The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[gravityblock]

MileHigh,

It blows my mind how you can dismiss all of the evidence contained in every one of those video links, which probably has 6+ hours of total video, within a 53 minute time period after the posting of those links.  This tells me you will dismiss any and all evidence that is in opposition to your own views and agenda and wrongfully claim the evidence isn't credible based on your own false beliefs and perceptions.

Gravock 

[MileHigh]

Gravityblock:

Do you think the moon is real, or do you think it is a holographic PacMan moon?

MileHigh

[Pirate88179]

Gravityblock:

Do you think the moon is real, or do you think it is a holographic PacMan moon?

MileHigh

GB will most likely disagree with this but I believe it is real since we landed on it a number of times during the Apollo missions.  It really scares me to find that a number of young folks think we never landed on the moon.  They claim that we did not have the technology to do so at the time.  They should be very impressed that we were able to do so using the then present technology.  A lot of money and a lot of very hard work from many engineers and scientists allowed this to happen.  I have talked to some of them.  We owe a great dept to their accomplishments and they deserve better than for folks to "claim" that we did not do it or the moon does not really exist. (Holy crap!)

Bill

PS:  If GB thinks the moon is a hologram then, how does he explain the tides?

[gravityblock]

Gravityblock:

It still blows my mind sometimes how such completely retarded things can be posted on YouTube.  There has to be a "crazy" person behind a retarded clip.  Then people will actually believe the retarded YouTube clips and take them seriously.

I looked at the self-described "tinfoil hat" clip that you linked to in your posting called, "Holographic Moon, Matrix Flaw? The Pac Man Shadow Moon 1-9-2013."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOMCN2K2fhM

Look at the screen capture, they messed up the holographic projection of the moon from the secret HAARP II holographic projection bases in the Indian ocean.

But......  If you have brains and want to do the slightest amount of due diligence, sometimes there are comments on the clip itself that are worth reading.

Like this one, "You don't say what equipment you are using. It looks to me like a very common effect of taking a picture through an eyepiece of a telescope with a camera, and being slightly off-centre, you pick up the edge of the botttom end of the eyepiece. The exit pupil is only so wide, and you have to be over the centre to not get the black line effect. it happens when you view through it as well, but it's easier to do than photographing. You wouldn't get that effect if you attached your camera directly to the telescope and took out the eyepiece. I know some of you want to believe this hologram thing, but every single one of these types of videos and photographs are just so obvious to anyone with any experience in astronomy, and especially astrophotography. Sorry."

I am flabbergasted that a guy that can talk such high-end pseudoscience about quantum theory would be bamboozled into believing that the moon is a holographic projection because some dumb dude went camping in the Arizona mountains and stuck his digital camera up to the eyepiece of his telescope and snapped a picture of the moon missing a big chunk of Limburger cheese.

MileHigh

How are we are able to see the entire outline and the entire circumference of the moon looking through a portion of the eyepiece?  We wouldn't see the shadow portions on the moon if looking through a portion of the eyepiece, but instead the shadow portions would be completely darkened and not reveal the entire circumference of the moon.  Where is the big chunk of missing Limburger cheese you speak of in the snapshot you posted?  Another sad analysis and viewer comment!

Gravock

[gravityblock]

GB will most likely disagree with this but I believe it is real since we landed on it a number of times during the Apollo missions.  It really scares me to find that a number of young folks think we never landed on the moon.  They claim that we did not have the technology to do so at the time.  They should be very impressed that we were able to do so using the then present technology.  A lot of money and a lot of very hard work from many engineers and scientists allowed this to happen.  I have talked to some of them.  We owe a great dept to their accomplishments and they deserve better than for folks to "claim" that we did not do it or the moon does not really exist. (Holy crap!)

Bill

PS:  If GB thinks the moon is a hologram then, how does he explain the tides?

A funny thing happened on the way to the moon!

The pressure of light explains the forces and the tides within our holographic universe.  In your terms, the sunlight reflected from the moon exerts a pressure on the liquid mass of the ocean.  Being compressed at one point, this liquid is raised up at another.  This is the explanation of the retardation of tides caused by the moon.  In my terms, neither matter nor energy exist within this simulation, but only deformed space, which is called matter, and what you call energy is nothing more than a phenomenon of transition between primordial space and deformed space.  Since light is deformed space turning itself back into primordial space, then the meeting of these two conditions of space causes quite a marked pressure on us as we move past this stationary light via our expansion acceleration within this simulation.  Since matter and energy doesn't exist within this simulation and is an illusion, then the moon can not be made up of matter and it is also an illusion or a hologram.

Gravock