Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Groundloop

Quote from: MarkE on December 08, 2014, 03:24:59 PM
Let me rephrase your question then:  "Given two tank circuits, one using larger toriods than the other, which circuit stores more energy?"  The answer is:  "There is not enough information supplied to answer the question."  A bigger form can store more energy before it saturates than a smaller toroid.  As you change the dimensions of the toroid the inductance per turn changes as does the resistance per turn.  The ratio of the inductive reactance to the resistance at the resonant frequency determines hat fraction of stored energy is lost each cycle, IE it determines the Q factor.  The inductance and the peak current determine the peak stored energy.

Mark,

It IS a very simple question, there is just one coil with a ferrite core and one capacitor in parallel with the coil.

First we connect an oscillator to the L/C tank circuit and store some energy into the tank circuit, then
we disconnect the oscillator. At the same time we increase the Ferrite core to double size and connect
the tank circuit to a load to measure the output. Will the output be higher or lower than the energy inputted
into the tank circuit when we increase the size of the ferrite core?

I do not think I can explain it simpler than this.

GL.

Groundloop

Quote from: MileHigh on December 08, 2014, 03:37:54 PM
Groundloop:

I usually find simple examples like that fun.  There is a limitation or perhaps we can call it a flaw in the logic of your example.  However, I would prefer to discuss that later.

Permit me to give you a very simple and related example.  Just like in your example, we will assume everything is based on idealized components (zero wire resistance, etc.)  I think my example will give you some insight into your example.

You have two coils in series, Coil A and Coil B.  The "left side" of Coil A connects to the "right side" of Coil B to form a  circuit.  In other words, the current flows through Coil A, then through Coil B, and then back to Coil A.  There is no magnetic coupling at all between Coil A and Coil B.

When you start the experiment there is a zero-ohm jumper across Coil B, effectively taking it out of the circuit.  There is no current flowing through Coil B at the start of the experiment.

To start the experiment, by "magic" you have one ampere of current flowing through the circuit.   So that means there is one amp flowing through Coil A, and Coil B is being bypassed because of the zero-ohm jumper.

Now since this is an idealized example, if you do not disturb the circuit, current will flow through Coil A forever.

So the question is, what happens when you remove the shorting jumper across Coil B so that it becomes part of the circuit?

(MarkE and other regulars who know please don't answer.)

MileHigh

Mile,

I have a question for you, what happen to the stored energy in a not connected L/C tank circuit if you double
the core size after you have charged the tank circuit?

GL.

Groundloop

Quote from: dvy1214 on December 08, 2014, 03:31:38 PM
Might be wrong but studying magneto restrictive materials along with basic understanding of why magnetism manifests IE organization of domains(which costs energy) plus the realization that what you are asking is actually impossible(" Let us assume we add that core material very fast and at no energy usage to do so") might help you come to a conclusion.

>>that what you are asking is actually impossible

This is only a thought experiment and it is not impossible to increase you core size in a thought experiment.

GL.

dvy1214

Ok then sure its possible if things could manifest out of the abstract into concrete reality unimpinged upon by the laws of physics. Thats a really useful thought experiment.

MileHigh

Quote from: Groundloop on December 08, 2014, 03:43:42 PM
Mile,

I have a question for you, what happen to the stored energy in a not connected L/C tank circuit if you double
the core size after you have charged the tank circuit?

GL.

I will give you a simple answer.  I will assume that the core is not saturated in all cases.  I will assume that the dimensions of the coil do not change.  The permeability of the core affects the inductance of the coil as "seen" by the coil.   If you add more core material, then the permeability of the core will not really change, as "seen" by the coil.

So the simple answer is nothing changes.

If you think of the core as a "tank" to sore energy then think if this:   You have a 5-liter tank that is filled with two liters of water.  Now you change to a 10-liter tank, but it still is filled with two liters of water.   Nothing has really changed.

The water represents the stored energy in the (coil + core) combination.

MileHigh