Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 47 Guests are viewing this topic.

NoBull

Quote from: MarkE on May 06, 2014, 08:39:31 AM
QuoteQ: "A magnet is pulled out of a shorted superconducting aircoil.  Does the magnitude of the final current induced in that coil depend on how quickly the magnet is pulled out ?".
The answer is yes...

@MarkE

I am sorry but you are wrong.


I talked to Professor John Belcher from MIT Department of Physics and his answer to this question was "no".

Inspired by his statements I made a small experiment with a tiny NdFeB cylindrical magnet (OD 3mm, TH 4mm) to avoid flux pinning and a $100 superconducting SrOCaBiCuP hollow tube (model CST-15) from CAN Superconductors.
http://shop.can-superconductors.com/category.php?id_category=12


I "froze" the superconducting tube with LN while the magnet was inside it.  The magnet was superglued to a plastic rod (positioned on tube's axis) and I removed it from the superconducting tube with different speeds to a large distance (2m).
The final magnetic flux density (measured by a Hall probe when the magnet was away) inside and near the superconducting tube was always the same regardless of the speed and path that the magnet took during its removal ...and thus the final current flowing in the tube must have been the same, too.

verpies

Did you try to measure the attraction force that the SC ring exerted on the departing magnet as a function of distance?
If "yes", did the F(d) function varied with speed of the magnet?

NoBull

Sorry, I did not - it was just a quick mock-up with a loaned superconducting tube that I had to return before the lab closed.  I had no time for time-consuming plots of force vs. distance.
However I can write that the force felt constant to my hand and it seemed to be independent of magnet's speed.

MarkE

Quote from: NoBull on May 15, 2014, 07:22:27 PM
The answer is yes...


@MarkE

I am sorry but you are wrong.
Yes the mistake that I made and acknowledged further in the thread is that I failed to account for the integration.  Faster speed yields a higher di/dt, but T is proportionally smaller.
Quote


I talked to Professor John Belcher from MIT Department of Physics and his answer to this question was "no".

Inspired by his statements I made a small experiment with a tiny NdFeB cylindrical magnet (OD 3mm, TH 4mm) to avoid flux pinning and a $100 superconducting SrOCaBiCuP hollow tube (model CST-15) from CAN Superconductors.
http://shop.can-superconductors.com/category.php?id_category=12


I "froze" the superconducting tube with LN while the magnet was inside it.  The magnet was superglued to a plastic rod (positioned on tube's axis) and I removed it from the superconducting tube with different speeds to a large distance (2m).
The final magnetic flux density (measured by a Hall probe when the magnet was away) inside and near the superconducting tube was always the same regardless of the speed and path that the magnet took during its removal ...and thus the final current flowing in the tube must have been the same, too.

Acca

 To all:

I have just posted another loopback power generator here on the QEG thread as to get  "free energy" experts to express more opinions why this works as well as my  previous post of mine was ignored  ( ??  Maybe it's possible that the free energy experts are gagging as they just are too mute to answer.. 

Well !!! lost your  enthusiasim to discredit this also ??? 

I am sick of the petty fighting here !! Grow up !! unless your are a kid here...

QuoteTo memoryman thanks !!
here is one for you.. it's "hydraulic" also....


QuoteTo: centraflow / Mike,
thanks for the great comment !!

You will have to get to Valencia and get specifics on these generators as the fate of the world will depend on making these power generators by the millions, it will solve human problem of over population..  and I am NOT making light of this situation.. I have cousins in Spain also.. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-Bg3cfdnCM&feature=youtu.be

QuoteThanks Sterling, A. for this post..

http://pesn.com/2014/05/15/9602500_FOUND--350kVA-QMoGen_by_AG-Energies-India-Pvt-Ltd/

AG Energies India Pvt Ltd is an Indian company, which produces pollution free hydraulic cylinder power generator, is an alternate energy which uses less fuel requires minimum space for installation at an attractive price.[/color]
[/color]
This pollution free hydraulic cylinder power generator, for the first time in history, a hydraulic cylinder is being used for obtaining a circular or rotary motion, which can be obtained either vertically or horizontally, depending upon the configuration of the machine.[/color]

This Invention is about an alternate power generating unit which is Fuel Less, Cost Effective & Pollution Free. It is very effective way of Generating Energy which does not consume any fuel and is Pollution free, as compared to the present conventional methods of generating energy, which are very expensive and at the same time pollute the atmosphere. There may be several methods of generating power; however none of these are not cost effective, as this newly developed Power Generating Unit. This Invention is a boon for the rural segment in particular and remote areas, such as hilly regions where installation is very difficult.[/color]

Acca.....