How Steorn Works

[PaulLowrance]

Does anyone know exactly what Steorn's claims are?  Is their machine self-running (closing the loop, recirculating enough energy to run by itself without draining a battery source)?

Paul Lowrance

[Ekfugo]

If STEORN, or anybody else for that matter, (say Lutec or Perendev for example), turn out to be a sham - or a money scam - it WILL NOT deter me, nor my associates.

Of course, it just makes it harder on ALL of us when try to put out a legitamate device in the future.

~ Ek

[dean_mcgowan]

Come on.. lets stop pandering to these dupe artists, if it really works and the technology is easy to reporduce, who the hell is gonna pay top dollar for it, it will be like napster, the controlling interest will try and close down one company and by the time they do 5 more will be selling the product ad infinitum. Just look at the illegal CD markets across the world or file sharing technology. You cannot patent and control this kind of invention, you are never gonna make a dollar out of such an invention. So i give a big poo poo to all those that think it may evolve any other way.

Unless you could throw a field across the earth that disables all such devices except for a very specific set of resonances that you are the only person can tap. Encoded free energy anyone???  Maybe that is what these turkeys are hoping for. Set up an energy shield and then modulate it with only those with the ability to know where the current accessible frequencys can tap free energy. Then sell the digital set top box to know the access frequency or no energy for you people ... hahahahahahaha .. yah hahahahaha .. evil empire laugh .. etc etc

[dean_mcgowan]

Or maybe this is a function of HAARP and woodpecker already .. yah haaaaa  haaaa gurgle gurgle gurgle .. rrrrrrrr .. evil empire gleeeful cackle ....

[energyman8]

As for people "hearing" that Steorn was on CNN I say give me some proof. As to the other media attention they got, thats because they have a great marketing department and they have the balls to stand behind their claims.  Why not slap them across the face and see how they react?

Calling out to the scientific community to come and check your device is the most admiral approach I have seen yet and I applaud them, as some of you already know.

As for them going on Larry King I highly doubt it and you are only ASSUMING without factual evidence to support your claim just as much as they are. They have already stated the "interview" stage is over for now.

Peace out.