Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[Void]

...

P.S. I got the non inductive resistors from DIGIKEY and I was wondering some things.

1) Is it Ok to take measurements with my grounded scope if the device is "Isolated", as in running from a battery and not
connected to the ground ?

2) Is there still a chance of "ground loops" at these frequencies even with an isolated scope, due to displacement ?

What would be best practice with respect to isolation for taking scope measurements on this device considering the device
doesn't need to be ground connected ?

I'm also testing extra coils in series with the "Main Tanks" to increase the voltage for fluro's, I used 200 turns of 0.5 mm wire
on an "outer joiner" for 90mm PVC, no real need to tank that coil it works a treat, now I can get over 600 mA at 12.4 volts
input while lighting a 300 mm fluro tube form one side with the extra coil and the fluro is now brighter and looks like it could
get a bit brighter yet still. So I'm making progress on the potential required at this frequency to get the fluro "properly lit up",

Still have an issue, I can't easily produce reasonable video, new phone video is very dark under lights. My old Video camera
won't export to my laptop without a small firewire connection, I've got a USB to firewire but that doesn't work for the video
camera, looks like I need a new digital video camera that uses a micro SD/SD card. grrrr. The old ways are becoming a pain.

..

Hi Farmhand.

1) Yes, it should be OK if the scope is earth grounded if using a battery, but if you are also using an earth
ground connection in your circuitry then you will still have to watch out for possible ground loops, depending
where you connect the scope probe ground connectors. Connecting earth ground at certain points in a circuit can also
alter the behavior of high voltage AC circuits as you no doubt are already aware, so that can potentially alter
measurement results as well.

2) Not sure, but connecting in a scope ground into a high voltage AC circuit even if you have the scope
isolated from ground can still act as a sort of ground to the circuit and potentially alter circuit behavior somewhat.
Depends on the exact circuit configuration and voltages and frequencies and connection point. Something to consider if you
are getting strange or unexpected measurement results.

If you isolate your scope from earth ground it might help in the case where you have an earth ground
also connected into the circuit being measured, but if you place the scope probe ground clip connectors
at the earth ground point when measuring you should still be OK. If you have more than one earth
ground connection in the circuit then you might have issues. The way you have been connecting
your scope probes when measuring across your load looked OK to me, based on the diagram you posted previously.
Always when making measurements we should be comparing results to what would seem to make
sense, and if we are getting measured results that don't seem to make sense then we need
to investigate and see if there could be something wrong with the way we are measuring, or something
else that we may be overlooking. 

All the best...

[PCB]

Some of you folks seem to be desperately looking for any little small thing to use in your religious crusade against
claims of potential overunity by evil heretics. Perhaps we should be preparing to burn them all at the stake? 
Long live the religious crusade! Keep holding on with deep blind faith that all claims of overunity are impossible
and are therefore automatically heresy. Keep hurling the insults and accusations of fraud and scams,
even if you have no solid evidence of such fraud, as it is all OK because our blind faith tells us that all such
claims are absolutely impossible and could never be true. Therefore, based on our deep blind faith,
we are perfectly justified in attacking all those who consider things which are not supported by our faith.
These evil unclean heretics must be attacked and completely annihilated lest horrible heretical thoughts
of overunity and free energy be allowed to spread, and cause others to potentially question the views of
reality as held by us prophets of the one and only true reality.  Burn them! Burn the heretics at the stake!
Glory to the only true reality! Death and destruction to all heretics!  We must not rest a moment until they are
completely wiped from our midst! 
Yadda yadda yadda....

Void your mind is quite obvious stuck in a void. There is a long history to all of this, you need to go back to and take a day or two to read this tread. I suggest starting at around page 65. Some of us here have impacted the public discussion about their claims. We brought to their attention the ignorant use of peak power upon which Jamie claims of OU were originally based. Upon being wholly embarrassed in Morocco, the QEGers adopted the nonsensical use of "RMS" power and very quickly jumped ship from sourcing power from the secondary, and instead lead a crowd funding effort based upon claims of OU reactive power in the primary circuit, which as any 1st year student knows is just the stored energy built up overtime in tank circuit from all that mechanically driven parametric activity. Jamie and the gang have exposed their ignorance of electrical engineering on numerous occasions over the past five or so months as this saga has unfolded. His latest endeavor is to use an antenna to harness power from the local broadcast radio or TV station, which is completely illegal by the way.


I think you might feel better if you signed up to be-do.com, where your appreciation will be much better received and where your explanations of electrical engineering terms might be less insulting to the general audience.  In fact I'm a member and I have a great time over there, although the one-a-day posting gets a bit boring, much like watching paint dry with all the activity and intellectual commentary and such.

[Void]

PCB, you are barking up the wrong tree mate. I am not the slightest bit interested in
the belief wars and holy crusades of the true believers here who are imagining that they
are on a Holy mission to save the world, and I mean all those who are on both sides of the belief wars. 
That was kind of the point of my comment.   

People are making all sorts of bad measurements and/or making incorrect assumptions
in these forums and in youtube videos all the time. it is nothing new at all.
I am only interested in facts. Does something work as claimed, or at least partially as
claimed, or not? If many people seem incapable of understanding constructive suggestions on how
to improve their measurements, or on correcting incorrect assumptions they have, then
that's par for the course. Nothing new. It is the way of this world. Better to relax and
take what is useful, and ignore what is not... Life is too short.

All the best...

[PCB]

PCB, you are barking up the wrong tree mate. I am not the slightest bit interested in
the belief wars and holy crusades of the true believers here who are imagining that they
are on a Holy mission to save the world, and I mean all those who are on both sides of the belief wars. 
That was kind of the point of my comment.   

People are making all sorts of bad measurements and/or making incorrect assumptions
in these forums and in youtube videos all the time. it is nothing new at all.
I am only interested in facts. Does something work as claimed, or at least partially as
claimed, or not? If many people seem incapable of understanding constructive suggestions on how
to improve their measurements, or on correcting incorrect assumptions they have, then
that's par for the course. Nothing new. It is the way of this world. Better to relax and
take what is useful, and ignore what is not... Life is too short.

All the best...

Well if that's your position then the answer is simple. No the QEG does not work as claimed. Neither has any deadline ever been met. And yes fraud is a valid way to describe what is transpiring with the solicitations for six figures of mula. What measurements that have been taken demonstrate that in the efficiency numbers, sub 30%.  This circuit simulation was able to match also identically the waveforms displayed by Jamie etal.

www.energiederzukunft.org/forum/5-allgem...-generator?start=198[/font][/size]

You have joined us at a time when we are really just treading water. TK, being so bored with the level of activity, took matters into is own hands and created the miraculous solid state miniQEG, which is the only device with the name QEG attached that has been shown through very detailed measurement to be OU. We know in our hearts that is is'nt but TK and the rest of us do not know why.  Farmhand, being similarly inspired has done his own exploration, but requires much propping up as he has difficulty with vector math. These are all facts which can be explored in the varied and sometimes detailed pages of this thread. Happy reading.!

PS. Jamie may have been mistaken at the beginning when he first measured the power levels of his device as he undoubtedly used peak-to-peak values (8 time more power than was really present), but he has long since crossed over to the darkside to maintain funding for this charade.

[ACG]

The area under the curve product power.  HA, top that