New Flywheel MoGen Appears To Be A Self Runner!

[mscoffman]

It turns out that we will know the answer to this on or about June 1, 2014. Unlike what Tinsel Kolola seems to indicate
there is an actual scientific question that underlies many qmogen replications. That question is whether a mass in motion has intertia
that inherently causes motion or (vs) whether mass inertia function does work on the mass that is in motion. Scientists picked (a)
a long time ago, but without good experimental justification, but we have a person who says he has a counter example
that the answer to this question is actually (b) and that he can prove it definatively. In (b) overunity energy exists.

If...we can avoid standard OU blow-ups we will see on Jun 1. If we can't then most likely current scientific scenario
is correct - implying that lots of people get their jollies building self operating motor generators on youtube then they
bogusly claim OU.

[TinselKoala]

That might be a question, but it isn't scientific. "Science" already  knows the answer to that one. If you doubt me, please study the history of the Cassini mission to Saturn. "Science" understands gravity, inertia, and how things move and all the rest of that stuff pretty darn well, and there isn't any room for self-running QMoGens, and you can bet your bippy that if there was, some of those commercial companies who make motor-generator sets for load levelling and frequency conversion would have known about it long ago. You can even bet your grandma's bippy that, "on or about June 1" there will be no self-running QMoGen displayed.... but you will be told that it will be done.... soon.

[MarkE]

It turns out that we will know the answer to this on or about June 1, 2014. Unlike what Tinsel Kolola seems to indicate
there is an actual scientific question that underlies many qmogen replications. That question is whether a mass in motion has intertia
that inherently causes motion or (vs) whether mass inertia function does work on the mass that is in motion. Scientists picked (a)
a long time ago, but without good experimental justification, but we have a person who says he has a counter example
that the answer to this question is actually (b) and that he can prove it definatively. In (b) overunity energy exists.

If...we can avoid standard OU blow-ups we will see on Jun 1. If we can't then most likely current scientific scenario
is correct - implying that lots of people get their jollies building self operating motor generators on youtube then they
bogusly claim OU.

Mass has inertia period.  Inertia means that it requires force to change the velocity of a mass whether or not that mass starts out moving relative to some frame of reference or not.  The inertial property of masses has been shown without fail billions of times.  You are welcome to try to point to any experiment that you feel has ever shown that as you put it:  "mass inertia function does work on the mass that is in motion".  For any accepted usage of the term 'work', I am confident that you cannot find such an experiment.