COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

[Khwartz]

There may be much more than what is presently believed
to this device.  Apparently much more than simply charging
and discharging capacitors or inductors at critical points
repetitively within each cycle of Input (well timed periods
of Taking then Giving Back) Voltage and Current.

What would it take to perfect the illusion of being able to
return to the Source nearly all of the power extracted by
the load;  in such a way that power measurement devices
are incapable of recognizing the illusion?

Hi SeaMonkey! That is exactly my intuition when I saw the video where they demonstrate to a Japanese wind-turbine investor.

Is it a scheme of high speed extraction and return of energy
for very brief periods multiple times during the duration of
each Input Cycle?

Obviously, whatever is taking place to produce the "Magic"
is quite complex and at a considerably higher frequency than
the power line.  Why else would the device need electronic
switches which are capable of nanoSecond speeds?

It is a very clever scheme, to be sure.  Playing Ponzi on the
Source with what appears to be reliability.

I am more and more afraid that You're right :/

[Meta]

What would it take to perfect the illusion of being able to
return to the Source nearly all of the power extracted by
the load;  in such a way that power measurement devices
are incapable of recognizing the illusion?

It would take nano second switching
OR
a 45 degree rotor that is offsetting all internal parameters
OR
both.

Meta

[web000x]

Hopefully I will be able to glean some insight when this year's  conference videos  start coming out.  Murray is  doing a presentation on the transforming generator which I have a feeling will be very helpful.  I have a modular test bed setup with which I can easily modify all circuit parameters, timing and duty cycles.  I'm poking around with a few experiments now but really could use some down to earth engineering direction for determining correct component values.  It is all still too much an enigma to me at this point.

Dave

[web000x]

Quote from: SeaMonkey on August 18, 2014, 08:20:32 AM
>

Is it a scheme of high speed extraction and return of energy
for very brief periods multiple times during the duration of
each Input Cycle?

Obviously, whatever is taking place to produce the "Magic"
is quite complex and at a considerably higher frequency than
the power line.  Why else would the device need electronic
switches which are capable of nanoSecond speeds?

It is a very clever scheme, to be sure.  Playing Ponzi on the
Source with what appears to be reliability.

From what I can tell, the nanosecond switching Paul developed was for his flyback energy capture in his motor design.  When he cuts the power flow to an inductor, he said he needed to make switching transitions in less than 5 ns in order to redirect the magnetic energy into his storage elements.  Otherwise, I think he was blowing up transistors or wasting too much stored energy into system losses.  What is curious to me is that in the scope shot from the conference, you can clearly see a dwell time between the switching transistions in the SERPS process that is much greater than 5 ns.  I wonder if Paul's fast switching was actually used here or if the switches were uses strictly for their mechanical-like nature.

Dave

[Meta]

Quote from: SeaMonkey on August 18, 2014, 08:20:32 AM

From what I can tell, the nanosecond switching Paul developed was for his flyback energy capture in his motor design.  When he cuts the power flow to an inductor, he said he needed to make switching transitions in less than 5 ns in order to redirect the magnetic energy into his storage elements.  Otherwise, I think he was blowing up transistors or wasting too much stored energy into system losses.  What is curious to me is that in the scope shot from the conference, you can clearly see a dwell time between the switching transistions in the SERPS process that is much greater than 5 ns.  I wonder if Paul's fast switching was actually used here or if the switches were uses strictly for their mechanical-like nature.

Dave

How much greater switching time, than 5 ns, was showing on the scope? ......I Skyped an engineer on the QEG build project who agreed with me that Bearden's switching times were between 5-30 ns. This is adequate to rip off a chunk of spatial, electron potential during the electron relaxation time, not electrons but potentials.

Meta