COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

[Farmhand]

Well, if as Mario said on the other forum the power is just borrowed and returned, we don't need a fancy switching scheme to do
that. I think the claim is that the out of phase current does work.

Well below is a scope shot 1) showing a light globe load which is experiencing an over 70 degree phase shift between voltage
and current, so it appears that a 12 volt 3 watt rated globe has 14 volts RMS across it and is apparently experiencing
about 0,7 amp of current in a part designed for .25 amp. going by the math trace there is about 11 VA applied to the globe
and about 7 VA returned to the previous circuit element, the scope shot for the previous element
(a resonant tank "coil and capacitor") is below also, the shots are labeled "globe load" and "Tank loaded" .

The 7 VA returned from the globe load is shown in the "tank" shot as the purple power trace going under the 0 line by
about 7 VA , the second shot the Math vertical division is 20 Watts per division and the Load shot the Math trace is 10 Watts per
division. The current is sensed through 0.1 Ohm resistors. I'll add a video or drawing to show the scope probe placement.

Point is that the out of phase current does not contribute to the transfer of energy to the load. I can also unload the DC power
supply by connecting a load if tuned correctly, that's in the video. The shots are taken while the circuit is in a running condition
where the load does not affect the input power.

Note the current magnitude and phase shift is different in the load as compared to the tank supplying it. But that's another story,
shot shows the globe taking about 11 VA and returning about 7 VA to the previous circuit element. 4 Watts consumed.
I think.

Here's the videos showing the input power loaded and unloaded and the scope probe placements. Part two show the load
voltage current and power traces ect.

Video part one shows scope placement and input power.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mLALutgqCc

Video part two shows the load current scoped at just after 4:40 in the video. The load voltage is the same probe point as the
tank voltage, just the current sense probe needs be swapped to show load current.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDs128Q64lc

I'll photograph my circuit sketch and post it shortly, it shows better the scope placement and the entire circuit
as is open source method.

.
EDIT: Circuit drawing shows entire HF AC generator circuit but the only portion of interest here is the top right hand corner, the
output coil and the load and showing the scope probe placement.

EDITED to change "Watts" to VA in some parts of the post. People can decide for themselves what is "VA", what is "VAR" and
what is "Watts", so many different interpretations of it.
..

By analyzing the effect of loads to each previous circuit element back to the supply I can see "what gives", as far as the reactive
power goes, If I change from the power supply to a battery then I might see a reduction "net input" and get oscillations back into
the battery.  The power supply has a diode to prevent the oscillations but the input can be reduced by applying a load.

...

[TinselKoala]

Wow... a lot of nice thoughtful work happening. I am very pleased to see good scopeshots and what seems to be good data on them. Thumbs up, favorited, subscribed, whatever.

Meanwhile, it looks like you are just about to invent radio! Add some AM audio frequency modulation to that tank power and see what happens.

[listener191]

Hi Mario,

Attached is a scope shot of parallel charge, series discharge waveforms.

The key to obtaining this waveform was cap value versus load, and Falstad indicated that for a 200 ohn load, 6uf was about right.

My caps were originally 60uf.

I have a simulation with two inductors that basically does the same thing but suffers a similar problem of insufficient voltage maintained over the discharge perod, to obtain a discharge current the same magnitude as the charge current. The inductor provides an initial high current spike but the area under the pulse is still less than the charge pulse.

I think x 3 caps in series would be required to achieve this, so... whats the minimum switch scheme to charge 3 in parallel and discharge 3 in series?

Barry

[gotoluc]

Nice setup and demonstration Farmhand!

Thanks for taking the time to share your experiments.

Luc

[Farmhand]

Thanks Luc, Mario and Listener are doing great work also, they have almost perfectly replicated the SERPS wave forms, even I
hope that they will be successful, if it makes free energy then so be it. Doesn't hurt to be a bit skeptical, I still hope for some free
energy like most everyone.

Nice work Mario and Listener !

Go well all.