Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator

[ALVARO_CS]

@Hanon: thanks, I missed it.

@pedro: this toroidal coil in your pic, is it with an iron core or wood core ?
            In your tests do you get AC or variable DC ?

I,m working myself in a small scale prototype made with junk parts out of two car starter motor electromagnets, and two magnets from a microwave oven.

I can see you already got neo magnets, in case you need a provider,
there is a german company with cheap prices (sent by post for just 9 €)   http://www.supermagnete.es/index.php
saludos
Alvaro

[pedroxime]

Hi Alvaro, are you Spanish?
Yes i bought the magnets at this site but are many also in Spain and more fast to deliver.
I tried both air core and iron core, with the air core you must to make an wood coil about 2 cm wide or more if not  coil will not produce, if you don't use diodes of course its AC. Iron core is best the problem is that you must to build a strong center coil frame supporter otherwise you'll have a lot of problem with magnets.
Definitively the coil must to be radial, if you do a little research you'll find that the magnetic field out of a toroidal radial coil is zero. This is not the case of Rodin coil and others. This is not new guys toroidal coil generators have been around since 1850's and they are the best for free energy cause it doesn't matter if you take 5w, 50w or 500w its always the same torque in the rotor.
I'm now in other projects and don't have a lot of time but if someone is interested go for it, it will take you a couple of hundred hours  but i will work as claimed in the patent, I don't know other free energy generator as simple, cheap and easy to build as this.

[ALVARO_CS]

Hi pedro
yes spanish living in Malaga (born Valencia)

may you post the link to your mags provider in Spain ? (or mail me or also we can speak via phone)
saludos
Alvaro

[forest]

Hi all,

The most intriguing fact is that the Hogan - Jakovlewich overunity generator is based on the same concept as one of the patents from Clemente Figuera. One of the designs by Figuera (Spanish Patent No. 30376, the generatorn with a rotary coil) is also based on the concept of placing the induced coil between two inducer electromagnets.

In Figuera´s generator the stationary part are the electromagnets and the moving part is the induced coil

Again we find that Figuera also proposed a induced circuit placed BETWEEN TWO OPPOSITE MAGNETS.

Would we find some special behaviour in this kind of arrangement?

I attach the link to the Figuera´s patent No. 30376:

http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/figuera_30376.pdf

.

Almost there hanon ! Something seems broken in picture though ; how is the interior excitary electromagnet powered ? It should be on not movable frame tied back with external excitary electromagnets, probably connected in series of many wires but enough to get strong magnetic field yet with moderate amperage.That is first essencial part, second is to rotate fast the drum-coil. Almost no Lenz drag. I see it in my mindperfectly , it's very efficient.

[hanon]

 
Hogan and Jakovlewich generator seems to be like two homopolar generators one in front of each other, with opposite poles in each side of the intermediate grid.

I wonder if this configuration with two homopolar generators will get any special effect which may avoid any dragging on the inducer discs.

I haven´t yet had time to test it