COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

[popolibero]

Hi Stefan and all,


I made a mistake in the single cap schematic I posted yesterday. Here's how I'm switching and reversing the one cap setup. One AC switch is made of two mosfets (even tough I drew a tranny symbol). One switch is enough, but I had to use two in parallel because I could not sum the 4 control signals without getting a short in the control part.

regards,
Mario

[x_name41]

looks, if in the resonance circuit have 100VAr, it of the output these 100VAr are transformed into 100Watts really output power, while at the entrance from DC power supply are consumed 5Watts

[listener191]

Here are two caps switching although I cannot get the timing exactly how I want it.
I am not familiar with this simulation software but it seems to show the AC source has all the power returned to it but still 76W in the load.

Barry

$ 1 4.9999999999999996E-6 13.654669808981877 40 5.0 50
v 480 416 480 288 0 1 50.0 177.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
T 544 320 640 384 0 0.1 1.0 3.494852635728435 3.3921596953589983E-7 0.9999
w 480 288 544 288 0
w 544 288 544 320 0
w 544 384 544 416 0
w 640 320 640 288 0
r 672 288 768 288 0 24.0
w 640 384 640 416 0
r 480 416 544 416 0 0.01
p 640 384 640 320 0
l 640 416 800 416 0 0.1 3.392159679677098E-7
c 960 320 960 384 0 3.9999999999999996E-5 58.07598538954926
159 832 288 768 288 0 0.1 1.0E10
w 912 288 960 288 0
w 960 288 960 320 0
w 912 416 960 416 0
w 960 416 960 384 0
w 880 240 1008 240 0
w 672 288 672 240 0
w 768 288 768 240 0
s 672 240 768 240 0 1 false
w 736 560 768 560 0
g 480 416 480 432 0
c 896 384 896 320 0 3.9999999999999996E-5 0.0010000000002964764
w 912 416 848 416 0
w 768 288 768 320 0
w 768 560 800 560 0
w 800 560 816 560 0
w 672 288 640 288 0
w 880 240 832 240 0
w 832 288 912 288 0
w 800 416 848 416 0
w 896 384 896 416 0
159 864 320 800 320 0 0.1 1.0E10
w 800 320 768 320 0
w 864 320 896 320 0
w 832 240 800 240 0
w 800 240 800 272 0
w 816 560 1040 560 0
w 1040 560 1040 208 0
w 1040 208 832 208 0
w 832 208 832 304 0
152 640 560 736 560 0 2 0.0
152 640 480 736 480 0 2 0.0
w 736 480 1008 480 0
w 1008 480 1008 240 0
R 640 576 592 576 1 2 100.0 2.5 2.5 0.08726646259971647 0.4
R 640 496 592 496 1 2 100.0 2.5 2.5 1.6580627893946132 0.4
w 800 592 832 592 0
o 0 32 0 35 279.96809277222553 22.397447421778043 0 -1
o 0 32 1 291 2394.524282602951 9.765625E-55 1 -1
o 11 32 0 34 130.93562431584567 1.309356243158457 2 -1
o 11 32 0 33 32.73390607896142 2.618712486316914 2 -1
o 6 32 1 35 149.65776766268445 9.765625E-55 3 -1

[Farmhand]

When these guys say that the output is over 50 Watts and the input is only 1.1 Watts, aren't they actually saying that
the setup outputs over 50 Joules of energy per second with only 1.1 Joules of energy per second input ?

..

[listener191]

Sorry, that last simulation is only using one cap. The left one has a connectivity problem.

The generator still has to generate 1.29 KVA peak to support this load. The supply company would not be a happy about this. Seems like SERPS just defeats meters that dont measure reactive power.

Barry