Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[TinselKoala]

@Tinselkoala,


I noticed with your resonant transverter, output was reflected by input. Gotoluc's magnet core inductor generates it's own current that's not reflected by rise in input.


I noticed the same effect. The noise that is emitted by my QEG when in resonance is like a 5 track Home Theatre surround sound effect. The deep humming very powerful.

The magnet is excited by the bifilar primary magnetic field  activity and responds with it's own power generating oscillation that has no return influence on the primary draw.

Then neither you nor Gotoluc will have any difficulty showing a self-running device. Please post the video link as soon as you have it running itself on its own power generating oscillation.

You are misrepresenting your device when you call it a "QEG". It is neither a self-resonating oscillator nor can it function as a power supply for external circuits. But we know how you like to misrepresent stuff.

[TinselKoala]

@TinselKoala
"Is this result equal to the "Math rms" value on the scope screen? Which value is correct for the power represented by the scope V and I traces?"
Answerd 1: NO
Answerd 2: 0
The red scope display is the instantaneous power value, but it does not take it as a power but take it as voltage, so it display "instantaneous power value"max/sqrt(2) : the max on the red curve is when the V and I curve cross, and they croos at 2.5 divisions in Y, so max red curve value is 
2.5*100(V/div) * 2.5*0.32(I/div)=82.5 
and the MATH RMS displayed is 82.5/1.414=58...
But this is not the power it PowerVA/sqrt(2), it's nothing...
True power is AVG (on one cycle)/T=0  in W
@+

Exactly.

I wanted Synchro to answer those questions for himself, though, since he posted the scopeshot in the first place as evidence of... what I'm not sure, but there is NO real power shown on that scopeshot and the "MATH rms" value is meaningless.

[tinman]

@tinman: I've got several vids dealing with the issue of AC  and DC coupling. Here's one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVFyaQY6pR0
I'm a little annoyed in that video because I've been trying to explain these issues to LTseung for some time, since he is one of the culprits who have shown power measurements from AC-coupled channels, removing the DC contribution to the power he is trying to measure.

Thanks for all the info TK,i will go have a look at your video.

[synchro1]

Then neither you nor Gotoluc will have any difficulty showing a self-running device. Please post the video link as soon as you have it running itself on its own power generating oscillation.

You are misrepresenting your device when you call it a "QEG". It is neither a self-resonating oscillator nor can it function as a power supply for external circuits. But we know how you like to misrepresent stuff.

I ran pulse current through the primary bifilar from a Vellamen PWM I built from kit form, and recovered output from my magnet core bifilar toroid. I designed this kind  of device in theory on the "Solid State Synchro Coil" thread. I've been experimenting with magnet coil output recievers for over a decade.


Just because I have a photo voltaic panel that generates power dosn't mean I have to cover my roof with them to show it works. Gotoluc demonstrates the effect sufficiently, without pioneering a Power Company!

[Farmhand]

Please Synchro do some research, here's a good link below. Ignore the "beginners" label to the page the info is very good.

http://sound.westhost.com/xfmr.htm

Snippet

4.   Interesting Things About Transformers

As discussed above, the impedance ratio is the square of the turns ratio, but this is only one of many interesting things about transformers ... (well, I happen to think they are interesting, anyway ).

For example, one would think that increasing the number of turns would increase the flux density, since there are more turns contributing to the magnetic field. In fact, the opposite is true, and for the same input voltage, an increase in the number of turns will decrease the flux density and vice versa. This is counter-intuitive until you realise that an increase in the number of turns increases the inductance, and therefore reduces the current through each coil.

I have already mentioned that the power factor (and phase shift) varies according to load, and this (although mildly interesting) is not of any real consequence to most of us.

A very interesting phenomenon exists when we draw current from the secondary. Since the primary current increases to supply the load, we would expect that the magnetic flux in the core would also increase (more amps, same number of turns, more flux). In fact, the flux density decreases! In a perfect transformer with no copper loss, the flux would remain the same - the extra current supplies the secondary only. In a real transformer, as the current is increased, the losses increase proportionally, and there is slightly less flux at full power than at no load.

..