Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

Started by synchro1, May 07, 2014, 01:25:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

web000x

Quote from: Meta on May 07, 2016, 10:19:52 PM
How much greater switching time, than 5 ns, was showing on the scope? ......I Skyped an engineer on the QEG build project who agreed with me that Bearden's switching times were between 5-30 ns. This is adequate to rip off a chunk of spatial, electron potential during the electron relaxation time, not electrons but potentials.

Meta

Clearly, between the switching there is some distance much greater than nanoseconds considering that scope resolution is at 5ms/div. 

As shown by this scope shot:  http://energyscienceconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/20140628_180102.jpg

Meta

Quote from: web000x on May 08, 2016, 01:10:57 AM
Clearly, between the switching there is some distance much greater than nanoseconds considering that scope resolution is at 5ms/div. 

As shown by this scope shot:  http://energyscienceconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/20140628_180102.jpg

I would make an educated guess that Murry and Babcock are using two of everything since I heard they are using two outputs, doubling the fast switches from 3 to 6 and the signal is a dual spike before it repeats again, flipping one half of the hardware inversely and backward to use it against the other half, which is the proper 2D shift of dimensions necessary in all over unity machines.

Also, since the scope is seeing a 5 ms/div time, they may be using lower, harmonic partials of the super fast 5 ns.

Thats all, folks.  8)

Khwartz

Hello Dave, it's been a long time and you know how sceptical I got on all the whole affaire but guess what, here something which gave me hope again about.

It is not Jim or Paul saying but Eric Dollard.

Hear the first minutes starting especially to minute 00:43; it is about charging in parallel and discharging in series (if my English were good enough to well understand - You may confirm my hearing ;) ) at very hight speed by vibrations.

https://youtu.be/vwu8rspxQWE

Best Regards,
Didier

web000x

Quote from: Khwartz on June 05, 2016, 08:46:40 PM
Hello Dave, it's been a long time and you know how sceptical I got on all the whole affaire but guess what, here something which gave me hope again about.

It is not Jim or Paul saying but Eric Dollard.

Hear the first minutes starting especially to minute 00:43; it is about charging in parallel and discharging in series (if my English were good enough to well understand - You may confirm my hearing ;) ) at very hight speed by vibrations.

https://youtu.be/vwu8rspxQWE

Best Regards,
Didier


Yeah, when I worked with Eric Dollard, he always spoke about the series-parallel capacitor phenomena.  It's when I saw Jim's 2014 presentation that I really took it seriously.  Eric always spoke highly of Jim's work and almost started collaborating with Jim again but complications kept that at bay.  I feel like this is the one, but tuning is difficult.  It seems there are many factors in making this thing run right.  I'm feeling hopeful about the content regarding the transforming generator that Jim Murray will speak about in this upcoming conference.  I just hope the video comes out shortly after...


Dave

Meta

Eric Dollards comment "series-parallel capacitor charge/discharge" is Eric playing technician rather than scientist.

Technician or technique has a root called "I find a trick".

Eric, the technician, has found another trick or technique, to get the circuits to do what he wants.