Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 81 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

So the UK build of the QEG is completed, then? It is sitting there running itself, like a completed FE device should do?

I am laughing in my coffee.

Etheric Tuning Device? Harmonic of the Pyramids? "According to WITTS"..... OMG, is the fate of the world really in the hands of people who cannot think their way out of a paper sack, much less out of the toothpaste aisle?



TinselKoala

Quote from: Farmhand on June 30, 2014, 05:38:29 AM
Nice work Tinsel, time for a funding campaign for you, sit back we'll do it all for ya.  ;) Just kidding.

But I can confirm the results you got are good but kinda normal, your setup is a lot more powerful than mine but the same effect is got.
I used a pair of small Tesla transformers with one driven by a "Armstrong oscillator" and with only a few watts input, 12 volts and about 400 mA current,
on the primary of the "transmitter" "in the tank" I was seeing about 40 volts RMS and about 5 amps of current, which made me smile
and say wow but I knew it was accumulated volts and amps, just as the contents of any tank is accumulated.
My voltage and current also appeared to be in phase but I was using a 0.1 Ohm CSR (5 Watts) and so I was not so sure of the accuracy of the
current trace.

Nice video well done.

..
Thanks!
A couple of different calculations have come up with a total impedance of around 2.8 ohms for the resistor I used at 630 kHz. This of course means that the p-p currents are 11/2.8 = a bit under 4 amps, which brings the computed output power down to... something just a little bit over the measured input power.
In is 11.83 V x 2.70 A = 31.9 W
Out is (68 V x 3.9 A)/8 =  33.2 W
... but the radiated power and the heating of the components still isn't taken into account.

;)

MileHigh

1.3 MHz would be a typical clock frequency for a 1976 or 1977 microprocessor.  Thank God they didn't all genlock together because it would have been the End Days.  "Zero Hour of the Microwave Ovens."

QuoteIn fact, according to WITTS, the exciter circuit can be removed after a couple of weeks of use because the QEG core has become conditioned and no longer needs it.

That information was the result of an $800 donation!  You have to knead your coils.

Great clip TK!  I have to confess that I have looked at past clips by you where I couldn't figure out how you did it.  Even this one has me mystified.  Consider that a high compliment!

MileHigh

TinselKoala

Quote from: MileHigh on June 30, 2014, 06:28:15 PM
1.3 MHz would be a typical clock frequency for a 1976 or 1977 microprocessor.  Thank God they didn't all genlock together because it would have been the End Days.  "Zero Hour of the Microwave Ovens."

That information was the result of an $800 donation!  You have to knead your coils.

Great clip TK!  I have to confess that I have looked at past clips by you where I couldn't figure out how you did it.  Even this one has me mystified.  Consider that a high compliment!

MileHigh
Thanks, but there's no "trickery" involved other than the same "trickery" used by the QEG measurements. The video is an illustration of measurement and interpretation error, just as the QEG "Overunity in VARs" videos and text reports are.

When the reactance of the power resistor used as CVR is taken into account, as above, the "OU" drops down into the instrumental measurement error range. I am currently setting up to repeat the demonstration but using the DSO to obtain more precise "numbers in boxes" and a commercial non-inductive resistor for the CVR (if it can handle the power). Inserting a resistor in series with the transmitting loop is not really a legit way to measure this circuit though, as the resistor messes up the tuning match and the thing isn't working fully well in that situation.


Farmhand

Just curious TK. Are you taking any output with any receiver ?

I figured using a very small resistance for the CSR would be better but I think in my case it made the voltage across the resistor quite small
and so I doubted my accuracy that way as well.