Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[descripttime]

Hi MileHigh
Thanks for your messages 1038, 1039 and 1041. I followed your argumentation, and I will try to induce some more technical hope towards that kind of electromagnetic device.
I am not sure if I understood the configuration of your virtual exciter coil (is it spinning or wound on the toroid somewhere ?) but anyway your argumentation is based on a conventional analysis mixing normal alternator behaviour (with Lenz law unavoidable) and variable reluctance or flux switch alternator (used in aircrafts, but none replicated, to my knowledge, showing overunit energetic balance).
However, other researchers in the past have demonstrated that when you have simultaneously variable reluctance, relatively quick varying current di/dt in the coil(s), and mechanical movement (for example of a ferromagnetic pole piece) you can tap non conventional energy (aether energy, ZPE, the name is not important).
For example, you might want to check this article which is written by a serious researcher:
http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/jap77.pdf
Osamu Ide is no fancy charlatan, he has also applied for a patent on a super-efficient inverter (alleged to be 400% O.U. in other publications, not in the patent), you might want to give a look; it is a static device, however:
http://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_CH&FT=D&date=20130522&CC=EP&NR=2595300A1&KC=A1
you have also this link (mentioned by a member of this forum, if I remember right) where a non scammer researcher (Art Porter) is disclosing practically all the details of a > 200% prototype based also on variable reluctance:
http://gap-power.com
and I had a regretted friend in Europe who developed an improved version of the Raymond Kromrey's machine. He could achieve 138%.
These mentioned devices are not parametric; when you add this effect, you can obtain better COPs, but for this, you must increase the voltage and the frequency (as the effect is proportional to the square of the LC tank voltage and the square of the frequency).
I do not say it is easy task to get high COPs with such electromagnetic devices. Trying to explain their operation with conventional physics is a dead end, and there is no consistent new theory able to predict those effects, only preliminary attempts. And please, a recommendation to all who still are citing the 1st principle of energy conservation to say that free energy is impossible: this 1st principle is only valid for closed systems... has somebody seen already a closed system ? just a closed mental fiction... think about nuclear energy; in 1850, it did not exist... in 1950, it is obvious... because the systems and the minds were opened !
There are also many losses mechanisms in electromagnetic machines. Much research and skill is needed to decrease them. But of course with a cut and try amateur way like James is doing, no wonder he gets 35%.
Best, descripttime.

[PCB]

PCB,

Here is a proposed posting for you:

Unfortunately this is a false alarm and the QEG is not producing over unity.  You do not use the peak-to-peak values for the voltage and the current measurements for the light bulb load to measure the power dissipation.  The correct way to do it is to use one-half of the peak-to-peak values and then multiply them by 0.7071.  This gives you what is called the "RMS" (Root Mean Square) values for the voltage and current.

The power dissipated in the light bulb load is Vrms x Irms.

The reason you use RMS values is because this factors in the fact that higher voltages (or currents) give you disproportionally higher power dissipation levels.

1900 volts peak-to-peak, divided by two equals 950 volts.
950 volts times 0.7071 gives you 671.7 volts RMS
0.95 amps peak-to-peak divided by two gives you 0.475 amps.
0.475 amps times 0.7071 gives you 0.3359 amps RMS.
671.7 Volts RMS x 0.3359 Amps RMS = 226 watts
The electric motor is drawing 655 watts of power.
Therefore the efficiency of the QEG is 226/655 x 100 = 34.5%.

Thanks, I very much appreciate you taking time to write this. Having most of the day to ruminate about this, perhaps what would be more powerful is to reverse things and calculate backwards, starting with a real power output of 10 KW. What would be the V_p-p on the secondary and on the primary given 5 Amps at the output (limits of the gauge of wired used)?  I think that the primary voltage would not be achievable due to breakdown. The core is being reworked for higher voltages, even so I'm sure that the voltage levels would be way too high even for the new core. Approaching things from this angle might get more attention from Jamie etal, and others following the QEG story on the Internet. What do you think?

[TinselKoala]

I read somewhere that HopeGirl (a.k.a "Hope Moore") is James' daughter.  I don't know more than reading it just once.

Daughter, or wife? Sterling's web page gives several links to her blog and donation pages and calls her his wife. Which probably means she's really his daughter.

I believe that the claim of free energy is still up on her blog with the donate button, way more than 24 hours after the claim.  I can't believe that James and HopeGirl don't talk several times a day.  So I have no faith in James.  Not that I had faith in him before as I posted a week ago.  I doesn't fit for me.  I don't believe in James the patsy.

Yes, the lying claims are still up and people are still donating by the minute.

For MarkE, yes yes yes!  Great idea with the step-down transformer then the variac then the big fat power resistor.  That gives you a big fat AC load where you can dial in the impedance!  Freaking awesome man!

See then we could all sit around the QEG like boy scouts and toast free energy marshmallows over the resistor and sing Kumbayah!

MileHigh

MOT.

Rip apart a microwave oven, use the transformer's 2kV winding as the "primary" by hooking it directly to the output of the QEG. It will work on 400 Hz, just not quite as efficiently as on 50-60 Hz, but MOTs are not designed for efficiency anyway, they are designed to be cheap to make.
Now you can draw off high-amperage 120 or 220 VAC from the "secondary" of the MOT. Run your Variac on this output and then go and light up your load bank of bulbs. 

[TinselKoala]

@descripttime: none of the "overunity" devices you mention have been self-looped to function without any external source of power. Why is that? I know for an absolute fact that if someone shows me a 200 percent OU electrical device, I can take the output power, store and convert it to whatever the input power requirement is, and make it run itself. I believe from your posts that you probably have the knowledge to do this too. Even a 138 percent OU electrical device should be capable of self-looping, because conversion losses can be made very small with good design. For example, a QMo-Gen that makes 38 percent more output power than input should be easily self-looped, because the drive motor can be as much as 90 or more percent efficient in turning input power to torque.

So if you want to claim that those devices and measurements are real and valid.... you should also be able to explain why none of them have ever been self-looped... and why their inventors are still paying electric bills on their homes.

[MileHigh]

PCB,

Please check back to my posting again.  I improved the prose and made it clearer.  I don't think working back from 10 kilowatts is something to mention now.  Perhaps in a week or so if the posting stirs up controversy and you still have posting privileges.  I suggest that you post my new improved version and see what happens.

There is a chance that the posting will be deleted and you will be banned.  Such is life and the HopeStompers can't control the whole Internet.

MileHigh