Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[MileHigh]

Isim:

Thanks!  I glanced through it and it is just a mish-mash of mostly nonsense and poor hapless Kevin Blundell is taking notes.  The poor guy is trying to build a QEG and people are throwing cockamamie suggestions at him from all directions.  Why, I thought that all that you had to do was download the plans and build it and it will work!

There was a big discussion about whether they should be winding their coils "clockwise" vs. "counterclockwise" and they were collectively groping around in the dark and clutching at straws and bumping into walls.

So much for Naima's "fantastic team of engineers."

If there is anything that says "absolutely unknowing/clueless group of newbies" it's when a group of people agonize over whether they should wind their coils "clockwise" or "counter-clockwise."  From what I saw it looked like the discussion must have spanned several Skype sessions.

It's a sad sad state of affairs.  Kevin doesn't stand a chance because the QEG is nonsense.  Kevin doesn't stand a chance because the Skype chat group are a rag-tag collection of people that have no idea what they are doing.  So he doesn't stand a chance-squared.

From what I saw one of the worst offenders was "meta200."  Here is a sample:

[22/08/2014 03:48:45] mmeta200: Hole theory is the virtual, spatial potential
[22/08/2014 03:49:22] mmeta200: it goes from negative to postive...backward from
electrons....its the cold energy of the overunity machine

He is a dope!   (Medium to hard-core techies will get that joke!)

MileHigh

[Pirate88179]

So much for Naima's "fantastic team of engineers."



It's a sad sad state of affairs.  Kevin doesn't stand a chance because the QEG is nonsense.  Kevin doesn't stand a chance because the Skype chat group are a rag-tag collection of people that have no idea what they are doing.  So he doesn't stand a chance-squared.





MileHigh

Do I hear cubed?  Going once...going twice...

Bill

[TinselKoala]

Isim:

Thanks!  I glanced through it and it is just a mish-mash of mostly nonsense and poor hapless Kevin Blundell is taking notes.  The poor guy is trying to build a QEG and people are throwing cockamamie suggestions at him from all directions.  Why, I thought that all that you had to do was download the plans and build it and it will work!

There was a big discussion about whether they should be winding their coils "clockwise" vs. "counterclockwise" and they were collectively groping around in the dark and clutching at straws and bumping into walls.

So much for Naima's "fantastic team of engineers."

If there is anything that says "absolutely unknowing/clueless group of newbies" it's when a group of people agonize over whether they should wind their coils "clockwise" or "counter-clockwise."  From what I saw it looked like the discussion must have spanned several Skype sessions.

It's a sad sad state of affairs.  Kevin doesn't stand a chance because the QEG is nonsense.  Kevin doesn't stand a chance because the Skype chat group are a rag-tag collection of people that have no idea what they are doing.  So he doesn't stand a chance-squared.

From what I saw one of the worst offenders was "meta200."  Here is a sample:

He is a dope!   (Medium to hard-core techies will get that joke!)

MileHigh

Yes, that MMeta person is remarkably ... er... inventive.

But it certainly does make a difference whether a coil is wound one way or the other way. For a given current direction, the resulting magnetic field is opposite in CW vs CCW winds. This may or may not make a difference in practice on any given apparatus. It is the parameter that affects phasing in triggered oscillators for example. As far as the magnetic field goes, reversing the direction of winding is equivalent to reversing the direction of current in the coil, and if it is a matter of phasing an AC signal, reversing direction makes a 180 degree phase shift in the resulting induced response.

If you wound one of your coils the wrong way around, this can usually be fixed simply by reversing the hookup (the polarity) of the coil. But not always, since the coil windings in a multilayer coil will be at different distances from the core, and you might wind up with the "high voltage" end of the coil on the inner windings nearest the core, instead of the outermost windings where they should be for isolation and breakdown resistance.

In a device like the fullsize QEG, to make matters simpler, all the coils should probably be wound in the same sense. Does it matter which one? Probably not, as long as you try to get your high voltages on the outside windings instead of the inside ones. This can be arranged by connecting the coils in the proper "dot" polarity.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDabcAB0E_8

[MileHigh]

TK:

Yes, I am just implying that counter-clockwise or clockwise, all that they have to do is reverse the two connections to the coil.  In the context of their conversation, I somehow doubt that they were aware of this or were taking high-voltage issues into consideration.

For the high-voltage stuff, my thoughts are that winding the coil left-to-right for one layer, and then right-to-left for the layer on top of the first layer is the wrong way to go.  You could have loops with a very high potential difference between them quite close to each other.  My suggestion would be to wind the coil in "small chunks" left-to-right.   Like a 6-layer chunk, and then to the right of that there would be another 6-layer chink, and so on until you got to the right side of the coil.  That way the low-potential windings would be in the far-left chunk and the highest potential windings would be in the rightmost chunk.  So you would not have the problem of a large potential difference between two loops that were close to each other.

I of course have never done any of this but that seems to be the most logical approach to make sure that the coil avoids any inter-loop shorting.  I have never seen this discussed in the QEG realm but I don't follow the technical discussion, or what few crumbs there are of the technical discussion.

In my opinion if Jamie was "real" he would have made this procedure very public so that people would be aware.

I have never played with high voltage stuff, so whatever I say would have to be double-checked.  Anything I say about this stuff would have to be followed up by people doing their own due diligence because I am not qualified in this area.  I don't want someone to get zapped because of me.

I have a feeling my comments are all moot anyways.  It feels like Canada and South Africa are the last kids on the block and everybody else has thrown in the towel.

MileHigh

[Pirate88179]

TK:

Yes, I am just implying that counter-clockwise or clockwise, all that they have to do is reverse the two connections to the coil.  In the context of their conversation, I somehow doubt that they were aware of this or were taking high-voltage issues into consideration.

For the high-voltage stuff, my thoughts are that winding the coil left-to-right for one layer, and then right-to-left for the layer on top of the first layer is the wrong way to go.  You could have loops with a very high potential difference between them quite close to each other.  My suggestion would be to wind the coil in "small chunks" left-to-right.   Like a 6-layer chunk, and then to the right of that there would be another 6-layer chink, and so on until you got to the right side of the coil.  That way the low-potential windings would be in the far-left chunk and the highest potential windings would be in the rightmost chunk.  So you would not have the problem of a large potential difference between two loops that were close to each other.

I of course have never done any of this but that seems to be the most logical approach to make sure that the coil avoids any inter-loop shorting.  I have never seen this discussed in the QEG realm but I don't follow the technical discussion, or what few crumbs there are of the technical discussion.

In my opinion if Jamie was "real" he would have made this procedure very public so that people would be aware.

I have never played with high voltage stuff, so whatever I say would have to be double-checked.  Anything I say about this stuff would have to be followed up by people doing their own due diligence because I am not qualified in this area.  I don't want someone to get zapped because of me.

I have a feeling my comments are all moot anyways.  It feels like Canada and South Africa are the last kids on the block and everybody else has thrown in the towel.

MileHigh

MH:

Have you ever used and/or repaired a ShopVac?  If so, then obviously you are highly qualified for their "Scientific" discussion over there, ha ha.

Hey, what about those 5,000 Chinese "engineers"?  Have they given up yet?  Do they even exist?  Did they ever exist in the first place?

Bill