Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Fundamentals of FREE ENERGY generation with a transformer. Experiment #1

Started by tarakan, June 12, 2014, 06:22:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

tarakan

But there has to be some rationality behind all those "Recipes of obtaining Overunity" that flood the internet.

There are four categories:

1) Permanent magnet motors - the V gate arrangement(I tried a linear motor - it works. Now I want to make it spin in a circle), the Perendev Motor, the Searl Generator, etc
2) Electromagnetic overunity - Bedini motors, other devices that use moving parts and coils.
3) Transformer- based devices - Kapanadze generator, Akula device, Hubbard Generator, etc.
4) Atmospheric Ion generators and Cosmic ray generators. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Townsend_avalanche , Nikola Tesla PATENT 685,958, etc.

1) So far I failed to make a rotating V-Gate motor, however I developed a beautiful 3D printable set to test the V gate motor that I am currently playing with.
2) This category seems to be the most ridden with false assumptions and pseudoscience, since it involves charging and discharging batteries. Inventors may not be aware of the battery surface charge phenomenon.
3) This is what makes Joule Ringer work better with a ground attached to it than without a ground. The common denominator of this is the so-called Ferroresonance.
4) Most scientifically proven, least efficient. The idea is to use "ions" from the atmosphere to generate power or to catch specially formed energy formations known as the Radiant Energy that can charge capacitors remotely and sometimes experimenters achieved it unintentionally.

So I want to work with 1 and 3 at this point.

I want to resonate a Tesla Coil so it explodes from electricity.
I need Pulse Position Modulation (PPM) to time a pulse to excite the coil, I realized.

tarakan

Quote from: vasik041 on June 13, 2014, 04:40:02 AM
 
Why you think that there is a common denominator?

P.S. Some more practical circuits here http://vasik041.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/fe_basics.pdf

This is a great amount of work! A well-written textbook.
vasik041, you are a genius.
I think deductively. So I am trying to find a common denominator.

Maybe there are few subcategories for the transformer.

There is a movement in FE that uses a so-called grey tube, a DIY cousin to thyratrons and spark gaps.

I think that you should read the first chapter of Secrets of Cold War Technology, where the author is describing Nikola Tesla experiments.
Than there are those two videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7gPeIVVy0A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aJP_yp_tn4

This is what Tesla used to drive his transformers.


But there is a common denominator out here. Otherwise why would there be so many transformer - based devices.
Official physics is too conformist to accept the theory behind those devices. This keeps us, the hobbyists in the jungle.

vasik041

QuoteI think that you should read the first chapter of Secrets of Cold War Technology

I've already read it some time ago... Entertaining, but not very usefull :-)

If you want know about Tesla's work read what he wrote himself.

If you study history of radio, you will find that main reason why spark gaps excitation circuits were replaced was...their low efficiency.


P.S. another text http://vasik041.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/fe_principles.pdf


tarakan

Quote from: vasik041 on June 13, 2014, 07:25:38 AM
I've already read it some time ago... Entertaining, but not very usefull :-)

If you want know about Tesla's work read what he wrote himself.

If you study history of radio, you will find that main reason why spark gaps excitation circuits were replaced was...their low efficiency.

P.S. another text http://vasik041.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/fe_principles.pdf

I know. But they could produce a very sharp pulse. I don't want to deal with spark gaps.
I want to design a Frequency Divider --> Microcontroller --> PPM circuit. I want to see those capacitor - transformers resonate themselves to shreds.

You should try categorizing devices by their possible principle of operation. Categorize them to how far they stand from known laws of physics.

vasik041

QuoteCategorize them to how far they stand from known laws of physics.

I think all devices works according to known laws of physics :-)