Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 111 Guests are viewing this topic.

ACG

http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:QEG:FAQ
Q: Does the QEG run hot or cold when operating?

A: The QEG does not run hot. You can touch the motor and the bearings after you shut it down.

I am sure you can touch them, question is for how long of a run and how fast of a touch.  Notice the answer was motor and bearings.  2 factor deception.  The motor is not what is in question.  Should have answered with the rotor or the core.  The bearings are going to get warm regardless of any or no "quantum energy" being conducted from the zero point to the core.  Bearing operating temperature will be based on speed, load, and heat dissipation.  Is the qeg reducing its weight as it generates more power?  Is the qeg cooling down?  Was any temperature measurements even attempted as MileHigh suggested?

If the qeg team was interested in reducing core loss, they would source a lower M rating steel from the current M19 to M15 or M4.  May cost more.  But then again, its all paid for by donations.  Other than humming, shouting, gonging, and disseminating "LOCATION has Resonance!" videos I m not seeing any genuine research or engineering efforts.  They are only replicating the same over and over while expecting different results.

Remember stark believers, the original claim mentions NOTHING about VARS and reactive power.  The Pennsylvania prototype was tested up to 9.3k Watts and machine ran for different durations totaling 150 hours in the 4k Watt range.

MileHigh

ACG:

I can only agree with you.  I wonder if the Be-Doers are starting to get frustrated with the general state of affairs.  The recurring themes around here about no test data, lack of transparency, and coupled with the technical analysis suggested by the group and the associated recommended tests must be hitting home ("resonating") with the Be-Doers and the actual replicators.

Are we really such "evil" people for pointing out the obvious and using our common sense?

Are we really such "evil" people for discussing all sorts of technical issues about the QEG and proposing some logical testing protocols?

The people on the Be-Do forum have to start thinking about who the good guys really are and who the bad guys really are.

Plus, to all you Be-Doers out there reading this posting, aren't you feeling frustrated by the stifling atmosphere on your forum and the omnipresent sense of oppression and censorship?  Don't you just want to scream sometimes?

I am going to link and screen capture for the sample message on your forum below.  It's a chilling sample showing you the soft and really unpleasant underbelly on the Be-Do forum:

http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-construction/399-reasonable-questions-concerns-about-qeg-claims-and#1750

Whose interests are really being served on the Be-Do forum?  The world's interests or the interests of the Fix the World group?

MileHigh

Pirate88179

Quote from: MileHigh on June 29, 2014, 04:41:19 PM
ACG:

I can only agree with you.  I wonder if the Be-Doers are starting to get frustrated with the general state of affairs.  The recurring themes around here about no test data, lack of transparency, and coupled with the technical analysis suggested by the group and the associated recommended tests must be hitting home ("resonating") with the Be-Doers and the actual replicators.

Are we really such "evil" people for pointing out the obvious and using our common sense?

Are we really such "evil" people for discussing all sorts of technical issues about the QEG and proposing some logical testing protocols?

The people on the Be-Do forum have to start thinking about who the good guys really are and who the bad guys really are.

Plus, to all you Be-Doers out there reading this posting, aren't you feeling frustrated by the stifling atmosphere on your forum and the omnipresent sense of oppression and censorship?  Don't you just want to scream sometimes?

I am going to link and screen capture for the sample message on your forum below.  It's a chilling sample showing you the soft and really unpleasant underbelly on the Be-Do forum:

http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-construction/399-reasonable-questions-concerns-about-qeg-claims-and#1750

Whose interests are really being served on the Be-Do forum?  The world's interests or the interests of the Fix the World group?

MileHigh

Nice.  Banned for asking questions and seeking the truth.  Well, they can't have that now can they?

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

Rigel4

Quote from: ACG on June 29, 2014, 04:00:10 PM

Remember stark believers, the original claim mentions NOTHING about VARS and reactive power.  The Pennsylvania prototype was tested up to 9.3k Watts and machine ran for different durations totaling 150 hours in the 4k Watt range.
ACG you may have a spelling error, change durations to countless "donations", it makes more sense. From reading the articles, donations=resonance=OU.

ACG

How do you get (-) negative Karma?  Other than direct access to the database of course.  But why allow (-) on a forum that does not tolerate negativity  ;D