Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 86 Guests are viewing this topic.

joel321

Quote from: isim on September 26, 2014, 04:14:14 AM
@Joel
http://water.usgs.gov/edu/watercyclesummary.html
http://water.usgs.gov/edu/hyhowworks.html
http://www.nwrfc.noaa.gov/info/water_cycle/hydrology.cgi
For the math:
http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/12/how-much-dam-energy-can-we-get/
http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/11/pump-up-the-storage/

or search for ourselve with google and  word like: "electric dam math "
good reading

Yeah I can understand that, BUT, it still does not show the ratio between input VS output....where is the math regarding every human requirements of energy? You know you and me are batteries that require energy too....i understand that if the hoover dam was gone the math would still make sense....the equations to how many people it is helping is over the power it gives out on the turbines alone....but then you have to think about the FREE ENERGY than Nikola Tesla obtained...what made him soooooo different than the others? What type of energy what this....the hoover dam was not even important to him because he could have made one from any river source....that is simple...

So all the math is simplistically said as follows...the higher we stop the water, the higher the pressure at the bottom of the river is? With regarding the walls of the canyon. DUH!!! that is pretty simple. Is like a flood...as the water rises it has more FREEE energy...the object that holds it back can use that energy...but the energy that comes out is higher than the energy that is put in. The equal and opposite reaction is false...because if i'm going 60MPH and crash VS a tree...i'm pretty sure the reaction would be less aware. Take for example when someone scares you...the action of scaring you is intentional...your reaction is of fear....lol = not equal.

So the hoover dam energy cannot be less than it's output....since it's fueled by the GALAXY huge amount of energy....look at the sun!!! copare it to a camp fire? Where the sun (galaxy) is fuiling it....it's a domino effect...WHEN THE INPUT IS THE SAME AS THE OUTPUT (cancel out?)>>>no evolution!!! THE INPUT HAS TO BE LESS THAN THE OUTPUT=EVOLUTION!!! Period.

Looking at it from a different ANGLE, how much energy did you need to make love to a female when a new born was made....maybe 2-3 minutes? and you made a replica (sort to speak) of yourself that will live for 100 years (give or take). Do you see what just occurred there....let me exaggerate and say that you made love to a woman for 2 hours.....to make a child that will live for 100yrs? is not that little input and more output....and i'm not even considering an alpha male....where an alpha male can have sex with 10 females a months reproducing all over the place???? SIMPLE!!!

TinselKoala

Joel, if you don't want to talk about the TOPIC OF THIS THREAD, why don't you just start your own thread on whatever topic you desire? And then see how many people join you for your discussion.

Meanwhile, those who are interested in the history of the QEG might like to take a look at this:
http://www.greenenergyinvestors.com/index.php?showtopic=18939&page=1
Read all the way through, it's only 12 pages or so. Note that Kevin and his partner show up in the chats, and that they knew back in April, May and June that no QEG anywhere had ever self run or produced real OU output power.

joel321

QuoteJoel, if you don't want to talk about the TOPIC OF THIS THREAD, why don't you just start your own thread on whatever topic you desire? And then see how many people join you for your discussion.

WOW, your answer requires very little energy...sorry bro, is all EVOLUTION lol Did you feed you cats yet bro?

TinselKoala

Quote from: PCB on September 26, 2014, 04:18:21 PM
@MH It occurs to me that the guys in China must be paying consulting fees to FTW. These were pretty hefty if I recall.  Also is there a license fee?

Perhaps TK you should send the guys in China an email, you are very lucid on the whole technical set of issues. Also, because they are so far behind the work of TK and FarmHand, they have not even gotten as far as I can tell to trying to tap in to the reactive power in the primary, only to very quickly see it vanish as a real load is applied. These folks are really operating completely behind closed doors at the moment. I've got to believe a sense of panic has started to set in. There is still stone silence on the Hungary video.

My work is fully documented and repeatable by anyone who has the time and a few dollars worth of garage sale test equipment. If the Chinese people want my help they certainly are welcome to ask for it. I'm getting pretty bitter about this whole thing, though. How can you deal with people like Kevin Blundell who simply lie, and when they are called on it, just censor all dissent and start calling names, instead of addressing the issues?

Fact: HopeGirl (Naima Feagin) and her mother Naitcheval (Valerie) Robitai/Robitaille have been involved with the criminal OPPT organization, and this is the source of the Morocco connection.
Fact: James Robitaille never achieved self running, never achieved any REAL ou, just "OU in VARs" with the early prototype.
Fact: They repeatedly claimed to have a running device and have even said that other builds, like Morocco etc. are "working" or "running". But this is a lie, no QEG anywhere has ever "ran" at all. They have always been driven by a big motor drawing more power from the mains than the entire device puts out to a real load. Always. Not self running, not even running at all.

Operating as a _driven_ variable reluctance oscillator is not "running" or "working". To see what a WORKING QEG should be, simply look at the FAQs on the Be-Do Forum, which are also in the Plans on Page 34-35. A WORKING QEG can be disconnected from the mains and will run itself once it is run up to resonance. A WORKING QEG will produce 10 kW out for 1 kW in. There are NO working QEGs and there never have been, and there is absolutely no reason to believe that there ever will be one!

And Kevin Blundell knew all of this back in April, May, June....  didn't you Kevin? See the link I posted above, if you've forgotten your Skype conversations.

So what's the use of me emailing China? The very fact that they even started the project at all means that they are gullible fools who either haven't done their homework at all and totally believe the lies, or they are True Believers who don't even care that the original claims were false. In either case they aren't going to be receptive to what I can tell them. After all I've been telling everybody who will listen, the same things since July!

Oh... and whatever happened to the 400 Hz and the 1.3 MHz? No QEG for which I have seen data resonates at 400 Hz. And we know what happened to the 1.3 MHz, that was specified as necessary and justified and even calculated .... suddenly it became 7 MHz without any explanation at all.  Will Kevin Blundell's QEG resonate at 400 Hz and use a 1.3 MHz exciter system as originally specified?

TinselKoala

Quote from: joel321 on September 27, 2014, 02:11:29 AM
WOW, your answer requires very little energy...sorry bro, is all EVOLUTION lol Did you feed you cats yet bro?

You got one thing right: You are sorry.