The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[gravityblock]

LOL.   Somewhere your "mathematical rebuttals" were devoid of any math, or any actual data that supported your assertions.  We all know that you are playing a game for LULZ.  Do you think you are doing well?

I showed mathematically how those numbers were not dimensionless as TK wrongly asserted, and I also provided actual data and mathematics to where those numbers came from in order to back up my statements.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Just pointing out that you have avoided answering my question but of course you will demand that I answer yours, then perhaps lie a little or pretend that you have. 

I did not deliberately avoid answering your question, but instead took your advice to get your thesis in words before we began, as I previously did in the car race.  If you want to play the stupid card and say I didn't provide enough information for the race, then so be it.  However, I think most readers would disagree with you on this point.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Do you disagree with Mathis's statement of, "we can draw eight steps or 64 steps or an infinity of steps, and it will not change a thing?  If you disagree with his statement, then please show how the perimeter changes after each step.  Your method for finding the length of the arc is not applicable for a circular path with a time variable.

Gravock

Yes.  In the specific sense that it is meaningful to the problem at hand - which is measuring the arc.  You could apply the identical principle to the hypotenuse and end up with a contradiction to the pythagorean theorem.  However since we know the pythagorean theorem to be true by other means we know that this can not be a correct measure.  QED.

This is not what I asked you.  I asked you, "If you disagree with his statement, then please show how the perimeter changes after each step."  You once again try to take a circular path with a time element and turn it into a circle or an identical principle with no time element.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Define "dimensionless constant" using only the lemmas of ZF(C).

In the context of geometry, pi is assumed to be a dimensionless constant.  Pi transforms one length to another.  This is clear from the basic equation: C = 2πr.  You can see that pi takes us from one length to another and therefore is dimensionless.  Do you think pi is dimensionless in geometry? Do you think pi is dimensionless in the real world?  Do you think the circumference is only a length and/or only a distance in both geometry and in the real world?

Gravock

[MarkE]

I showed mathematically how those numbers were not dimensionless as TK wrongly asserted, and I also provided actual data and mathematics to where those numbers came from in order to back up my statements.

Gravock

LOL.  Now in attempting to defend your silly assertions with respect to your empty assertions directed at me, you're referencing your empty assertions made some time ago to TK.