3v OU Flashlight

[hartiberlin]

TK and all,
good replications,
but now we know TK is using a MnZi material ferrite core and can not get OU with it
but  Lasersaber is using NiZn ferrite core and gets extreme run times on a charged capacitor
and pretty high load LED bulb.

So it probably also depends all on the material of the used ferrite cores.

So better try to get NiZn cores for your ferrite material.

Regards, Stefan,

[JohnnBlade]

@Lost Bro,

Thnx man, it worked!

Easier then boiling an egg, i placed a pan with cold/warm water on fire and boiled the whole flyback just like that, i took nothing off. All took about 10 min to cook, and the core came right of without any effort.

Since i was busy i did another core, but not knowing that when i placed the 2e core into the boiling water it cracked into 4 pieces   so it was a good lesson not to dump a core into boiling water

Good shit Lost Bro!

Now lets try some Akula stuff ; )

Greets JB

[avalon]

Matthew Chapter 7, verses 3-5.

I liked that. Very clever.

~A

[d3x0r]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dq9NQhzdw0 lasersaber has something like success

[dewetw]

Lets forget about miss quoted wood in the eyes. To make progress in science you need to take theory to fact, you need theoretical scientists to work with practical scientists. We have that here. I am both but don't always have time to get to the practical. Understandable there is a lot of opinionated people on the net that confuses the identification of legitimate theorist. Keep in mind it is called the THEORY of relativity (Einstein). Most of what Tesla did was theory based. In his patent you would often see (no model) printed at the top. Theory is taking aim, putting it to practice is shooting. Would you really want to just shoot wildly into the air hoping to hit something?

A core is a core is a core, as long as it looks the same right? Just like a to220 silicon device is a to220 silicon device is a to220 silicon device right? And if something looks the same and it is the same part from the same manufacturer it must be the same, right? Note the comment lasersaber makes about why his one transformer works and the other does not. Now think about the multiple OU devices that worked but could not be recreated, not even by the inventor themselves. Could it be that not all logic works by accurately copying the original because of oblivious differences?

Can the properties of core material change? According to Epcos the N22 material can be permanently changed/damaged if subjected to a magnetic field of too much intensity. Can other things change/damage it? Excessive heat (400C +) would. We can use this our advantage to anneal and permanently rotate and fix the electron spin.

Nickel makes for an interesting read on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel
It was first defined in Germany (guess what country is next door?). It, along with iron is believed to be what the majority of the core of the earth consists of - we know that the earth has a permanent magnetic field, this only happens with aligned electron spin. The stuff in the earth is heated. The earth spins on its axis. Is it a coincident that the north and south pole is perpendicular to the rotation of the earth? An earth that has nickel as part of its core? Nickel that is heated and in doing so allowed to align its electron spin with that of the torque vector of the spinning mass that is the earth? Electrons that aligning because they have mass and thus torque spin of their own? Torque that aligns to torque? Torque that creates a magnetic field perpendicular to it? Does this mean that if we are able to control the direction of spin, we also control the torque spin and thus control the magnetic field? If we can control the magnetic field, does this mean we can make it fluctuate? What if we place an electrical conductor like a copper wire coil round this fluctuating magnetic field?

Could all this be just coincidental?

More about nickel. Nickel is one of only 4 known ferromagnetic elements at room temperature. Iron(Fe), cobalt(Co) and gadolinium(Gd) being the other 3. Note: manganese(Mn) is not one of them. Why have a core based on manganese (MnZn) then and expect it to interact with an magnetic field in the same way as nickel based (NiZn) one? The QEG is based on a specific steel alloy (M19 C5, aka electrical steel) core, an alloy containing both iron(Fe). If you do not use the correct core material in the QEG it does not work. If the QEG does not go into resonance, it does not produce extra energy out. The QEG "builds up and goes into resonance". NAR? NMR? Both maybe?

I believe that what we are trying to achieve and what is being done by the QEG is the same - this is great news.

Also think about this: the bedini device only produces OU sometimes. It has been reported that the weaker ferrous magnets produce better results than neodymium magnets. Could it be because the neodymium is not one of the 4 ferro elements? - I'll investigate this further. Here too we see aligned electron spin and controlled magnetic fields.

What Akula is doing, what bedini is doing and what is claimed in the QEG just have too many coincidences to ignore. Lets use this to our advantage: find the commonalities, derive theories, test and eliminate to move forward. There is a some more interesting things to note about nickel I will communicate at a later stage.

The capetonian