:

http://youtu.be/fGRFoADcNq

ACG

Quote from: Loner on April 25, 2014, 01:20:44 AM
I just have to jump in here for a second, as this is getting "Disturbing".

After really looking at the schematic for a few seconds, and making the "Assumption" that the output is standard, useable power (Not something unusual or undefined so that standard measurements and operation of standard devices would be good.), then I see a small problem.  The spark gap IS in series with the output, with a smallish cap and inductor both in parallel with it.  This gives me great pause.

1.  Lots of noise will be in this output, no matter what, even if the freq range were partly filtered by the torrid.
2.  Putting that much power through a spark gap......  Has anyone heard of this thing called an Arc Welder......
3.  Even assuming that one could bypass most of this power around the gap, through the cap and coil, I don't see where the coil pictured (or spec'd...) would be able to be of low enough inductance to allow that much to pass.  The cap, I don't see that even more so.

What this really means to me is;  either the power at this point is NOT standard power, which would make all current SIMS, etc.  very useless and prevent simple use of that power  OR  someone has a neat idea but no real concept of what it really is.

And just to be clear, for those that haven't spent a lot of time with this stuff, ANY COP > 1, even if, say 1.000000000000001, would also have to be considered infinite COP.  Why, you ask?  Over COP 1 could be looped, meaning NO INPUT Required.  What happens when you divide by zero?  (OK, you all know this, but....)

So, we have some facts, here.   I have NO idea what they are.  I can't imagine anyone giving money or time away on this, but could not complain about playing with it on your own, just for the experience.   Either way, with the lack of data, and no real verification of the REAL ckt or specs, and not having built one, I certainly could not state for certain that it worked or not.  I could only state, right now, that if I build it exactly as shown and wire it exactly according to schematic, there is no possible way that it could operate at COP>1 as long as ONLY conventional EM theory was in use.  This eliminate SIMS for full explanations, if they exist.

If it DID operate over COP=1 THEN there would have to be quite a few additions to quite a few texts.  In reality, no one should be ready to accept that so quickly without some firm proofs.  Will this device be the one to open that can of worms?  I have no idea, but It should be interesting to watch (Read?).

For myself, I would prefer to see the theoretical information explained or demonstrated in a much simpler/cheaper/easier form for the initial "Breakthrough", but then again   What do I know about the blurring between aether concepts and quantum theory..... 

(Even the title.  Both of this thread AND the device.  Is it becoming accepted that quantum theory is describing the aether?  Or is that connection being ignored?  Or is no-one even seeing the large gap between those two?  I may very well be totally wrong, but my first thought upon looking at the overall concept would have to be that this draws in aether energy, rather than utilizing quantum entanglement, if it really worked.)

OK, that's enough of my blabbing about things I know nothing about.  In certain ways, I AM a psudohuman, and as such should have no opinion.

I would be interested if someone could mention a method to get 10-15KW through that exciter Ckt, using Conventional, Real power (Not Reactive, etc.) because without that initial understanding, I would be lost as to what was really coming out of the device.  (I hope I am making sense....)

I have been waiting for someone to come along and talk about this magical QUANTUM exciter.  For it is the only Quantum part of the design.  Real problem is the manual is a fishing lure to conjure funding.  Not meant to be analyzed or replicated.  The completely unrelated Tesla patent was tossed in there for show.  The narrative changed from 60hz 240v 42A output in the manual (even 85A stated) to 400hz 2kv 5A output in the conferences.

A link at the serious multi level marketing perspective of the QEG: At 12:50 to save time http://youtu.be/dRstvWGuABM?t=12m50s
Straight to the business, do not pass go, do not collect 200.

TinselKoala

Quote from: F_Brown on April 25, 2014, 10:48:31 PM
A new and improved animation of the QEG core flux gating is now available:

http://youtu.be/fGRFoADcNq

I get a "An error occurred during validation.This video does not exist" error. Sorry about that...

F_Brown

My bad.  I guess I dropped the last "o" when I copied the link the first time. 

The video is working on YT.  Here's a good link:

http://youtu.be/fGRFoADcNqo


TinselKoala

Quote from: F_Brown on April 26, 2014, 11:16:13 AM
My bad.  I guess I dropped the last "o" when I copied the link the first time. 

The video is working on YT.  Here's a good link:

http://youtu.be/fGRFoADcNqo

Thanks for correcting the link. I put this comment on the video.... I won't be surprised, or offended, if you remove it!

---begin YT comment---

Did you expect to see something different? Don't you have any shaded pole synchronous AC motors in your home?

I think you are doing good work with FEMM. You are showing that the simulated device performs exactly as expected. But of course FEMM and all other simulation programs are based on ordinary standard physics, so they won't be able to show you any "free energy" or "overunity" performance. Remember Ibison's Law!

You can optimize all you like, but you can't make this thing produce output power sufficient to loop back to the drive motor for self-running. There is neither theoretical nor empirical support for that, the QEG people do not now and never have had a unit that does, and the version that Timothy Thrapp showed "running" years ago is a fake.

Whether you know it or not, you are participating in a cynical scam, by giving credence to the FTW "saviours of mankind". In a week, a month, a year from now, there will still be no self-running device from those people. But I encourage you to keep on, just try to stay away from the Dark Side of the Force. Asking for donations? Fine... as long as you aren't making unsupported, and unsupportable, claims, like the QEG people are making in their pleas for money.

--- end YT comment---