The Bessler Wheel, mystery solved.

[TinselKoala]

This is just another thread with a claimant who plays games with you and who will _never_ show you any of his own real work that supports his claims.

June 1 will come and go and we will still have nothing but BS from this claimant.

Remember Archer Quinn? Mylow? Elecar? A dozen others who have done the same thing? QEG? Claims without evidence, threads that pretend to "teach" by someone who can't even understand the basics of their own chosen topic?

[gurangax]

The thing is so simple to understand, why would the inventor not understand his creation?


regards

[gauschor]

Only 10 days left! Let's start a 10-day-lasting-beach-party (never)ending in the climax of energy liberation

[Vortex1]

Dear Gurangax,

The wheel thickness is described as variously 6 inches, 14 inches and 12 inches for wheel diameters of 10 feet, 12 feet and 11 feet respectively.

If we consider the maximum and minimums, it does not leave a lot of room for a hinged weight swinging in the Z axis. In other words it would not produce a lot of gain if the best case swinging weight was a 28" movement from the outer edge inward. This is a best case of 12" for the 6" thick wheel.

Was there some other means employed than weights swinging in the Z axis? In other words, was the Z axis employed for some other purpose?

Kind Regards, Vortex1

P.S  the naysayers will always be there, but you have gotten me to ponder gravity and how it produces an acceleration of a body of mass, that in itself is valuable, so I thank you. I also enjoy the clues and revisiting the wheel.

[gurangax]

Dear Gurangax,

The wheel thickness is described as variously 6 inches, 14 inches and 12 inches for wheel diameters of 10 feet, 12 feet and 11 feet respectively.

If we consider the maximum and minimums, it does not leave a lot of room for a hinged weight swinging in the Z axis. In other words it would not produce a lot of gain if the best case swinging weight was a 28" movement from the outer edge inward. This is a best case of 12" for the 6" thick wheel.

Was there some other means employed than weights swinging in the Z axis? In other words, was the Z axis employed for some other purpose?

Kind Regards, Vortex1

P.S  the naysayers will always be there, but you have gotten me to ponder gravity and how it produces an acceleration of a body of mass, that in itself is valuable, so I thank you. I also enjoy the clues and revisiting the wheel.

Of course if I want it to be really powerfull I will need a thicker z axis but, I dont think Bessler wanted to demonstrate a powerfull wheel, it is enough just to show some excess energy do some work which seems to be perpetual but actually it is driven by gravity. Also I must stress that to replace the thickness on z axis one can substitute the thickness with heavier mass.


regards