Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[Pirate88179]

Buffffooooooon

I take this as your admission that you do not know what this topic is about.

Thank you,

Bill

[joel321]

Hey pirate88179 arr arr!

You seem like a smart person and can probably crunch some Einstein numbers, but, in all honesty, I'm tired of the ALPHA males taking advantage of the buffoon scientists.

Time and time again I see this mentality!

A scientists inventor shows the world that engines can be run by water. It gets shut down as a fraud when no oil is involved. Now the USA navy will implement that technology recently and will run their ships and air planes from water in the up coming future. So hat basically says that engines can be run by water....i won't provide a link but google is your friend.....100% facts.

Then I hear about so many other things that have little input with greater output!  Then I'm just in this topic about a QEG, being judged as a fraud like all of the rest will be and you will feel like a superman that you have done your deed! You are just here trying to prevent people from supporting the frauds! Thank you!

But then when I look at my crystal ball based on the judgment from the past and judging how the universe works with our monkey brains, we can gather that QEGs do work.

ok...lets say 100% with out a doubt that even if 2000 scientists tackled this QEG, it will never work. Can you 100% say why it will never work or are you judging this QEG by your personal experiences?

What is your definition of overunity?

[Pirate88179]

Hey pirate88179 arr arr!

You seem like a smart person and can probably crunch some Einstein numbers, but, in all honesty, I'm tired of the ALPHA males taking advantage of the buffoon scientists.

Time and time again I see this mentality!

A scientists inventor shows the world that engines can be run by water. It gets shut down as a fraud when no oil is involved. Now the USA navy will implement that technology recently and will run their ships and air planes from water in the up coming future. So hat basically says that engines can be run by water....i won't provide a link but google is your friend.....100% facts.

Then I hear about so many other things that have little input with greater output!  Then I'm just in this topic about a QEG, being judged as a fraud like all of the rest will be and you will feel like a superman that you have done your deed! You are just here trying to prevent people from supporting the frauds! Thank you!

But then when I look at my crystal ball based on the judgment from the past and judging how the universe works with our monkey brains, we can gather that QEGs do work.

ok...lets say 100% with out a doubt that even if 2000 scientists tackled this QEG, it will never work. Can you 100% say why it will never work or are you judging this QEG by your personal experiences?

What is your definition of overunity?

More output than input.  It would be a 2nd law violation.  Not to say that I do not believe in free energy, I do.  I light my apt. utilizing free energy.  But, I know where the energy comes from and it has less output than in...but still free. Like your Hoover dam example, or solar, or wind...free energy but not overunity.

Does this makes sense?

Trust me, I am all about obtaining all of the free energy I can get.  Overunity is really not a very good term in my opinion. Maybe free energy isn't either...rather, free to me energy might be better.  This should not include stealing energy, that would be different.  I am talking about solar, wind, JT circuits, Water wheels, etc.  It is very hard to nail down some definitions of overunity here on this site.  I have tried and it usually ends in arguments.

So, I stick with free energy or, free to me energy.

Bill

[joel321]

More output than input.  It would be a 2nd law violation.  Not to say that I do not believe in free energy, I do.  I light my apt. utilizing free energy.  But, I know where the energy comes from and it has less output than in...but still free. Like your Hoover dam example, or solar, or wind...free energy but not overunity.

OK, thanks. Do you know if the person whom stated the second law a GOD? As if, since it was stated it can't never be "broken"?

I know where the energy comes from and it has less output than in

How do you know that? From where does the ENERGY come from?

Trust me, I am all about obtaining all of the free energy I can get.  Overunity is really not a very good term in my opinion. Maybe free energy isn't either...rather, free to me energy might be better.  This should not include stealing energy, that would be different.  I am talking about solar, wind, JT circuits, Water wheels, etc.  It is very hard to nail down some definitions of overunity here on this site.  I have tried and it usually ends in arguments.

So, I stick with free energy or, free to me energy.

YES!!! please be on the FREEE side of things. Actually when I refer to FREEE, I'm mostly speaking about the mind. The ENERGY rather than the work. We all have to work to gather the FREEE energy...where the lazy get forgotten behind!

Can you see the ladder? Where all of the steps are mistakes that the future learn from?

The FREEE pass has less resistance in the electronics. This whole world is balanced and has little input to give greater output.....well this is a tricky part....

What is little input?

What is great output?

Do you know their purpose? 

[Pirate88179]

OK, thanks. Do you know if the person whom stated the second law a GOD? As if, since it was stated it can't never be "broken"?

No, not God.  A law begins as a theory that is tested experimentally by many scientists over a period of time.  If there are no deviations observed then the theory becomes a law.  The 2nd law of thermodynamics has been around for a long, long time now and, has never been violated.  Thus far, this proves that the theory, and the law, are correct.

Should there ever be any proven and replicable violations of this law, then I would suppose that the law would no longer stand, and a new theory/law would be adopted.

It is not like someone just wakes up one day and says, "Henceforth, for every action, there will be an equal and opposite reaction."  It is all about scientific experiments, and the history and record of these experiments that takes an idea from a theory to a law.

Can the 2nd law of thermodynamics be broken?  One can assume that it is a possibility, no matter how remote.  It is just that, to date, it has never been violated.  The odds are that it never will be.  But, who knows?

Bill