The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[Qwert]

Do you believe his assertion that objects follow paths that consist of a series of perfect 90 degree deflections?  Do you believe his claim that such deflections are even possible without unlimited power?

Probably in Creationist's way it's possible. You know, those people don't need to prove anything, they just believe; very hard believe. Thus, gravityblock goes far too far since he even attempts to argue.
Don't forget, Creationists believe the Universe was created within literally 7 (seven) days and that happened somewhat ten thousand years ago. It must be true because The Bible say so.

[gravityblock]

A fact I'm well aware but you talked about the posters hometown.  Clearly you must also be insulting a town. 

Another misdirection by you.  It was Pirate Bill of Kentucky who spoke badly about his home town and not me.  I only questioned why he would be very proud of his home town's failed liberal policies and going down hill fast.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

LOL, let's see you demonstrate one of these instant 90 degree motions that you insist are the basis of all real trajectories.  Let's see you show the 90 degree movements that you claim are "correct movement of matter through space" for a collimated beam of light such as a LASER.

You have inverted the truth.  Light is stationary, and we are moving past stationary light in our surrounding space at 9.8m/s² via our expansion acceleration.  This is what we call gravity!

Gravock

[TinselKoala]

It's patently absurd for someone to claim that "calculus is wrong" and that "pi = 4" when he's sitting there typing on a computer, that was designed by people who believe in and use calculus and the FACT that pi = 3.14159.... very day to solve practical problems and get the correct answers that actually work. Especially when he cannot give any examples where his conceptions give the correct answers but real calculus does not.

Combined with his lies and misrepresentations about the work and posts of others, his ridiculous flailings are not even entertaining any more, as they are simply repetitive and non-responsive, mere repetitions of previously-made and undefensible assertions.

[gravityblock]

The question you refuse to answer (now asked THIRTEEN TIMES) is: "When you say that Mathis http://milesmathis.com/vel5.jpg diagram contains euclidean and non-euclidean geometries.  Please point out which elements are in which geometries."

You are not asking the right question.  If you don't ask the right question, then you won't get the right answer.  For example, the question, "which came first, the chicken or the egg?"  This is a bad question, for the question itself wrongly implies one came before the other, when they actually came together as one.  The chicken is in the egg, and the egg is in the form of a chicken.

Gravock