Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 67 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: PCB on July 20, 2014, 11:30:09 PM
TK: If you do not object I'd like to post this over at be-do as a solid state alternative to the mechanical QEG with a request that it be up scaled to 10 KW. The world needs to know about this incredible breakthrough. He he! Oh but you are not taking things seriously enough with the posted description, so best not. Interesting that the  I & V in the primary are nearly in phase, do you have an explanation for that?

Interesting info from BLP. Not very significant, but innnteresting.  (trike falls over)   ;)



Meanwhile, the measurement problem represented by my microQEG video has generated some controversy, as I knew it would. A few people have picked up on the presence of a "trick" or error that causes the phase angle to look so small. The question that we must ask is whether or not the QEG teams are making the same "error" or trick with their reports of OU in VARs.  I myself simply do not have enough information about their "open source" procedures to know if they are or not. 
Is their Stangenes CT oriented properly? Does the Fluke or other Current Clamp probe introduce a time delay phase difference and have the teams "de-skewed" their active probes in the scope's internal settings?  Is one or more of their scope channels inverted? Do they actually know how to measure large or small phase shifts, so as to include the "cos theta" term in their Real Power calculations from the measured p-p values they are getting?  I just don't know.

I realize now that I should have "disabled comments" on the original MicroQEG video. That would have been true to form, emulating the FTW-QEG style as closely as possible. Too late now, I suppose.

Here is Part 1 of the "reveal" or explanation of the phase measurement problem using Current Transformers for monitoring current in a reactive system. Part 1 just explains what we are talking about, for the folks who might not be completely clear on what "phase shift" means and how it looks on a scope. Part 2, ready later on this evening, will apply the knowledge to demonstrate and explain the measurement pitfall "trick" or error that resulted in the microQEG's apparent small phase shift.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zq_NWxyL8ro

PCB

TK: I'm waiting with interest to hear more about the measurement problem. Very insightful. Doing a spice simulation of your circuit. Going to ground it to make it a true OU Tesla machine.

I feel like I'm watching cubs build the school girl motor.  http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/active-qeg-builders-cicus/519-transverter-for-qeg  I think this provides quit a bit of insight into the technical prowess of be-do developers.  Its might be time to move on and let the gong banging QEGers do their thing in peace. When folks wake up to BLP in the next few months this, Rossi and the rest will be blown aside. You heard it here first.  I might be going out on a bit of of limb, and I know there are many doubters, but Mills is going to give the world of Physics one mighty headache.

MarkE

Quote from: PCB on July 21, 2014, 11:47:49 PM
TK: I'm waiting with interest to hear more about the measurement problem. Very insightful. Doing a spice simulation of your circuit. Going to ground it to make it a true OU Tesla machine.

I feel like I'm watching cubs build the school girl motor.  http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/active-qeg-builders-cicus/519-transverter-for-qeg  I think this provides quit a bit of insight into the technical prowess of be-do developers.  Its might be time to move on and let the gong banging QEGers do there thing in piece. When folks wake up to BLP in the next few months this, Rossi and the rest will be blown aside. You heard it here first.  I might be going out on a bit of of limb, and I know there are many doubters, but Mills is going to give the world of Physics one mighty headache.
Based on history you are going out on quite a long limb.  It would be wonderful if Mills could deliver.  The problem is that his science is really, really bad. That makes his chances of delivering  basically nil.  It is not as though after the recent demonstrations some bright bulbs from MIT or Cal-Tech have jumped up and endorsed him.

PCB

Quote from: MarkE on July 21, 2014, 11:56:47 PM
Based on history you are going out on quite a long limb.  It would be wonderful if Mills could deliver.  The problem is that his science is really, really bad. That makes his chances of delivering  basically nil.  It is not as though after the recent demonstrations some bright bulbs from MIT or Cal-Tech have jumped up and endorsed him.
Mark I've followed these guys for a very long time. I disagree that the science is bad. I've looked over it in much detail, as have some of my colleagues. His model has very good predictive qualities for chemistry, material science, etc.  Also read this investor comment (most recent)  http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/07/11/blacklight-powers-randell-mills-interview-product-deployment-very-quickly/ Like I said before best to wait and see. I'm keeping my figures crossed that the video of today's demo is going to be a little more impressive than those presented so far. I'm thinking it will be based on the snippet video I post earlier. I for one appreciate seeing the steps they are going through to make a workable system. This is rapid prototyping in it purest form, and obviously not a real product. He has had many dead ends, but now Mills is all fired up and ready to go!

MarkE

Quote from: PCB on July 22, 2014, 12:07:42 AM
Mark I've followed these guys for a very long time. I disagree that the science is bad. I've looked over it in much detail, as have some of my colleagues. His model has very good predictive qualities for chemistry, material science, etc.  Also read this investor comment (most recent)  http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/07/11/blacklight-powers-randell-mills-interview-product-deployment-very-quickly/ Like I said before best to wait and see. I'm keeping my figures crossed that the video of today's demo is going to be a little more impressive than those presented so far. I'm thinking it will be based on the snippet video one I post earlier. I for one appreciate seeing the steps they are going through to make a workable system. He has had many dead ends, but now Mills is all fired up and ready to go!
I do not wish to derail this thread into a debate about Mills and BLP.  Given the amount of time that has passed one could easily argue that time has told the tale.  In the final analysis, Mills will either finally deliver, or the game will just continue to go on as it has.  If you want to discuss this more at greater length, then please wake up one of the BLP threads.